Stephen Jones

Dr. Stephen Jones

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 October 2023 in Coatings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJStephen Jones
Stephen Jones
NRNadine Rehfeld
Nadine Rehfeld
CSClaus Schreiner
Claus Schreiner
KDKirsten Dyer
Kirsten Dyer
The relationship between the bulk thermomechanical properties and rain erosion resistance of development polyaspartate-based coatings as candidate leading edge protection (LEP) materials for wind turbine blades is investigated by the combined application of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and rain erosion testing (RET) within a novel test method (DMA+RET). This method introduces the use of DMA+RET to both monitor the change in thermomechanical properties with respect to raindrop impact and subsequently rationalise differences in rain erosion resistance between coating formulations of comparable composition. The application of this combined process has demonstrated the importance of relatively high viscoelastic moduli at increased strain rates and creep recovery after RET as key material properties to be considered for LEP material development, whereas previous research presented in the scientific literature has primarily focussed on the use of routine characterisation procedures by tensile testing or stand-alone DMA to evaluate coating formulations prior to rain erosion testing. This journal article therefore presents a novel method to evaluate key material properties relevant to rain erosion resistance before and after subjection to raindrop impact using standard ASTM G73 RET equipment. The test method is demonstrated on a novel polyaspartate-based coating, PA-U, that exhibits notable rain erosion resistance in comparison to commercial LEP products. PA-U exhibited negligible mass loss after 30 h of rain erosion testing and favourable thermomechanical properties (E″ = 35 MPa at critical strain; equilibrium recoverable compliance of 0.05 MPa−1) in comparison to alternative formulations.

28 January 2025 in Wind
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPeter Kinsley
Peter Kinsley
SPSam Porteous
Sam Porteous
SJStephen Jones
Stephen Jones
PSPriyan Subramanian
Priyan Subramanian
OFOlga Campo Ferrero
Olga Campo Ferrero
KDKirsten Dyer
Kirsten Dyer
Blade leading edge erosion (LEE) is a persistent challenge in the wind industry, resulting in reduced aerodynamic efficiency and increased maintenance costs, with an estimated total expense of GBP 1.3M over a 25-year turbine lifetime. To mitigate these effects, leading edge protection (LEP) systems are widely used, but their real-world performance often falls short of predictions based on the standard rain erosion test (RET). This study investigates the limitations of current RET practices, which are designed to accelerate testing but fail to replicate the diverse environmental conditions experienced by wind turbines. Two LEPs with contrasting viscoelastic properties were tested using a novel design of experiments (DoEs) approach. The study explored the droplet impact frequency, combination and sequencing of high or low rainfall intensities, recovery during the inspection period and droplet size effects on erosion behaviour, to uncover significant differences in material performance compared to standard RET conditions. Results, supported by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), indicated that the chosen LEPs undergo a transition between elastic and brittle failure modes at a critical impact frequency, influenced by the viscoelastic properties of the material. Importantly, the findings emphasise the need for revised testing protocols across a range of parameters that incorporate realistic environmental conditions to improve the predictability of LEP performance.