Carolyn Brown

Prof. Carolyn Brown

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 April 2011 in Molecular Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEwan A Gibb
Ewan A Gibb
CBCarolyn Brown
Carolyn Brown
WLWan L Lam
Wan L Lam
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as new players in the cancer paradigm demonstrating potential roles in both oncogenic and tumor suppressive pathways. These novel genes are frequently aberrantly expressed in a variety of human cancers, however the biological functions of the vast majority remain unknown. Recently, evidence has begun to accumulate describing the molecular mechanisms by which these RNA species function, providing insight into the functional roles they may play in tumorigenesis. In this review, we highlight the emerging functional role of lncRNAs in human cancer.

1 January 1991 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCarolyn Brown
Carolyn Brown
ABAndrea Ballabio
Andrea Ballabio
JRJames L. Rupert
James L. Rupert
RLRonald G. Lafreniere
Ronald G. Lafreniere
MGMarkus Grompe
Markus Grompe
HWHuntington F. Willard
Huntington F. Willard

1 October 1992 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBCarolyn Brown
Carolyn Brown
BHBrian D. Hendrich
Brian D. Hendrich
JRJim L. Rupert
Jim L. Rupert
RLRonald G. Lafrenière
Ronald G. Lafrenière
YXYigong Xing
Yigong Xing
HWHuntington F. Willard
Huntington F. Willard
X chromosome inactivation in mammalian females results in the cis-limited transcriptional inactivity of most of the genes on one X chromosome. The XIST gene is unique among X-linked genes in being expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome. Human XIST cDNAs containing at least eight exons and totaling 17 kb have been isolated and sequenced within the region on the X chromosome known to contain the X inactivation center. The XIST gene includes several tandem repeats, the most 5' of which are evolutionarily conserved. The gene does not contain any significant conserved ORFs and thus does not appear to encode a protein, suggesting that XIST may function as a structural RNA within the nucleus. Consistent with this, fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments demonstrate localization of XIST RNA within the nucleus to a position indistinguishable from the X inactivation-associated Barr body.

1 October 1991 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BFBrunella Franco
Brunella Franco
SGSilvana Guioli
Silvana Guioli
APAntonella Pragliola
Antonella Pragliola
BIBarbara Incerti
Barbara Incerti
Barbara BardoniBarbara Bardoni
Barbara Bardoni
ABAndrea Ballabio
Andrea Ballabio

3 March 2013 in Epigenetics & Chromatin
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPE Magda Price
E Magda Price
ACAllison M Cotton
Allison M Cotton
LLLucia L Lam
Lucia L Lam
PFPau Farré
Pau Farré
EEEldon Emberly
Eldon Emberly
MKMichael Kobor
Michael Kobor
Background: Measurement of genome-wide DNA methylation (DNAm) has become an important avenue for investigating potential physiologically-relevant epigenetic changes. Illumina Infinium (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) is a commercially available microarray suite used to measure DNAm at many sites throughout the genome. However, it has been suggested that a subset of array probes may give misleading results due to issues related to probe design. To facilitate biologically significant data interpretation, we set out to enhance probe annotation of the newest Infinium array, the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (450 k), with >485,000 probes covering 99% of Reference Sequence (RefSeq) genes (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda, MD, USA). Annotation that was added or expanded on includes: 1) documented SNPs in the probe target, 2) probe binding specificity, 3) CpG classification of target sites and 4) gene feature classification of target sites. Results: Probes with documented SNPs at the target CpG (4.3% of probes) were associated with increased within-tissue variation in DNAm. An example of a probe with a SNP at the target CpG demonstrated how sample genotype can confound the measurement of DNAm. Additionally, 8.6% of probes mapped to multiple locations in silico. Measurements from these non-specific probes likely represent a combination of DNAm from multiple genomic sites. The expanded biological annotation demonstrated that based on DNAm, grouping probes by an alternative high-density and intermediate-density CpG island classification provided a distinctive pattern of DNAm. Finally, variable enrichment for differentially methylated probes was noted across CpG classes and gene feature groups, dependant on the tissues that were compared. Conclusion: DNAm arrays offer a high-throughput approach for which careful consideration of probe content should be utilized to better understand the biological processes affected. Probes containing SNPs and non-specific probes may affect the assessment of DNAm using the 450 k array. Additionally, probe classification by CpG enrichment classes and to a lesser extent gene feature groups resulted in distinct patterns of DNAm. Thus, we recommend that compromised probes be removed from analyses and that the genomic context of DNAm is considered in studies deciphering the biological meaning of Illumina 450 k array data.

1 January 2007 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWKendy K. Wong
Kendy K. Wong
RDRonald J. Deleeuw
Ronald J. Deleeuw
NDNirpjit S. Dosanjh
Nirpjit S. Dosanjh
LKLindsey R. Kimm
Lindsey R. Kimm
ZCZe Cheng
Ze Cheng
WLWan L. Lam
Wan L. Lam