Poor ovarian reserve (POR) is an important limiting factor for the success of any treatment modality for infertility. It indicates a reduction in quantity and quality of oocytes in women of reproductive age group. It may be age related as seen in advanced years of reproductive life or may occur in young women due to diverse etiological factors. Evaluating ovarian reserve and individualizing the therapeutic strategies are very important for optimizing the success rate. Majority or women with POR need to undergo in vitro fertilization to achieve pregnancy. However, pregnancy rate remains low despite a plethora of interventions and is associated with high pregnancy loss. Early detection and active management are essential to minimize the need for egg donation in these women.

Ovarian reserve plays a crucial role in achieving pregnancy following any treatment in subfertile women. The estimation of ovarian reserve is routinely performed through various ovarian reserve tests (ORTs) in an effort to predict the response and outcome in couples prior to In Vitro Fertilization and counsel them. Most widely used tests are basal follicle stimulating hormone and anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count. The role of ORTs in our routine practice is discussed in this article. A MEDLINE search was done to identify suitable articles for review.

What is the effect of latent genital tuberculosis (GTB) on ovarian reserve in infertile women? Women with latent GTB have lower ovarian reserves and yield lower numbers of oocytes in IVF. Limited evidence suggests that women with GTB may have a low ovarian reserve. Infertile women have a high incidence of latent GTB and treatment improves fertility outcomes. This prospective study from February 2013 to January 2016 compared 431 infertile women diagnosed with latent GTB (Group I) to 453 infertile women without latent GTB (Group II). The study was conducted at Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India, a tertiary referral centre for infertility. Women of both groups were 21–38 years of age. Group I consisted of infertile women with proven tubal patency but with latent GTB diagnosed by DNA PCR testing of an endometrial biopsy. Day 2–4 anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were assessed in both groups. All women with latent GTB took antituberculosis therapy (ATT). Gonadotropin dosages and oocyte and embryo details were noted in both groups for those who underwent IVF. Women with latent GTB were younger (29.8 ± 4.4 years vs. 30.8 ± 4.5 years; P = 0.003) and, following adjustment for age, had significantly lower AMH [Median (IQR): 2 (0.9, 4.1) ng/ml vs 2.8 (1.3, 5) ng/ml; P = 0.01] and AFC [Median (IQR): 7 (5, 11) vs 8 (5, 14); P < 0.001]. Post ATT, women with latent GTB yielded fewer oocytes (9.3 ± 7.6 vs. 10.9 ± 8.1; P = 0.01), but had more grade I embryos transferred (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 0.89 ± 1.0; P = 0.001) and a better implantation rate (26.8% vs. 17.5%; P = 0.004) in IVF compared to women in Group II. Group I had a higher pregnancy rate compared to Group II (51.6% vs. 40.5%; P = 0.001), through various treatment modalities. Considering the adequacy of the sample size and use of robust ovarian reserve markers, the role of chance is minimal. The study is limited to an infertile population visiting a tertiary referral centre. The mechanisms by which latent GTB infection would lead to ovarian damage are unclear. It is believed that latent GTB is without any clinical significance. However, a low ovarian reserve in young women with latent GTB necessitates considering it as a cause of infertility, in women with prolonged infertility. These women may experience an accelerated decline in ovarian reserve with reduced success in achieving biological parenthood. Clinicians must be aware of this condition and its consequences while managing infertility. This study was funded by Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic, Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. N/A

Objective: To evaluate the role of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design: Prospective case-control study. Setting: Private tertiary fertility clinic. MATERIALS AND Methods: 31 infertile women with POR diagnosed as per the Bologna criteria. Interventions: DHEA supplementation for 2 months and a subsequent IVF cycle, after two previous IVF cycles with POR. Main Outcome Measure(S): Dose and duration of gonadotropin therapy, oocyte yield, embryo number and quality, pregnancy and live birth rate. Results: No difference was seen in gonadotropin requirement before and after DHEA supplementation. There was a significant increase in total and metaphase II oocytes (5.9 ± 0.68 vs. 2.73 ± 0.24; 4.45 ± 0.47 vs. 2.09 ± 0.26), fertilization (3.65 ± 0.49 vs. 2.00 ± 0.27), Grade I embryos (1.52 ± 0.25 vs. 0.55 ± 0.18), pregnancy rate (30% vs. 9.1%) and live birth rate (25% vs 0%) in those who completed the cycle, following DHEA supplementation. Conclusions: Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation results in an improvement in oocyte yield, embryo quality, and live birth rate in a group of women with POR having undergone at least two previous failures due to POR.