Naomi Paxton

Dr. Naomi Paxton


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 November 2017 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NPNaomi Paxton
Naomi Paxton
WSWilli Smolan
Willi Smolan
TBThomas Böck
Thomas Böck
Ferry MelchelsFerry Melchels
Ferry Melchels
JGJürgen Groll
Jürgen Groll
JTJungst Tomasz
Jungst Tomasz
The development and formulation of printable inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting has been a major challenge in the field of biofabrication. Inks, often polymer solutions with the addition of crosslinking to form hydrogels, must not only display adequate mechanical properties for the chosen application but also show high biocompatibility as well as printability. Here we describe a reproducible two-step method for the assessment of the printability of inks for bioprinting, focussing firstly on screening ink formulations to assess fibre formation and the ability to form 3D constructs before presenting a method for the rheological evaluation of inks to characterise the yield point, shear thinning and recovery behaviour. In conjunction, a mathematical model was formulated to provide a theoretical understanding of the pressure-driven, shear thinning extrusion of inks through needles in a bioprinter. The assessment methods were trialled with a commercially available crème, poloxamer 407, alginate-based inks and an alginate-gelatine composite material. Yield stress was investigated by applying a stress ramp to a number of inks, which demonstrated the necessity of high yield for printable materials. The shear thinning behaviour of the inks was then characterised by quantifying the degree of shear thinning and using the mathematical model to predict the window of printer operating parameters in which the materials could be printed. Furthermore, the model predicted high shear conditions and high residence times for cells at the walls of the needle and effects on cytocompatibility at different printing conditions. Finally, the ability of the materials to recover to their original viscosity after extrusion was examined using rotational recovery rheological measurements. Taken together, these assessment techniques revealed significant insights into the requirements for printable inks and shear conditions present during the extrusion process and allow the rapid and reproducible characterisation of a wide variety of inks for bioprinting.

1 September 2019 in European Polymer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNaomi Paxton
Naomi Paxton
MAMark Allenby
Mark Allenby
PLPhilip M. Lewis
Philip M. Lewis
MWMaria Woodruff
Maria Woodruff

14 November 2017 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSimone Stichler
Simone Stichler
TBThomas Böck
Thomas Böck
NPNaomi Paxton
Naomi Paxton
SBSarah Bertlein
Sarah Bertlein
RLRiccardo Levato
Riccardo Levato
JGJürgen Groll
Jürgen Groll
This study investigates the use of allyl-functionalized poly(glycidol)s (P(AGE- co -G)) as a cytocompatible cross-linker for thiol-functionalized hyaluronic acid (HA-SH) and the optimization of this hybrid hydrogel as bioink for 3D bioprinting. The chemical cross-linking of gels with 10 wt.% overall polymer concentration was achieved by a UV-induced radical thiol-ene coupling between the thiol and allyl groups. The addition of unmodified high molecular weight HA (1.36 MDa) enabled the rheology to be tuned for extrusion-based bioprinting. The incorporation of additional HA resulted in hydrogels with a lower Young’s modulus and a higher swelling ratio, especially in the first 24 h, but a comparable equilibrium swelling for all gels after 24 h. Embedding of human and equine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the gels and subsequent in vitro culture showed promising chondrogenic differentiation after 21 d for cells from both origins. Moreover, cells could be printed with these gels, and embedded hMSCs showed good cell survival for at least 21 d in culture. To achieve mechanically stable and robust constructs for the envisioned application in articular cartilage, the formulations were adjusted for double printing with thermoplastic poly( ε -caprolactone) (PCL).

1 August 2020 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NPNaomi Paxton
Naomi Paxton
RDRyan Daley
Ryan Daley
DFDavid P. Forrestal
David P. Forrestal
MAMark Allenby
Mark Allenby
MWMaria A. Woodruff
Maria A. Woodruff

1 May 2020 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNaomi Paxton
Naomi Paxton
MLMatthew Lanaro
Matthew Lanaro
ABArixin Bo
Arixin Bo
NCNathan Crooks
Nathan Crooks
MRMaureen T. Ross
Maureen T. Ross
MWMaria Woodruff
Maria Woodruff

9 June 2022 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jeremy DinoroJeremy Dinoro
Jeremy Dinoro
NPNaomi Paxton
Naomi Paxton
JSJacob Skewes
Jacob Skewes
ZYZhilian Yue
Zhilian Yue
PLPhilip M. Lewis
Philip M. Lewis
GWGordon G. Wallace
Gordon G. Wallace
The adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques into the medical space has revolutionised tissue engineering. Depending upon the tissue type, specific AM approaches are capable of closely matching the physical and biological tissue attributes, to guide tissue regeneration. For hard tissue such as bone, powder bed fusion (PBF) techniques have significant potential, as they are capable of fabricating materials that can match the mechanical requirements necessary to maintain bone functionality and support regeneration. This review focuses on the PBF techniques that utilize laser sintering for creating scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications. Optimal scaffold requirements are explained, ranging from material biocompatibility and bioactivity, to generating specific architectures to recapitulate the porosity, interconnectivity, and mechanical properties of native human bone. The main objective of the review is to outline the most common materials processed using PBF in the context of BTE; initially outlining the most common polymers, including polyamide, polycaprolactone, polyethylene, and polyetheretherketone. Subsequent sections investigate the use of metals and ceramics in similar systems for BTE applications. The last section explores how composite materials can be used. Within each material section, the benefits and shortcomings are outlined, including their mechanical and biological performance, as well as associated printing parameters. The framework provided can be applied to the development of new, novel materials or laser-based approaches to ultimately generate bone tissue analogues or for guiding bone regeneration.