Aims: Our aim was to describe the electrocardiographic features of critical COVID-19 patients. Methods and results: We carried out a multicentric, cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of 431 consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized between 10 March and 14 April 2020 who died or were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. This project is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04367129). Standard ECG was recorded at hospital admission. ECG was abnormal in 93% of the patients. Atrial fibrillation/flutter was detected in 22% of the patients. ECG signs suggesting acute right ventricular pressure overload (RVPO) were detected in 30% of the patients. In particular, 43 (10%) patients had the S1Q3T3 pattern, 38 (9%) had incomplete right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 49 (11%) had complete RBBB. ECG signs of acute RVPO were not statistically different between patients with (n = 104) or without (n=327) invasive mechanical ventilation during ECG recording (36% vs. 28%, P = 0.10). Non-specific repolarization abnormalities and low QRS voltage in peripheral leads were present in 176 (41%) and 23 (5%), respectively. In four patients showing ST-segment elevation, acute myocardial infarction was confirmed with coronary angiography. No ST-T abnormalities suggestive of acute myocarditis were detected. In the subgroup of 110 patients where high-sensitivity troponin I was available, ECG features were not statistically different when stratified for above or below the 5 times upper reference limit value. Conclusions: The ECG is abnormal in almost all critically ill COVID-19 patients and shows a large spectrum of abnormalities, with signs of acute RVPO in 30% of the patients. Rapid and simple identification of these cases with ECG at hospital admission can facilitate classification of the patients and provide pathophysiological insights.

Aims: Prolonged right ventricular pacing (RVP) increases the risk of cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, heart failure (HF), and mortality. This registry-based trial compared left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) with RVP in patients younger than 65 years. Methods and results: Using the ConTempoRary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical practicE: lEft, BivEntriculAr, Right, and conDuction System Pacing (TREEBEARD) registry (NCT06324682), patients were randomized 1:1 to LBBAP or RVP. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and HF hospitalization (HFH); secondary endpoints included individual components and all-cause mortality. A total of 344 patients (mean age 58.5 years, 215 males, 172 per arm) were included. At 2 years, the primary composite endpoint occurred in 6.3% of LBBAP vs. 12.7% of RVP patients (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.59–0.87), representing a 22% risk reduction. Subgroup analyses aligned with primary findings. Left bundle branch area pacing significantly reduced HFH risk (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63–0.86) but showed no difference in CV mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79–1.32) or all-cause mortality (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72–1.38). Conclusion: Left bundle branch area pacing significantly lowered the 2-year composite of CV death and HFH compared to RVP in patients aged <65 years old. However, it did not reduce CV or all-cause mortality individually compared to RVP. Clinical Trial Registration: TREEBEARD (NCT06324682)

Background: Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are the most common form of ventricular arrhythmia in the general population. While in most cases PVCs represent a primitive phenomenon with benign behavior, in a non‐negligible proportion of subjects frequent PVCs may be epiphenomenon of underlying occult heart diseases, requiring special medical attention since they have been resulted linked to increased total and cardiac mortality. Nevertheless, PVCs themselves, when incessantly frequent, may be responsible for left ventricular dysfunction in otherwise normal heart. Aim of this narrative review is to update current knowledge on the general approach to patients with frequent PVCs on the basis of available data, with a special focus on the value of imaging.Hypothesis: Routine diagnostic work‐up not infrequently miss subtle concealed arrhythmic substrate, leading to erroneously refer to such arrhythmias as to “idiopathic”.Methods: Literature search of PVCs articles was conducted in PubMed and Scopus electronic database.Results: Conflicting data arise from literature about the true clinical significance of idiopathic PVCs. There is growing body of data providing evidence that more advanced non‐invasive imaging modalities, such as cardiac magnetic resonance, have an incremental diagnostic and prognostic value. On the other hand, in some cases the prognostic significance of isolated subtle myocardial structural abnormalities in patients with PVCs, still remains area of uncertainty.Conclusion: In selected subjects with PVCs and high‐risk features for concealed arrhythmic substrate, traditional assessment to rule out the presence of heart disease, including surface ECG and transthoracic echocardiography, should be implemented with more advanced cardiovascular imaging modalities.

The current narrative review provides an update of available knowledge on venous access techniques for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, with a focus on axillary vein puncture. Lower procedure-related and lead-related complications have been reported with extrathoracic vein puncture techniques compared with intrathoracic accesses. In particular, extrathoracic lead access through the axillary vein seems to be associated with lower complication incidence than subclavian vein puncture and higher success rate than cephalic vein cutdown. In literature, many techniques have been described for axillary vein access. The use of contrast venography-guided puncture has facilitated the diffusion of the axillary vein approach for device implantation. Venography may be particularly useful in specific demographic and clinical device implantation contexts. Ultrasound-guided or microwire-guided vascular access for lead positioning can be considered a valid alternative to venography, although current applications for axillary vein puncture need further evaluations.