Background: Dysfunctional breathing is increasingly recognised after SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the associated symptoms, functional impact and quality of life have not been systematically studied. Methods: This study describes a prospective case series of 48 patients with dysfunctional breathing based on compatible symptoms and an abnormal breathing pattern during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Patients with underlying disease that could explain these symptoms were excluded. Median time from COVID-19 to evaluation was 212 (IQR 121) days. Self-administered questionnaires, including the Nijmegen questionnaire, Short-Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, modified Medical Research Council scale, post-COVID-19 Functional Scale, and specific long COVID symptoms, were the outcome measures. Results: On average, mean V’O₂ was preserved. Pulmonary function tests were within limits of normality. Hyperventilation, periodic deep sighs/erratic breathing and mixed types of dysfunctional breathing were diagnosed in 20.8%, 47.1% and 33.3% of patients, respectively. After dyspnoea, the five most frequent symptoms using the Nijmegen scale with a cut-off of ≥3 were faster/deeper breathing (75.6%), palpitations (63.8%), sighs (48.7%), unable to breathe deeply (46.3%) and yawning (46.2%). Median Nijmegen and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were 28 (IQR 20) and 16.5 (IQR 11), respectively. SF-36 scores were lower than the reference value. Conclusions: Long COVID patients with dysfunctional breathing have a high burden of symptoms, functional impact and a low quality of life, despite no or negligible organic damage.

Background: Lung function impairment persists in some patients for months after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Long-term lung function, radiological features, and their association remain to be clarified. Objectives: We aimed to prospectively investigate lung function and radiological abnormalities over 12 months after severe and non-severe COVID-19. Methods: 584 patients were included in the Swiss COVID-19 lung study. We assessed lung function at 3, 6, and 12 months after acute COVID-19 and compared chest computed tomography (CT) imaging to lung functional abnormalities. Results: At 12 months, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCOcorr) was lower after severe COVID-19 compared to non-severe COVID-19 (74.9% vs. 85.2% predicted, p < 0.001). Similarly, minimal oxygen saturation on 6-min walk test and total lung capacity were lower after severe COVID-19 (89.6% vs. 92.2%, p = 0.004, respectively, 88.2% vs. 95.1% predicted, p = 0.011). The difference for forced vital capacity (91.6% vs. 96.3% predicted, p = 0.082) was not statistically significant. Between 3 and 12 months, lung function improved in both groups and differences in DLCO between non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients decreased. In patients with chest CT scans at 12 months, we observed a correlation between radiological abnormalities and reduced lung function. While the overall extent of radiological abnormalities diminished over time, the frequency of mosaic attenuation and curvilinear patterns increased. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study, patients who had severe COVID-19 had diminished lung function over the first year compared to those after non-severe COVID-19, albeit with a greater extent of recovery in the severe disease group.

The Swiss COPD cohort was established in 2006 to collect data in a primary care setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate possible predictive factors for exacerbation and re-exacerbation. In order to predict exacerbation until the next visit based on the knowledge of exacerbation since the last visit, a multistate model described by Therneau and Grambsch was performed. Data of 1,247 patients (60.4% males, 46.6% current smokers) were analyzed, 268 (21.5%) did not fulfill spirometric diagnostic criteria for COPD. Data of 748 patients (63% males, 44.1% current smokers) were available for model analysis. In order to predict exacerbation an extended Cox Model was performed. Mean FEV1/FVC-ratio was 53.1% (±11.5), with a majority of patients in COPD GOLD classes 2 or 3. Hospitalization for any reason (HR1.7; P = 0.04) and pronounced dyspnea (HR for mMRC grade four 3.0; P < 0.001) at most recent visit as well as prescription of short-acting bronchodilators (HR1.7; P < 0.001), inhaled (HR1.2; P = 0.005) or systemic corticosteroids (HR1.8; P = 0.015) were significantly associated with exacerbation when having had no exacerbation at most recent visit. Higher FEV1/FVC (HR0.9; P = 0.008) and higher FEV1 values (HR0.9; P = 0.001) were protective. When already having had an exacerbation at the most recent visit, pronounced dyspnea (HR for mMRC grade 4 1.9; P = 0.026) and cerebrovascular insult (HR2.1; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with re-exacerbation. Physical activity (HR0.6; P = 0.031) and treatment with long-acting anticholinergics (HR0.7; P = 0.044) seemed to play a significant protective role. In a best subset model for exacerbation, higher FEV1 significantly reduced and occurrence of sputum increased the probability of exacerbation. In the same model for re-exacerbation, coronary heart disease increased and hospitalization at most recent visit seemed to reduce the risk for re-exacerbation. Our data confirmed well-established risk factors for exacerbations whilst analyzing their predictive association with exacerbation and re-exacerbation. This study confirmed the importance of spirometry in primary care, not only for diagnosis but also as a risk evaluation for possible future exacerbations. Our study got approval by local ethical committee in 2006 (EK Nr. 170/06) and was registered retrospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02065921 , 19th of February 2014).

