Hemorrhagic stroke is the deadliest form of stroke and includes the subtypes of intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. A common cause of hemorrhagic stroke in older individuals is cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage both lead to the rapid collection of blood in the central nervous system and generate inflammatory immune responses that involve both brain resident and infiltrating immune cells. These responses are complex and can contribute to both tissue recovery and tissue injury. Despite the interconnectedness of these major subtypes of hemorrhagic stroke, few reviews have discussed them collectively. The present review provides an update on inflammatory processes that occur in response to intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and the role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of cerebral amyloid angiopathy–related hemorrhage. The goal is to highlight inflammatory processes that underlie disease pathology and recovery. We aim to discuss recent advances in our understanding of these conditions and identify gaps in knowledge with the potential to develop effective therapeutic strategies.

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a common small vessel disease in the elderly involving vascular amyloid-β deposition. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is one of the leading causes of intracerebral hemorrhage and a significant contributor to age-related cognitive decline. The awareness of a diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy is important in clinical practice as it impacts decisions to use lifelong anticoagulation or nonpharmacological alternatives to anticoagulation such as left atrial appendage closure in patients who have concurrent atrial fibrillation, another common condition in older adults. This review summarizes the latest literature regarding the management of patients with sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy, including diagnostic criteria, imaging biomarkers for cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity, and management strategies to decrease intracerebral hemorrhage risk. In a minority of patients, the presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy triggers an autoimmune inflammatory reaction, referred to as cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation, which is often responsive to immunosuppressive treatment in the acute phase. Diagnosis and management of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation will be presented separately. While there are currently no effective therapeutics available to cure or halt the progression of cerebral amyloid angiopathy, we discuss emerging avenues for potential future interventions.

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a small vessel disease associated with cortical microbleeds and lobar intracerebral haemorrhage due to amyloid-β deposition in the walls of leptomeningeal and cortical arterioles. The mechanisms of cerebral amyloid angiopathy–related haemorrhage remain largely unknown. Recent work has demonstrated that ruptured blood vessels have limited (or no) amyloid-β at the site of bleeding and evidence of local vascular remodelling. We hypothesized that blood–brain barrier leakage and perivascular inflammation may be involved in this remodelling process. This study examined cortical arterioles at various stages of cerebral amyloid angiopathy–related vascular pathology (without evidence of microhaemorrhage) in autopsy tissue from seven cases with definite cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We included temporo-occipital sections with microbleeds guided by ex vivo MRI from two cases with severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy and systematically sampled occipital sections from five consecutive cases with varying cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity. Haematoxylin and eosin stains and immunohistochemistry against amyloid-β, fibrin(ogen), smooth muscle actin, reactive astrocytes (glial fibrillary acidic protein) and activated microglia (cluster of differentiation 68) were performed. Arterioles were graded using a previously proposed scale of individual vessel cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity, and a blinded assessment for blood–brain barrier leakage, smooth muscle actin and perivascular inflammation was performed. Blood–brain barrier leakage and smooth muscle actin loss were observed in significantly more vessels with mild amyloid-β deposition (Grade 1 vessels; P = 0.044 and P = 0.012, respectively) as compared to vessels with no amyloid-β (Grade 0), and blood–brain barrier leakage was observed in 100% of vessels with evidence of vessel remodelling (Grades 3 and 4). Perivascular inflammation in the form of reactive astrocytes and activated microglia was observed predominantly surrounding arterioles at later stages of vessel pathology (Grades 2–4) and consistently around vessels with the same morphological features as ruptured vessel segments (Grade 4). These findings suggest a role for blood–brain barrier leakage and perivascular inflammation leading to arteriolar remodelling and haemorrhage in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, with early blood–brain barrier leakage as a potential trigger for subsequent perivascular inflammation.

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a cerebrovascular disease characterized by vascular amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition. CAA is often seen in the brains of elderly individuals and in a majority of patients with Alzheimer's disease. The molecular pathways triggered by vascular Aβ, causing vessel wall breakdown and ultimately leading to intracerebral haemorrhage and cognitive decline, remain poorly understood. The occurrence of CAA-related inflammation (CAA-ri) and Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) have sparked interest for a role of neuroinflammation in CAA pathogenesis. This review discusses prior studies of neuroinflammation in CAA and outlines potential future research directions targeting candidates such as matrix metalloproteinases, complement activation, microglial activation, reactive astrocytes and parenchymal border macrophages. Understanding the role of neuroinflammation in CAA pathogenesis could help identify new therapeutic strategies.

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States and worldwide, necessitating comprehensive efforts to optimize stroke risk factor management. Health disparities in stroke incidence, prevalence, and risk factor management persist among various race/ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic populations and negatively impact stroke outcomes. This review highlights existing literature and guidelines for stroke risk factor management, emphasizing health disparities among certain populations. Moreover, stroke risk factors for special groups, including the young, the very elderly, and pregnant/peripartum women are outlined. Strategies for stroke risk factor improvement at every level of the health care system are discussed, from the individual patient to providers, health care systems, and policymakers. Improving stroke risk factor management in the context of the social determinants of health, and with the goal of eliminating inequities and disparities in stroke prevention strategies, are critical steps to reducing the burden of stroke and equitably improving public health.

Anti-amyloid immunotherapies have recently emerged as treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. While these therapies have demonstrated efficacy in clearing amyloid-β and slowing cognitive decline, they have also been associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) which include both edema (ARIA-E) and hemorrhage (ARIA-H). Given that ARIA have been associated with significant morbidity in cases of antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy, an understanding of mechanisms of and risk factors for ARIA is of critical importance for stroke care. We discuss the latest data regarding mechanisms of ARIA, including the role of underlying cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and implications for ischemic stroke prevention and management.