The treatment of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis relies on complex antibiotic therapy. Inadequate antibiotic exposure can lead to treatment failure, acquired drug resistance, and an increased risk of adverse events. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be used to optimize the antibiotic exposure. Therefore, we aimed to develop a single-run multiplex assay using high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) for TDM of patients with multidrug-resistant, pre-extensively drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. A target profile for sufficient performance, based on the intended clinical application, was established and the assay was developed accordingly. Antibiotics were analyzed on a zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer using stable isotope-labeled internal standards. The assay was sufficiently sensitive to monitor drug concentrations over five half-lives for rifampicin, rifabutin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, terizidone/cycloserine, ethambutol, delamanid, pyrazinamide, meropenem, prothionamide, and para-amino salicylic acid (PAS). Accuracy and precision were sufficient to support clinical decision making (≤±15% in clinical samples and ±20–25% in spiked samples, with 80% of future measured concentrations predicted to fall within ±40% of nominal concentrations). The method was applied in the TDM of two patients with complex drug-resistant tuberculosis. All relevant antibiotics from their regimens could be quantified and high-dose therapy was initiated, followed by microbiological conversion. In conclusion, we developed a multiplex assay that enables TDM of the relevant first- and second-line anti-tuberculosis medicines in a single run and was able to show its applicability in TDM of two drug-resistant tuberculosis patients.
Emerging multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is a major global health challenge. The World Health Organization currently recommends treatment durations of 9–18 months or more for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. We identified and validated a host-RNA signature to serve as a biomarker for individualized therapy durations for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Adult patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were prospectively enrolled into 5 independent cohorts in Germany and Romania. Clinical and microbiological data, and whole-blood for RNA transcriptomic analysis were collected at pre-defined timepoints throughout therapy. Treatment outcomes were ascertained one year after end-of-therapy. A whole-blood RNA therapy end model was developed in a multi-step process involving a machine-learning algorithm to identify hypothetical individual end-of-treatment timepoints. Fifty patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis and 30 patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were recruited in the German identification cohorts (DS- and MDR-GIC), 28 patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis and 32 patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the German validation cohorts (DS- and MDR-GVC), and 52 patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the Romanian validation cohort (MDR-RVC). A 22-gene RNA model that defined cure-associated end-of-therapy timepoints was derived from the DS- and MDR-GIC data. The model accurately predicted clinical outcomes for patients in the DS-GVC (AUC=0.937 [95%CI:0.899–0.976]) and suggested that cure may be achieved with shorter treatment durations for tuberculosis patients in the MDR-GIC (mean reduction 218.0 days, 34.2%, p<0.001), the MDR-GVC (mean reduction 211.0 days, 32.9%, p<0.001), and the MDR-RVC (mean reduction of 161.0 days, 23.4%, p=0.001). Biomarker-guided management may substantially shorten the duration of therapy for many patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. One Sentence Summary: We identified and validated a transcriptome model based on a 22-gene signature to predict individual treatment durations for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
This prospective study investigated whole blood-based immune cell biomarkers for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) immunoprofiling. Blood samples from 34 healthy controls and 51 tuberculosis patients were analyzed at three timepoints: Prior to therapy (T0), after 14 days of therapy (T1), and at the end of treatment (Te). Using multiparameter flow cytometry, 386 immune cell populations were analyzed. Predictive models were developed using two machine learning algorithms. A TB5 LF change score, which was based on five cell populations, effectively distinguished tuberculosis patients from controls (AUC = 0.89) and tuberculosis patients before and at the end of treatment (AUC = 0.92). Similarly, the TB5 Lasso score distinguished tuberculosis patients from controls (AUC = 0.91) and tuberculosis patients before and at the end of treatment (AUC = 0.93) but was inversely correlated with disease severity (r=–0.43). Both scores included PD-L1 + CD80 - neutrophils and PD-L1 + HLA-DR + CD4 + lymphocytes, highlighting PD-L1-associated and Th1-related immune signatures as candidate biomarkers for TB immunoprofiling. These findings are exploratory and hypothesis-generating, providing a basis for future studies evaluating their potential utility in diagnostic and therapy-monitoring contexts.