(1) Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its associated morbidity and mortality are a global burden on both affected patients and healthcare systems. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) issues guidelines with the aim of improving COPD management. Previous studies reported significant variability in adherence to these recommendations. The objective of this study was to evaluate Swiss primary practitioners’ adherence to the GOLD guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. (2) Methods: We studied patients who were included in the Swiss COPD cohort study, an ongoing prospective study in a primary care setting, between 2015 and 2022. The key inclusion criteria are age ≥ 40 years, FEV1/FVC ratio < 70%, and a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years. Adherence to the GOLD guidelines was assessed per visit and over time. (3) Results: The data of 225 COPD patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years, 64% male) and their respective 1163 visits were analyzed. In 65% of visits (726/1121), treatment was prescribed according to the GOLD guidelines. Non-adherence was most common in GOLD groups A and B (64% and 33%) and mainly consisted of over-treatment (two long-acting bronchodilators in group A (98/195, 50%) and ICS in groups A (21/195, 11%) and B (198/808, 25%)). In group D, the prescriptions conformed with the guidelines in 99% of cases (109/108). Guideline adherence was associated with high symptom load (COPD Assessment Test) (OR 1.04, p = 0.002), high number of exacerbations (OR = 2.07, p < 0.001), asthma overlap (OR 3.36, p = 0.049), and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.82, p = 0.045). (4) Conclusion: These results confirm a conflict between the GOLD recommendations and primary practice, mainly concerning over-treatment in GOLD groups A and B. Patients with high symptom load, high exacerbation risk, asthma overlap, and diabetes mellitus are more likely to be treated in conformity with the guidelines. Further research is needed to uncover the reasons for the discrepancies and to design strategies for improvement.

Purpose: Although studies have evaluated benralizumab, a monoclonal IL-5 receptor α antibody in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), in real-world settings, additional evidence is needed to further characterize its effectiveness in specific patient populations. Our study aimed to evaluate asthma control over 56 weeks in patients treated with benralizumab in Swiss real-world settings. Patients and Methods: Conducted across 13 centres, this prospective, observational, non-interventional study involved 73 adults with physician confirmed SEA. Benralizumab 30 mg was administered according to the Swiss label at baseline and up to week 56. Primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores at week 8 compared to baseline. Exacerbations, use of oral corticosteroids (OCS), and lung function were assessed descriptively. Results: At baseline, the mean ACQ-5 score was 2.76 (SD 1.26), with 82.2% of patients showing not well-controlled asthma (ACQ-5 > 1.5). At week 8, the mean change in ACQ-5 compared to baseline was − 0.95 (95% CI: − 1.25, − 0.66; p < 0.001). More than half of patients (59.1%) reached a clinically relevant improvement (MCID ≥ 0.5) at week 8, with 40.9% of patients doing so at week 1 and 87.2% at week 56. The annualized exacerbation rate (AER) of 3.65 (95% CI: 3.18, 4.18) at baseline was reduced to 0.68 (95% CI: 0.39, 1.19) at week 56. The relative reduction in AER from baseline to week 56 was 81.3%. Maintenance usage of OCS at baseline (median 25.0 mg/day) decreased over the study leading to a median change of 17.50 mg/day (95% CI: 10.0; 40.0) from baseline compared to week 56. The mean pre-bronchodilator FEV1 change from baseline to week 56 was 0.23 L (95% CI: 0.08; 0.38, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Benralizumab demonstrated significant, rapid improvements in asthma control within one week of treatment initiation, with sustained benefits over 56 weeks.

Patients with severe asthma (SA) experience significant morbidity, due to high exacerbation rates and frequent use of oral corticosteroids (OCS). In randomized trials, biologic therapies (biologics) consistently improve SA outcomes. Using pharmacy claims data, the AUBOCIAS study estimated OCS use before and after initiation of biologics, and yearly trend of biologics use among SA patients. Anonymized dispensation data from pharmacies (IQVIA Switzerland LRx network) were retrieved between 2018 and 2023. SA patients aged ≥12 were identified by regular use of fixed-dose combinations over ≥12 months, or OCS, or any biologics used for SA. Main outcome was the change in total annual dose (TAD) of OCS after initiation of biologics. In 2023, among a total of 26,146 patients with likely asthma, 3882 (10.6 %) were identified as having SA. The mean age was 61 years and 57.0 % were females. Of those 63.0 % were using OCS, with a mean TAD of 1760 mg. Initiations of biologics for SA increased from 0.4 % (2018) to 14.3 % (2023). Over the study period, among 532 biologics initiators, 282 (53.0 %) used OCS: 87 patients (36.0 %) could be weaned (p < 0.0001). Among persistent OCS users, the mean TAD decreased from 1200-375 mg (-68.8 %; p < 0.0001). In Switzerland, 10.6 % of patients with likely asthma identified in the LRx database were considered to have SA. OCS were frequently used at high TAD, while biologics were increasingly initiated. Most biologics initiators were able to reduce or discontinue OCS.