Spinal disorders are some of the most prevalent health concerns, especially among students. Based on student demographics, this cross-sectional study evaluated the correlation between functional tests (FTs) and spinal range of motion (ROM). This study included 206 students (age = 19.85 ± 1.80 years) from the Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacău. Participants’ assessments were conducted using the following tests: (i) Ott, (ii) Schober, (iii) Stibor, (iv) finger-to-floor distance, (v) lateral flexion of the cervical and lumbar spine, and (vi) flexion of the cervical spine. Correlation analyses were evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient analysis. The results indicated a very strong relationship between lateral flexion of the lumbar spine on the left (LFLSL) and right (LFLSR) for all departments (r = 0.85 to 0.97, p < 0.05). There was a stronger relationship between FT results and spinal ROM for physical-education-department students compared to students from other departments (n = 17, r = −0.38 to 0.93, p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between FTs and spinal ROM based on age (p > 0.05). The study results provide evidence of the primary risk factors that predispose students to postural deviations. Practitioners and physiotherapists can utilize these values as a reference for potential therapeutic interventions.

(1) Background: This study aimed to examine the differences in the kinetic energy of the body’s center of mass between successful and unsuccessful attempts at transitioning from a basket to a handstand on the parallel bars. Special attention was given to the analysis of kinetic energy as a key factor in the efficient execution of this complex element. (2) Methods: The sample consisted of 10 successful and 10 unsuccessful attempts performed by an elite gymnast (a multiple-medalist in World and European Championships). All attempts and kinematic data were recorded and analyzed using high-frequency cameras (300 Hz) and the Ariel Performance 3D video system, respectively. Successful and unsuccessful performances were compared using a paired-sample t-test. (3) Results: Significant differences in kinetic energy were observed in the first part of the anti-gravitational phase of movement between successful and unsuccessful attempts. Successful attempts demonstrated a more favorable position at the beginning of this phase, allowing better utilization of accumulated kinetic energy—a higher position of the feet and hips, and a smaller shoulder joint angle at the moment the shoulder passed through the lower vertical. (4) Conclusions: Successful attempts in gymnastics are characterized by better biomechanical optimization and efficient kinetic energy use, achieved through an earlier entry into the second phase of movement with optimal body positioning, leading to greater peripheral and angular velocities crucial for performance.

(1) Background: Physical activity (PA) plays a crucial role in preserving and enhancing mental health, particularly in the aftermath of major health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the specific levels and domains of physical activity that have the greatest impact on alleviating symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress in the post-COVID-19 period remain unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of different levels and domains of PA on mental health parameters, specifically symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress, in individuals who had recovered from COVID-19. (2) Methods: The study included initial measurements (2–4 weeks post-recovery) and final measurements (14–16 weeks post-recovery). The sample comprised 288 participants aged 20 to 60 years (M = 47.06; SD = 12.41), with 95 men and 193 women. PA was assessed using the long version of the IPAQ questionnaire, while mental health was evaluated using the long version of the DASS scale. (3) Results: Stepwise regression analysis revealed that low- (p = 0.010) and moderate-intensity (p = 0.022) PA was significantly associated with reductions in anxiety symptoms as well as lower stress levels (low PA: p = 0.014; moderate PA: p = 0.042). Total PA (p < 0.001) and vigorous-intensity PA (p = 0.008) emerged as significant predictors of reduced depression levels. Among the domains of PA, home-based activities had a statistically significant impact on all three mental health components: anxiety (p = 0.005), depression (p = 0.002), and stress (p = 0.041). Transport-related PA was significantly associated with anxiety (p = 0.011) and stress (p = 0.022), but not with depression. (4) Conclusions: The results suggest that a combined model incorporating different levels and domains of PA may represent an effective approach to improving mental health in individuals recovering from COVID-19. Further longitudinal studies are needed to establish more precise causal relationships.

Background: Psychological determinants are increasingly recognized as central contributors to both performance decline and recovery in competitive sport; however, contemporary evidence integrating injury-related and non-injury performance contexts remains fragmented. Objective: This systematic review synthesized empirical evidence (2016–2025) examining psychological determinants associated with return to sport (RTS), reinjury risk, burnout, injury incidence, and performance decline among competitive athletes. Methods: Conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus identified peer-reviewed studies published between January 2016 and December 2025. Eligibility criteria were defined using a PICO framework. Prospective cohort studies, longitudinal multi-wave investigations, one randomized controlled trial, matched cohort studies, diary-based designs, and injury-related observational studies were included. Due to heterogeneity in constructs and outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including prospective cohort studies, multi-wave longitudinal designs, one randomized controlled trial, one matched cohort study, and a diary-based investigation. Seven independent cohorts examined psychological readiness using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (sample sizes ranging from n = 39 to n = 384), consistently demonstrating that higher readiness predicted successful RTS at 6–24 months, while two prospective studies reported contrasting associations with second ACL injury risk. Four longitudinal studies (n = 93–491) showed that increased burnout and controlled motivation predicted performance decline and dropout trajectories, whereas higher resilience and mental toughness reduced burnout progression. One seasonal longitudinal study (n = 21) linked elevated cognitive anxiety and mood disturbance to increased injury incidence. Conclusion: Psychological determinants operate across deterioration and restoration pathways. Psychological readiness shows the strongest predictive consistency for RTS, while burnout, motivational climate, and resilience significantly shape long-term performance sustainability and injury-related outcomes.

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a major contributor to global disability. Exercise-based rehabilitation is widely recommended as first-line management; however, in clinical practice, it is frequently combined with adjunct therapeutic modalities, and the incremental effectiveness of these approaches remains unclear. The present review addressed the research question: Do adjunct modalities provide additional benefits beyond exercise-based rehabilitation alone in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders? Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD420261309183). Electronic searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify controlled clinical trials evaluating exercise-based rehabilitation delivered alone or combined with adjunct modalities. Outcomes included pain, functional disability, physical performance, strength, structural or imaging-based measures, biomechanical variables, injury risk, and work-related outcomes. Due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, a structured narrative and tabular synthesis were performed. Results: Twenty-one controlled clinical trials were included, encompassing tendinopathies (n = 7), knee osteoarthritis (n = 5), post-ACL reconstruction (n = 2), chronic spinal pain (n = 3), sarcopenia (n = 2), low bone mass (n = 2), and occupational musculoskeletal conditions (n = 1), with sample sizes ranging from 22 to 823 participants. Pain outcomes were reported in 18 studies (86%) and functional outcomes in 16 studies (76%). Exercise-based rehabilitation consistently produced clinically meaningful improvements across studies, whereas adjunct modalities demonstrated short-term advantages in a limited number of trials but rarely showed sustained long-term superiority. Conclusions: Evidence from controlled clinical trials indicates that exercise-based rehabilitation is an effective primary intervention for improving pain, functional capacity, and physical performance across diverse musculoskeletal conditions. Adjunct modalities may provide condition-specific or short-term benefits but do not consistently enhance long-term outcomes beyond structured exercise programs.