Napoleon Torres

Dr. Napoleon Torres

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 June 2007 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BWBradley A. Wallace
Bradley A. Wallace
KAKeyoumars Ashkan
Keyoumars Ashkan
CHClaire E Heise
Claire E Heise
KFKelly D Foote
Kelly D Foote
NTNapoleon Torres
Napoleon Torres
ABAlim-Louis Benabid
Alim-Louis Benabid
We have examined dopaminergic cell survival after alteration of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated monkeys. The STN was lesioned with kainic acid (B series) or underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) at high frequency (C series). In another series, MPTP-treated and non-MPTP-treated monkeys had no STN alteration (intact animals; A series). Animals were treated with MPTP either after (B1, C1) or before (B2, C2) STN alteration. We also explored the long-term (∼7 months) effect of DBS in non-MPTP-treated monkeys (D series). Brains were aldehyde-fixed and processed for routine Nissl staining and tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry. Our results showed that there were significantly more (20–24%) dopaminergic cells in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) of the MPTP-treated monkeys that had STN alteration, either with kainic acid lesion or DBS, compared to the non-MPTP-treated monkeys (intact animals). We suggest that this saving or neuroprotection was due to a reduction in glutamate excitotoxicity, as a result of the loss or reduction of the STN input to the SNc. Our results also showed that SNc cell number in the B1 and C1 series were very similar to those in the B2 and C2 series. In the cases that had long-term DBS of the STN (D series), there was no adverse impact on SNc cell number. In summary, these results indicated that STN alteration offered neuroprotection to dopaminergic cells that would normally die as part of the disease process.

1 August 2014 in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DJDaniel Johnstone
Daniel Johnstone
NMN. el Massri
N. el Massri
CMC. Moro
C. Moro
SSS. Spana
S. Spana
XWX.S. Wang
X.S. Wang
JMJ. Mitrofanis
J. Mitrofanis

11 October 2015 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFannie Darlot
Fannie Darlot
CMCécile Moro
Cécile Moro
NMNabil El Massri
Nabil El Massri
CCClaude Chabrol
Claude Chabrol
DJDaniel M. Johnstone
Daniel M. Johnstone
ABAlim‐Louis Benabid
Alim‐Louis Benabid
Objective: To examine whether near‐infrared light (NIr) treatment reduces clinical signs and/or offers neuroprotection in a subacute 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) monkey model of Parkinson disease.Methods: We implanted an optical fiber device that delivered NIr (670nm) to the midbrain of macaque monkeys, close to the substantia nigra of both sides. MPTP injections (1.5–2.1mg/kg) were made over a 5‐ to 7‐day period, during which time the NIr device was turned on. This was then followed by a 3‐week survival period. Monkeys were evaluated clinically (eg, posture, bradykinesia) and behaviorally (open field test), and their brains were processed for immunohistochemistry and stereology.Results: All monkeys in the MPTP group developed severe clinical and behavioral impairment (mean clinical scores = 21–34; n = 11). By contrast, the MPTP‐NIr group developed much less clinical and behavioral impairment (n = 9); some monkeys developed moderate clinical signs (mean scores = 11–15; n = 3), whereas the majority—quite remarkably—developed few clinical signs (mean scores = 1–6; n = 6). The monkeys that developed moderate clinical signs had hematic fluid in their optical fibers at postmortem, presumably limiting NIr exposure and overall clinical improvement. NIr was not toxic to brain tissue and offered neuroprotection to dopaminergic cells and their terminations against MPTP insult, particularly in animals that developed few clinical signs.Interpretation: Our findings indicate NIr to be an effective therapeutic agent in a primate model of the disease and create the template for translation into clinical trials. ANN NEUROL 2016;79:59–75

1 March 2014 in Journal of Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCécile Moro
Cécile Moro
NMNabil El Massri
Nabil El Massri
NTNapoleon Torres
Napoleon Torres
DRDavid Ratel
David Ratel
XJXavier De Jaeger
Xavier De Jaeger
ABAlim-Louis Benabid
Alim-Louis Benabid
Object: Previous experimental studies have documented the neuroprotection of damaged or diseased cells after applying, from outside the brain, near-infrared light (NIr) to the brain by using external light-emitting diodes (LEDs) or laser devices. In the present study, the authors describe an effective and reliable surgical method of applying to the brain, from inside the brain, NIr to the brain. They developed a novel internal surgical device that delivers the NIr to brain regions very close to target damaged or diseased cells. They suggest that this device will be useful in applying NIr within the large human brain, particularly if the target cells have a very deep location. Methods: An optical fiber linked to an LED or laser device was surgically implanted into the lateral ventricle of BALB/c mice or Sprague-Dawley rats. The authors explored the feasibility of the internal device, measured the NIr signal through living tissue, looked for evidence of toxicity at doses higher than those required for neuroprotection, and confirmed the neuroprotective effect of NIr on dopaminergic cells in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) in an acute 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) model of Parkinson disease in mice. Results: The device was stable in freely moving animals, and the NIr filled the cranial cavity. Measurements showed that the NIr intensity declined as distance from the source increased across the brain (65% per mm) but was detectable up to 10 mm away. At neuroprotective (0.16 mW) and much higher (67 mW) intensities, the NIr caused no observable behavioral deficits, nor was there evidence of tissue necrosis at the fiber tip, where radiation was most intense. Finally, the intracranially delivered NIr protected SNc cells against MPTP insult; there were consistently more dopaminergic cells in MPTP-treated mice irradiated with NIr than in those that were not irradiated. Conclusions: In summary, the authors showed that NIr can be applied intracranially, does not have toxic side effects, and is neuroprotective.

1 January 2009
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
ABAlim Louis Benabid
Alim Louis Benabid
SCStephan Chabardes
Stephan Chabardes
NTNapoleon Torres
Napoleon Torres
BPBrigitte Piallat
Brigitte Piallat
PKPaul Krack
Paul Krack
PPPierre Pollak
Pierre Pollak

1 February 2009 in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPB. Piallat
B. Piallat
SCS. Chabardès
S. Chabardès
NTNapoleon Torres
Napoleon Torres
VFV. Fraix
V. Fraix
LGL. Goetz
L. Goetz
ABA.L. Benabid
A.L. Benabid