Lourens Robbers

Dr. Lourens Robbers

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 June 2022 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRoel S Driessen
Roel S Driessen
PDPepijn A van Diemen
Pepijn A van Diemen
PRPieter G Raijmakers
Pieter G Raijmakers
JKJuhani Knuuti
Juhani Knuuti
TMTeemu Maaniitty
Teemu Maaniitty
PKPaul Knaapen
Paul Knaapen
Aims: The diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging in patients with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been tested in prospective head-to-head comparative studies. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of qualitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative positron emission tomography (PET), and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a prior myocardial infarction (MI) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results: In this prospective clinical study, all patients with prior MI and/or PCI and new symptoms of ischaemic CAD underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT, [15O]H2O PET, and MRI, followed by invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all coronary arteries. All modalities were interpreted by core laboratories. Haemodynamically significant CAD was defined by at least one coronary artery with an FFR ≤0.80. Among the 189 enrolled patients, 63% had significant CAD. Sensitivity was 67% (95% confidence interval 58–76%) for SPECT, 81% (72–87%) for PET, and 66% (56–75%) for MRI. Specificity was 61% (48–72%) for SPECT, 65% (53–76%) for PET, and 62% (49–74%) for MRI. Sensitivity of PET was higher than SPECT (P = 0.016) and MRI (P = 0.014), whereas specificity did not differ among the modalities. Diagnostic accuracy for PET (75%, 68–81%) did not statistically differ from SPECT (65%, 58–72%, P = 0.03) and MRI (64%, 57–72%, P = 0.052). Using FFR < 0.75 as a reference, accuracies increased to 69% (SPECT), 79% (PET), and 71% (MRI). Conclusion: In this prospective head-to-head comparative study, SPECT, PET, and MRI did not show a significantly different accuracy for diagnosing FFR defined significant CAD in patients with prior PCI and/or MI. Overall diagnostic performances, however, were discouraging and the additive value of non-invasive imaging in this high-risk population is questionable.

1 November 2022 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAhmet Demirkiran
Ahmet Demirkiran
LRLourens Robbers
Lourens Robbers
NHNina W. van der Hoeven
Nina W. van der Hoeven
HEHenk Everaars
Henk Everaars
LHLuuk H.G.A. Hopman
Luuk H.G.A. Hopman
RNRobin Nijveldt
Robin Nijveldt
Background: The invasive microvascular function indices, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), exhibit a dynamic pattern after ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. The effects of microvascular injury on the evolution of the microvascular function and the prognostic significance of the evolution of microvascular function are unknown. We investigated the relationship between the temporal changes of CFR and IMR, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived microvascular injury characteristics in reperfused ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients, and their association with 1-month left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size (IS). Methods: In 109 ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients who underwent angiography for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and at 1-month follow-up, invasive assessment of CFR and IMR were performed in the culprit artery during both procedures. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed 2 to 7 days after PPCI and at 1 month and provided assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction, IS, microvascular obstruction, and intramyocardial hemorrhage. Results: CFR and IMR significantly changed over 1 month (both, P <0.001). The absolute IMR change over 1 month (ΔIMR) showed association with both microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial hemorrhage presence (both, P =0.01). ΔIMR differed between patients with/without microvascular obstruction ( P =0.02) and with/without intramyocardial hemorrhage ( P =0.04) but not ΔCFR for both. ΔIMR demonstrated association with both left ventricular ejection fraction and IS at 1 month ( P 50% and extensive IS (the highest quartile). Conclusions: In reperfused ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients, CFR and IMR significantly improved 1 month after PPCI; the temporal change in IMR is closely related to the presence/absence of microvascular damage and IS. ΔIMR exhibits a stronger association for 1-month functional outcome than post-PPCI CFR, IMR, or ΔCFR.

