Culture-dependent and culture-independent microbiological methods are two approaches used to study microbial community composition. Culture-dependent methods have been the standard method used for many years but have limited utility with unculturable microorganisms. Culture-independent methods, including molecular techniques, enable direct analysis of microbial DNA without requiring cultivation. Both culture-dependent and -independent methods have roles in advancing our understanding of microbiology, and a combination of these approaches often yields a comprehensive depiction of the microbial diversity within a dynamic system. Bacterial activity reaction tests (BARTs) are a common culture-dependent test used to identify bacteria growing in industrial water samples. In this study, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to identify the taxa growing in BARTs and compared with the BART reaction patterns. Additionally, several water samples were analyzed by both BART and NGS analysis to determine whether the bacteria found in the water were also present in the BARTs. The results showed overall agreement between NGS and BARTs, though, in some cases, the most abundant taxa found in the water samples differed from those in the BARTs. This highlights the need for further study into the microbial community dynamics of culture-dependent tests to determine whether they are representative of the original sample.

Legionella is a bacterial genus found in natural aquatic environments, as well as domestic and industrial water systems. Legionella presents potential human health risks when aerosolized and inhaled by at-risk individuals and is commonly monitored at locations with likelihood of proliferation and human exposure. Legionella monitoring is widely performed using culture-based testing, which faces limitations including turnaround time and interferences. Molecular biology methodologies, including quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), are being explored to supplement or replace culture-based testing because of faster turnaround and lower detection limits, allowing for more rapid water remediation measures. In this study, three methods were compared by testing industrial water samples: culture-based testing by a certified lab, high throughput qPCR testing (HT qPCR), and field deployable low throughput qPCR testing (LT qPCR). The qPCR test methods reported more positive results than culture testing, indicating improved sensitivity and specificity. The LT qPCR test is portable with quick turnaround times, and can be leveraged for environmental surveillance, process optimization, monitoring, and onsite case investigations. The LT qPCR test had high negative predictive value and would be a useful tool for negative screening of Legionella samples from high-risk environments and/or outbreak investigations to streamline samples for culture testing. This study compared three test methods for Legionella to evaluate performance of a low throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction (LT qPCR) test for Legionella that can be used onsite; the study found that the high throughput (HT) and LT qPCR tests used in this study gave more positive results than culture testing, and the results indicated a similar negative predictive value for the HT and LT qPCR tests, supporting that the LT qPCR method could be useful for negative screening of Legionella samples in industrial water systems onsite.