Nadine E Andrew

Dr. Nadine E Andrew


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2014 in International Journal of Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANadine E Andrew
Nadine E Andrew
MKMonique Kilkenny
Monique Kilkenny
RNRebecca Naylor
Rebecca Naylor
TPTara Purvis
Tara Purvis
ELErin Lalor
Erin Lalor
Dominique CadilhacDominique Cadilhac
Dominique Cadilhac

1 November 2021 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLachlan L. Dalli
Lachlan L. Dalli
JKJoosup Kim
Joosup Kim
Dominique CadilhacDominique Cadilhac
Dominique Cadilhac
MGMelanie Greenland
Melanie Greenland
FSFrank Sanfilippo
Frank Sanfilippo
MKMonique Kilkenny
Monique Kilkenny
Background and Purpose: Although a target of 80% medication adherence is commonly cited, it is unclear whether greater adherence improves survival after stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We investigated associations between medication adherence during the first year postdischarge, and mortality up to 3 years, to provide evidence-based targets for medication adherence. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 1-year survivors of first-ever stroke or TIA, aged ≥18 years, from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (July 2010–June 2014) linked with nationwide prescription refill and mortality data (until August 2017). Adherence to antihypertensive agents, statins, and nonaspirin antithrombotic medications was based on the proportion of days covered from discharge until 1 year. Cox regression with restricted cubic splines was used to investigate nonlinear relationships between medication adherence and all-cause mortality (to 3 years postdischarge). Models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic position, stroke factors, primary care factors, and concomitant medication use. Results: Among 8363 one-year survivors of first-ever stroke or TIA (44% aged ≥75 years, 44% female, 18% TIA), 75% were supplied antihypertensive agents. In patients without intracerebral hemorrhage (N=7446), 84% were supplied statins, and 65% were supplied nonaspirin antithrombotic medications. Median adherence was ≈90% for each medication group. Between 1% and 100% adherence, greater adherence to statins or antihypertensive agents, but not nonaspirin antithrombotic agents, was associated with improved survival. When restricted to linear regions above 60% adherence, each 10% increase in adherence was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality of 13% for antihypertensive agents (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81–0.95]), 13% for statins (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80–0.95]), and 15% for nonaspirin antithrombotic agents (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.79–0.93]). Conclusions: Greater levels of medication adherence after stroke or TIA are associated with improved survival, even among patients with near-perfect adherence. Interventions to improve medication adherence are needed to maximize survival poststroke.

1 October 2016 in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NANadine E Andrew
Nadine E Andrew
VSVijaya Sundararajan
Vijaya Sundararajan
ATAmanda G. Thrift
Amanda G. Thrift
MKMonique F. Kilkenny
Monique F. Kilkenny
JKJudith Katzenellenbogen
Judith Katzenellenbogen
Dominique CadilhacDominique Cadilhac
Dominique Cadilhac

1 July 2015 in Patient Preference and Adherence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NANadine E Andrew
Nadine E Andrew
MKMonique Kilkenny
Monique Kilkenny
RNRebecca Naylor
Rebecca Naylor
TPTara Purvis
Tara Purvis
Dominique CadilhacDominique Cadilhac
Dominique Cadilhac
Background: Caregivers play a crucial role in meeting the needs of survivors of stroke. Yet, little is known about how they are impacted by their caregiving role. Objectives: To describe the relationship between survivor long-term unmet needs (>12 months) and caregiver impacts, and identify characteristics that are associated with reported moderate to severe impacts on caregivers. Method: This was a cross-sectional survey using data from the Australian Stroke Survivor and Carer Needs Survey. Community dwelling adults 12+ months poststroke and their caregivers participated. Caregivers and survivors were asked about the extent to which the domains of work, leisure and family, and friend and spousal relationships had been impacted using a Likert scale of responses. The extent to which survivor needs were being met was measured over the domains of health, everyday living, work, leisure, and finances, and the total number of unmet needs was calculated. The association between survivor unmet needs and caregiver impacts was assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for caregiver and survivor characteristics. Results: Of the 738 completed survivor surveys, 369 contained matched caregiver data (survivors: median age, 71 years; 67% male) (caregivers: median age, 64 years; 26% male). For caregivers, the domains of work, leisure, and friendships were most impacted. The odds of a caregiver experiencing moderate to extreme impacts increased with the number of reported survivor unmet needs. This was greatest for spousal (aOR [adjusted odds ratio]: 1.14; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.07, 1.21; P<0.001) and friend relationships (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.21; P<0.001). Caring for a survivor who needed daily living assistance was associated with moderate to extreme caregiver impacts across all domains. Conclusion: Caregivers of survivors of stroke experience large negative impacts, the extent to which is associated with survivors unmet needs. Targeted, long-term solutions are needed to support survivors and caregivers living in the community.

5 January 2021 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLachlan L. Dalli
Lachlan L. Dalli
JKJoosup Kim
Joosup Kim
ATAmanda G. Thrift
Amanda G. Thrift
NANadine E Andrew
Nadine E Andrew
FSFrank Sanfilippo
Frank Sanfilippo
OCon behalf of the AuSCR Consortium
on behalf of the AuSCR Consortium
Objective To investigate whether certain patient, acute care, or primary care factors are associated with medication initiation and discontinuation in the community after stroke or TIA. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study using prospective data on adult patients with first-ever acute stroke/TIA from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (April 2010 to June 2014), linked with nationwide medication dispensing and Medicare claims data. Medication users were those with ≥1 dispensing in the year postdischarge. Discontinuation was assessed among medication users and defined as having no medication supply for ≥90 days in the year postdischarge. Multivariable competing risks regression, accounting for death during the observation period, was conducted to investigate factors associated with time to medication discontinuation. Results Among 17,980 registry patients with stroke/TIA, 91.4% were linked to administrative datasets. Of these, 9,817 adults with first-ever stroke/TIA were included (45.4% female, 47.6% aged ≥75 years, and 11.4% intracerebral hemorrhage). While most patients received secondary prevention medications (79.3% antihypertensive, 81.8% antithrombotic, and 82.7% lipid-lowering medication), between one-fifth and one-third discontinued treatment over the subsequent year postdischarge (20.9% antihypertensive, 34.1% antithrombotic, and 28.5% lipid-lowering medications). Prescription at hospital discharge (sub–hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.79), quarterly contact with a primary care physician (SHR 0.62; 95% CI 0.57–0.67), and prescription by a specialist physician (SHR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77–0.98) were all inversely associated with antihypertensive discontinuation. Conclusions Patterns of use of secondary prevention medications after stroke/TIA are not optimal, with many survivors discontinuing treatment within 1 year postdischarge. Improving postdischarge care for patients with stroke/TIA is needed to minimize unwarranted discontinuation.

3 September 2012 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NANadine E Andrew
Nadine E Andrew
RWRory Wolfe
Rory Wolfe
PCPeter Cameron
Peter Cameron
MRM. Richardson
M. Richardson
RPRichard S Page
Richard S Page
Belinda GabbeBelinda Gabbe
Belinda Gabbe