9 October 2023 in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAhmet Demirkiran
Ahmet Demirkiran
CBCasper W H Beijnink
Casper W H Beijnink
RKRobert A Kloner
Robert A Kloner
LHLuuk H G A Hopman
Luuk H G A Hopman
NHNina W van der Hoeven
Nina W van der Hoeven
RNRobin Nijveldt
Robin Nijveldt
We examined the association between the symptom-to-reperfusion-time and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived global strain parameters and transmural infarct extent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The study included 108 STEMI patients who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Patients were categorized according to the median symptom-to-reperfusion-time: shorter (160 min, n = 54). CMR was performed 2–7 days after PPCI and at 1 month. CMR cine imaging was performed for functional assessment and late gadolinium enhancement to evaluate transmural infarct extent. Myocardial feature-tracking was used for strain analysis. Groups were comparable in relation to incidence of LAD disease and pre- and post-PPCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades. The mean transmural extent score at follow-up was lower in patients with shorter reperfusion time (P < 0.01). Both baseline and follow-up maximum transmural extent scores were smaller in patients with shorter reperfusion time (P = 0.03 for both). Patients with shorter reperfusion time had more favourable global left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain (baseline, P = 0.049; follow-up, P = 0.01) and radial strain (baseline, P = 0.047; follow-up, P < 0.01), whilst LV longitudinal strain appeared comparable for both baseline and follow-up (P > 0.05 for both). In multi-variable regression analysis including all three strain directions, baseline LV circumferential strain was independently associated with the mean transmural extent score at follow-up (β=1.89, P < 0.001). In STEMI patients, time-to-reperfusion was significantly associated with smaller transmural extent of infarction and better LV circumferential and radial strain. Moreover, infarct transmurality and residual LV circumferential strain are closely linked. The representation of global left ventricular (LV) strain findings according to reperfusion delay is illustrated in the following manner: the baseline (BL) and follow-up (FU) global LV strain results of patients with shorter reperfusion time are presented on the left side, whilst the results of patients with longer reperfusion time are shown on the right side. Longitudinal strain findings are displayed using corresponding strain colour maps on a four-chamber view, along with strain time curves at BL and FU. Circumferential and radial strain findings are visualized through corresponding strain colour maps on short-axis views, with strain time curves at BL and FU. BL longitudinal strain values seem comparable between patients with shorter and longer reperfusion time. However, both circumferential and radial strain values appear markedly more favourable in patients who have a shorter reperfusion time. Furthermore, strain results in all directions (e.g. longitudinal) demonstrate improvement over time (BL to FU) in both patient groups (shorter and longer reperfusion time).

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLuuk H.G.A. Hopman
Luuk H.G.A. Hopman
AZAlwin Zweerink
Alwin Zweerink
ALAnne-Lotte C. J. van der Lingen
Anne-Lotte C. J. van der Lingen
MHMarthe J. Huntelaar
Marthe J. Huntelaar
MMMark J. Mulder
Mark J. Mulder
CACornelis P. Allaart
Cornelis P. Allaart
Objectives: This prospective pilot study assessed the feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging during biventricular (BIV) pacing in patients with a CMR conditional cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and compared the results with invasive volume measurements. Methods: Ten CRT-D patients underwent CMR imaging prior to device implantation (baseline) and six weeks after device implantation, including CRT-on and CRT-off modes. Left ventricular (LV) function, volumes, and strain measurements of LV dyssynchrony and dyscoordination were assessed. Invasive pressure–volume measurements were performed, matching the CRT settings used during CMR. Results: Post-implantation imaging enabled reliable cine assessment, but showed artefacts on late gadolinium enhancement images. After six weeks of CRT, significant reverse remodeling was observed, with a 22.7 ± 11% reduction in LV end-systolic volume during intrinsic rhythm (CRT-off). During CRT-on, the LV ejection fraction significantly improved from 27.4 ± 5.9% to 32.2 ± 8.7% (p < 0.01), and the strain assessment showed the abolition of the left bundle branch block contraction pattern. Invasively measured and CMR-assessed LV hemodynamics during BIV pacing were significantly associated. Conclusions: Post-CRT implantation CMR assessing acute LV pump function is feasible and provides important insights into the effects of BIV pacing on cardiac function and contraction patterns. LV assessment during CMR may constitute a future CRT optimization strategy.

6 July 2023 in European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MFMitchell D. Fiet
Mitchell D. Fiet
BABouchra Azouz
Bouchra Azouz
LRLourens Robbers
Lourens Robbers
HNHans W. M. Niessen
Hans W. M. Niessen
PKPaul A. J. Krijnen
Paul A. J. Krijnen

1 November 2024 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TMTimion A. Meijs
Timion A. Meijs
JHJosephine F. Heidendael
Josephine F. Heidendael
BSBernadette Schurink
Bernadette Schurink
MBMarianna Bugiani
Marianna Bugiani
WBWim Jan P. van Boven
Wim Jan P. van Boven
LRLourens Robbers
Lourens Robbers