Background: The Swedish health care system is undergoing a transformation. eHealth technologies are increasingly being used. The System Usability Scale is a widely used tool, offering a standardized and reliable measure for assessing the usability of digital health solutions. However, despite the existence of several translations of the System Usability Scale into Swedish, none have undergone psychometric validation. This highlights the urgent need for a validated and standardized Swedish version of the System Usability Scale to ensure accurate and reliable usability evaluations. Objective: The aim of the study was to translate and psychometrically evaluate a Swedish version of the System Usability Scale. Methods: The study utilized a 2-phase design. The first phase translated the System Usability Scale into Swedish and the second phase tested the scale’s psychometric properties. A total of 62 participants generated a total of 82 measurements. Descriptive statistics were used to visualize participants’ characteristics. The psychometric evaluation consisted of data quality, scaling assumptions, and acceptability. Construct validity was evaluated by convergent validity, and reliability was evaluated by internal consistency. Results: The Swedish version of the System Usability Scale demonstrated high conformity with the original version. The scale showed high internal consistency with a Cronbach α of .852 and corrected item-total correlations ranging from 0.454 to 0.731. The construct validity was supported by a significant positive correlation between the System Usability Scale and domain 5 of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (P=.001). Conclusions: The Swedish version of the System Usability Scale demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be recommended for use in a Swedish context. The positive correlation with domain 5 of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire further supports the construct validity of the Swedish version of the System Usability Scale, affirming its suitability for evaluating digital health solutions. Additional tests of the Swedish version of the System Usability Scale, for example, in the evaluation of more complex eHealth technology, would further validate the scale.
Access to healthcare can facilitate parents’ self-management of their children’s care. Healthcare access can be described as consisting of six dimensions: approachability, acceptability, affordability, availability, appropriateness, and aperture. The aim of this study was to analyse these dimensions of healthcare access experienced by parents caring for their children at home following paediatric surgery. The method-directed content analysis, conducted with the six-dimensional framework of access to healthcare as a guide, was used to analyse twenty-two interviews with parents of children treated with paediatric surgery. All six dimensions were represented in the results. Acceptability was the most frequent dimension, followed by appropriateness and approachability. Affordability, availability, and aperture were less represented. Although access to healthcare after paediatric surgery is generally appropriate and approachable, parents may experience insecurity in performing the self-management needed. Complementary forms of information provision, e.g., telemedicine, can be valuable in this regard.
The need for improved organizational support for practice-based nurse scientists has been stressed. To provide a synopsis of the field, we mapped the existing literature. To map the existing literature on the development and evaluation, core components, and key success factors of practice-based models for nurse scientists. A scoping review was conducted. CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, EBSCO, and ERIC were searched for original articles in June 2024. In total, 14 papers were included. Five key success factors were identified. Thorough development processes were reported and, at large, the core components were uniform. Evaluations were diverse and nonrelated to patient care. Findings indicate key factors to consider when developing and implementing practice-based models for nurse scientists. Further, a possibility of progressing the research field from developing to evaluating the models. Consensus on outcomes may help to build an evidence basis on the significance of practice-based nurse scientists.
27 February 2019 in Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Registered nurses with a doctoral degree are important for the quality of care, nursing education, and nursing research. Still, postgraduate career paths are criticized for being too vague. To enable career path development, mapping of the current situation appears fundamental. The objective was therefore to chart the current professional positions and work conditions and to explore the future career aspirations of registered nurses with a doctoral degree in Sweden. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted including 118 participants, all nurses with a doctoral degree earned between 2016 and 2022. This study is reported in accordance with STROBE. The participants reported a significant change from hospital-based positions before doctoral studies, towards university-based positions after graduation. This is clearly in contrast to their expressed aspiration to hold a shared position, remaining in contact with the clinical context. In conclusion, a national collaboration is needed and wanted regarding career opportunities for registered nurses with a doctoral degree in Sweden. Furthermore, career paths within nursing science need to be established within the clinical context.