Vaccines are one of the most effective means of preventing influenza A, typically containing the hemagglutinin (HA) of the influenza A virus. However, antigenic drift and shift of the influenza A virus can lead to instability in vaccine efficacy. Compared to HA, the antigenic variation rate of neuraminidase (NA) is slower. In traditional inactivated influenza vaccines, although they contain a certain amount of NA, there are significant differences between different batches, which cannot consistently induce NA-based immune responses. Therefore, NA is often overlooked in vaccine development. In this study, we report an mRNA vaccine encoding the NA of two strains of influenza A virus. The experimental results demonstrated that when matched with the viral strain, this mRNA vaccine induced high levels of neutralizing antibodies, providing a protective effect to mice in viral challenge experiments, and this immune response was shown to be biased towards the Th1 type. In summary, this study demonstrates that NA is a promising potential antigen, providing new insights for the development of influenza A virus vaccines.

Background: The Influenza A virus (IAV), a pathogen affecting the respiratory system, represents a major risk to public health worldwide. Immunization remains the foremost strategy to control the transmission of IAV. The virus has two primary antigens: hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Our previous studies have demonstrated that an IAV NA mRNA vaccine can induce Th1-type immune responses in mice. This research examined the immune responses elicited by an mRNA vaccine targeting both HA and NA antigens in murine models. Methods: In this study, we used two dual-antigen immunization strategies: single-site immunization with an IAV HA+NA mRNA vaccine and multi-site immunization with an IAV HA mRNA vaccine and IAV NA mRNA vaccine. Hemagglutination-inhibiting antibody titer and neutralizing antibody titer in the sera of immunized mice were evaluated, and a viral challenge experiment was conducted. Additionally, the immune responses elicited by the two immunization strategies were characterized using flow cytometry and ELISA. Comparative analyses were performed with mice immunized individually with the IAV HA mRNA vaccine, IAV NA mRNA vaccine, and inactivated vaccine. Results: The results showed that by using a multi-site immunization strategy, mice were able to generate higher levels of hemagglutination-inhibiting and neutralizing antibodies, and were protected in a viral challenge experiment. Moreover, the multi-site regimen also promoted the generation of cytotoxic T cells and maintained a balanced Th1/Th2 immune response. Conclusions: Using mRNA vaccine based on a HA and NA antigen with multi-site immunization strategy can induce higher levels of hemagglutination-inhibiting and neutralizing antibodies, and multi-type immune responses in mice, providing new theoretical and experimental support for advancing upcoming influenza vaccines.