Objective: To examine the effects of imperceptible levels of white noise galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) on dynamic walking stability in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP). Methods: Walking performance of 13 patients with confirmed BVP (mean age 50.1 ± 5.5 years) at slow, preferred, and fast speeds was examined during walking with zero-amplitude nGVS (sham trial) and nonzero-amplitude nGVS set to 80% of the individual cutaneous threshold for GVS (nGVS trial). Eight standard gait measures were analyzed: stride time, stride length, base of support, double support time percentage as well as the bilateral phase coordination index, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of stride time, stride length, and base of support. Results: Compared to the sham trial, nGVS improved stride time CV by 26.0% ± 8.4% (p < 0.041), stride length CV by 26.0% ± 7.7% (p < 0.029), base of support CV by 27.8% ± 2.9% (p < 0.037), and phase coordination index by 8.4% ± 8.8% (p < 0.013). The nGVS effects on walking performance were correlated with subjective ratings of walking balance (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.001). Effect of nGVS on walking stability was most pronounced during slow walking. Conclusions: In patients with BVP, nGVS is effective in improving impaired gait performance, predominantly during slower walking speeds. It primarily targets the variability and bilateral coordination characteristics of the walking pattern, which are linked to dynamic walking stability. nGVS might present an effective treatment option to immediately improve walking performance and reduce the incidence of falls in patients with BVP. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that in patients with BVP, an imperceptible level of nGVS improves dynamic walking stability.

Objective: To examine the triggering causes of inadequate neuromuscular regulation of posture and subjective imbalance in patients with phobic postural vertigo (PPV), a subtype of functional dizziness. Methods: Postural performance was assessed by center-of-pressure displacements and surface EMG of lower-limb muscles (the tibialis anterior and soleus) in 10 patients with PPV and 10 healthy controls under 4 stance conditions: standing with eyes open or closed and with or without an additional cognitive dual task. The level of muscle cocontraction and the characteristics of open- and closed-loop postural control were analyzed. Results: At baseline (i.e., standing with eyes open without dual task), patients exhibited increased muscle cocontractions (p = 0.003), which were further associated with increased open-loop diffusion activity (p = 0.022) and a lowering of the primary feedback threshold for closed-loop control (p = 0.003). However, postural performance of patients improved considerably and normalized to that of healthy controls when performing an additional dual task. Conclusions: PPV is characterized by a dissociation of subjective postural instability and objectively maintained balance capabilities. The dual-task effects on balance in patients with PPV indicate that this dissociation might result from an increased attention to postural adjustments at baseline, which is normally required only during demanding balance situations. This internal focus on balance control promotes an inappropriate neuromuscular regulation of posture, with increased muscle cocontractions, higher short-term body sway, and an oversensitivity to external stimuli. However, if patients are distracted, muscle cocontractions and balance control normalize. Such distraction may therefore be an effective coping strategy for preventing PPV attacks in susceptible patients.