It is now just over 2 yr since Marhofer and colleagues,
1 in this journal, reviewed the use of ultrasound in regional anaesthesia. They concluded with the hope that the availability of portable ultrasound systems with high-frequency probes would promote the routine use of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. This review, however, was accompanied by an editorial that queried the evidence base for preferring ultrasound guidance to other techniques of nerve localization.
2 With the widespread availability to anaesthetists of high-resolution portable ultrasound machines,
3 it is timely to consider if sufficient evidence has accumulated to quell the doubts expressed by Denny and Harrop-Griffiths.
2