Werner Güth

Prof. Werner Güth


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 March 2007 in Experimental Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMax Albert
Max Albert
WGWerner Güth
Werner Güth
EKErich Kirchler
Erich Kirchler
BMBoris Maciejovsky
Boris Maciejovsky
We experimentally investigate whether individuals can reliably detect cooperators (the nice(r) people) in an anonymous decision environment involving “connected games.” Participants can condition their choices in an asymmetric prisoners’ dilemma and a trust game on past individual (their partner's donation share to a self-selected charity) and social (whether their partner belongs to a group with high or low average donations) information. Thus, the two measures of niceness are the individual donation share in the donation task, and the cooperativeness of one's choice in the two games. We find that high donors achieve a higher-than-average expected payoff by cooperating predominantly with other high donors. Group affiliation proved to be irrelevant.

28 July 2007 in Economic Inquiry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WGWerner Güth
Werner Güth
MLM. Vittoria Levati
M. Vittoria Levati
MPMatteo Ploner
Matteo Ploner

8 May 2008 in Public Choice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSusanne Büchner
Susanne Büchner
AFAndreas Freytag
Andreas Freytag
LGLuis G. González
Luis G. González
WGWerner Güth
Werner Güth

9 September 2011 in Games
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCThorsten Chmura
Thorsten Chmura
WGWerner Güth
Werner Güth
We report experimental results on the minority of three-game, where three players choose one of two alternatives and the most rewarding alternative is the one chosen by a single player. This coordination game has many asymmetric equilibria in pure strategies that are non-strict and payoff-asymmetric and a unique symmetric mixed strategy equilibrium in which each player’s behavior is based on the toss of a fair coin. This straightforward behavior is predicted by equilibrium selection, impulse-balance equilibrium, and payoff-sampling equilibrium. Experimental participants rely on various decision rules, and only a quarter of them perfectly randomize.

22 April 2010 in Games
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WGWerner Güth
Werner Güth
KPKerstin Pull
Kerstin Pull
MSManfred Stadler
Manfred Stadler
ASAgnes Stribeck
Agnes Stribeck
In two-person generosity games, the proposer’s agreement payoff is exogenously given, whereas that of the responder is endogenously determined by the proposer’s choice of the pie size. In three-person generosity games, equal agreement payoffs for two of the players are either exogenously excluded or imposed. We predict that the latter crowds out - or at least weakens - efficiency seeking. Our treatments rely on a 2x3 factorial design, differing in whether the responder or the third (dummy) player is the residual claimant and whether the proposer’s agreement payoff is larger, equal, or smaller than the other exogenously given agreement payoff.

23 May 2007 in Theory and Decision
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WGWerner Güth
Werner Güth
FMFriederike Mengel
Friederike Mengel
AOAxel Ockenfels
Axel Ockenfels