Li Senwei

Dr. Li Senwei


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 May 2023 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJingming Wu
Jingming Wu
YSyan zi shi
yan zi shi
LSLi Senwei
Li Senwei
Tiecheng BAITiecheng BAI
Tiecheng BAI
YHYufeng He
Yufeng He
XLXu Li
Xu Li
Red jujube is one of the most important crops in China. In order to meet the needs of the scientific and technological development of the jujube industry, solve the problem of poverty, realize the backward advantage, and promote economic development, smart agriculture is essential. The main objective of this study was to conduct an online detection study of unpicked red jujubes in order to detect as many red jujubes in the picture as possible while minimizing the occurrence of overfitting and underfitting. Experiments were conducted using the Histogram of Oriented Gradients + Support Vector Machine (HOG+SVM) traditional detection method and the You Only Look Once version 5 (YOLOV5) and Faster R-CNN modern deep learning detection methods. The precision, recall, and F1 score were compared to obtain a better algorithm. The study also introduced the AlexNet model with the main objective of attempting to combine it with other traditional algorithms to maximize accuracy. Labeling was used to label the training images in YOLOV5 and Faster Regions with CNN Features (Faster R-CNN) to train the machine model so that the computer recognized these features when it saw new unlabeled data in subsequent experiments. The experimental results show that in the online recognition detection of red jujubes, the YOLOV5 and Faster R-CNN algorithms performed better than the HOG + SVM algorithm, which presents precision, recall, and F1 score values of 93.55%, 82.79%, and 87.84% respectively; although the HOG + SVM algorithm was relatively quicker to perform. The precision of detection was obviously more important than the efficiency of detection in this study, so the YOLOV5 and Faster R-CNN algorithms were better than the HOG + SVM algorithm. In the experiments, the Faster R-CNN algorithm had 100% precision, 99.65% recall, an F1 score of 99.82%, and 83% non-underfitting images for the recognized images, all of which were higher than YOLOV5′s values, with 97.17% recall, an F1 score of 98.56%, and 64.42% non-underfitting. In this study, therefore, the Faster R-CNN algorithm works best.