Collaborative semen collection in monkeys is a valuable tool in research, animal collection management, and conservation efforts. To obtain samples, monkeys are often restrained in open restraint chairs (ORC) with the “pole and collar” technique. While commonly used, this restraint is not tolerated by all individuals; some become anxious or aggressive towards the poles and people. In an effort to refine this procedure and improve welfare of the monkeys, we examined the use of a “closed box chair” (CBC), a clear, plexiglass box in which the monkey is trained to sit for sperm collection. The CBC does not require pole and collar, and although legs are secured, the arms and neck are not restrained. The use of CBCs has increased in recent years; however, there are few studies demonstrating its effects on scientific outcomes. We used positive reinforcement techniques to train 34 adult male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to provide semen samples using either the ORC or the CBC. While all CBC monkeys (n = 14) were reliably trained for this procedure, only 75% of ORC (n = 20) males completed the training (p = 0.04). It took significantly less time to train animals in the CBC than the ORC (201.0 vs. 412.4 min; p <0.001). In a controlled subset, males restrained with ORC (n = 7) produced a significantly lower ejaculatory volume than those collected by CBC (n = 10) (297.6 µL vs. 522.1 µL respectively; p = 0.04) and had a lower concentration of sperm (186.0 × 10⁶/mL vs. 367.5 × 10⁶/mL respectively; p = 0.017), although there were no differences with respect to sperm motility (p = 0.15). Our data suggest the closed box chair technique reduces stress on the animals while enhancing semen quality, supporting the use of the CBC as an important refinement.

Obtaining quality oocytes is a prerequisite for ART-based studies. Here we describe a method for transabdominal ultrasound-guided (US) oocyte retrieval in rhesus macaques (Macaca mullata) and compare it to the standard surgical approach using laparoscopy (LAP). We analyzed oocyte yield from six continuous reproductive seasons (2017–2023) that included n = 177 US-guided and n = 136 laparoscopic oocyte retrievals. While the ultrasound-guided technique retrieved significantly fewer oocytes on average (LAP: 40 ± 2 vs. US: 27 ± 1), there was no difference in the number of mature metaphase II oocytes (MII) between the two techniques (LAP: 17 ± 1 vs. US: 15 ± 1). We show that oocytes retrieved by the ultrasound-guided approach fertilize at the same rates as those obtained via the laparoscopic procedure (LAP Fert Rate: 84% ± 2% vs. US Fert Rate: 83% ± 2%). In conclusion, minimally invasive ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval improves animal welfare while delivering equivalent numbers of mature oocytes, which are ideal for ART. Furthermore, we show that oocyte competency, as represented by fertilization rate, is not affected by retrieval technique. Therefore, the Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC) has adopted the ultrasound-guided approach as the standard technique for oocyte retrieval.

Advances in assisted reproductive technologies in rhesus macaques have allowed the development of valuable models of human disease, particularly when combined with recent techniques for gene editing. While the ability to perform in vitro fertilization (IVF) in rhesus macaques is well established, this procedure has not yet been optimized. Specifically, damage to the sperm caused by cryopreservation (cryodamage) may lead to unsuccessful artificial insemination and low fertilization and blastocyst formation rates in vitro. To address this, we systematically assessed 2 cryopreservation methods and 4 recovery methods in the following 3 interdependent experiments: 1) comparing sperm survival after vitrification or slow-freezing; 2) comparing simple wash (SW), density gradient centrifugation (DGC), swim-up (SU), and glass wool filtration (GWF) for removal of cryoprotectants and isolation of motile sperm after thawing; and 3) evaluating the efficacy for IVF of the 2 best methods of isolating thawed sperm. We found that after vitrification, only 1.2 ± 0.3% of thawed sperm were motile, whereas after slow-freezing, 42 ± 5% of thawed sperm were motile. SW was significantly better than all other isolation methods for the recovery of total sperm and for the recovery of sperm with an intact plasma membrane. The isolation methods had no significant differences in the recovery of motile sperm or sperm with progressive motility. However, IVF of ova with sperm recovered by DGC resulted in 5% more embryos and 25% more blastocysts than did IVF with sperm recovered by SW. Although additional studies are required to optimize sperm cryopreservation in rhesus macaques, our study showed that slow-freezing, coupled with DGC, provided the highest efficacy in providing functional sperm for in vitro use.

The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA) is a robust test with high repeatability and precision. It is a clinically accepted assay that defines risk for infertility in men by measuring the degree of DNA fragmentation (% DFI) in sperm. The objective of this study was to adapt and validate the SCSA for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and establish a range for % DFI in fertile males. Sperm samples from two different males were used to produce a % DFI validation curve before establishing a range using additional samples from n = 11 males. Sperm labeled with acridine orange were analyzed by flow cytometry to measure green fluorescence (native or intact DNA) and red fluorescence (fragmented DNA). Data were exported to FlowJo software to determine the % DFI for each sample. DNA fragmentation ranged from 0.1 to 2.4% DFI, with a mean ± SD = 1.1 ± 0.7% DFI (validation curve optimized to R² > 0.95). In conclusion, we were able to successfully validate the SCSA in our institution and establish the first normal range for sperm DNA fragmentation in rhesus macaques. Our study provides a quantitative baseline for future evaluations to assess macaque fertility through the SCSA test.

Junghyun Ryu, Fernanda C. Burch, Emily Mishler, Martha Neuringer, Jon D. Hennebold and Carol Hanna. Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2022;37:292-7. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.37.4.292