Alexander Michaelis

Prof. Alexander Michaelis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 September 2021 in Advanced Functional Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHChristian Heubner
Christian Heubner
SMSebastian Maletti
Sebastian Maletti
HAHenry Auer
Henry Auer
JHJuliane Hüttl
Juliane Hüttl
KVKarsten Voigt
Karsten Voigt
Alexander MichaelisAlexander Michaelis
Alexander Michaelis
The development of rechargeable batteries with high‐energy density is critical for future decarbonization of transportation. Anode‐free Li‐ion batteries, using a bare current collector at the anode side without any excess of Li, provide the highest volumetric energy density (>1500 Wh L−1) among all possible cell configurations. Furthermore, elimination of the anode material coating reduces material consumption and greatly simplifies cell production, which in turn lowers costs. Although significant progress has been made recently by the application of modified current collectors, optimized cycling parameters and improved liquid electrolytes, insufficient efficiencies, and dendritic growth during lithium plating lead to poor cycle life of typically less than 100 cycles as well as safety issues. Alternatively, very recent studies have demonstrated anode‐free solid‐state batteries that combine the benefits of high energy anode‐free cell configuration and solid‐state systems with high safety, exceeding 1000 cycles. This review provides an overview of recent developments toward anode‐free solid‐state batteries and highlights the current issues and challenges in this nascent field. It is concluded that, although major challenges remain at the present, the lessons learned in the fields of liquid electrolytes and solid‐state lithium metal batteries can accelerate the development of anode‐free solid‐state batteries of practical relevance.

1 January 2017 in Energy Storage Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TJTony Jaumann
Tony Jaumann
JBJuan Balach
Juan Balach
ULUlrike Langklotz
Ulrike Langklotz
VSViktar Sauchuk
Viktar Sauchuk
MFMarco Fritsch
Marco Fritsch
LGLars Giebeler
Lars Giebeler
Fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and vinylene carbonate (VC) are the most frequently used electrolyte additives to enhance the lifetime of anode materials in Li-ion batteries, but for silicon it is still ambiguous when FEC or VC is more beneficial. Herein, a low-cost nanostructured silicon/carbon anode derived from HSiCl3 is tailored by the rational choice of the additive, to obtain an anode material outperforming current complex silicon structures. We demonstrate highly reversible areal capacities of up to 5 mAh/cm2 at 4.4 mg/cm2 mass loading, a specific capacity of 1280 mAh/gAnode, a capacity retention of 81 % after 500 deep-discharge cycles versus lithium metal and successful full-cell tests with high-voltage cathodes meeting the requirements for real application. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and post-mortem investigation provide new insights in tailoring the interfacial properties of silicon-based anodes for high performance anode materials based on an alloying mechanism with large volume changes. The role of fluorine in the FEC-derived interfacial layer is discussed in comparison with the VC-derived layer and possible degradation mechanisms are proposed. We believe that this study gives a valuable understanding and provides new strategies on the facile use of additives for highly reversible silicon anodes in Li-ion batteries

1 April 2019 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChristian Heubner
Christian Heubner
ANA. Nickol
A. Nickol
JSJ. Seeba
J. Seeba
SRS. Reuber
S. Reuber
NJN. Junker
N. Junker
Alexander MichaelisAlexander Michaelis
Alexander Michaelis

25 November 2019 in Advanced Energy Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHChristian Heubner
Christian Heubner
Michael SchneiderMichael Schneider
Michael Schneider
Alexander MichaelisAlexander Michaelis
Alexander Michaelis
The critical challenge for the user acceptance of electric vehicles is the simultaneous improvement of the driving range and fast charging capabilities, which are related to the energy and power density of the storage device. Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) are currently the most promising candidate to push electric vehicles toward the mass market. However, they suffer from a tradeoff between energy and power density, forbidding arbitrary combinations of high storage capacity and fast charging capability. Herein, a simple electrochemical principle describing the intrinsic limits of LIBs is reported. It is deduced that the tradeoff between energy and power density originates from diffusion limitations in the electrolyte. The electrochemical approach of diffusion‐limited current density is adapted to porous Li‐ion insertion electrodes, resulting in the “diffusion‐limited C‐rate” (DLC). The theoretical considerations are in excellent agreement with experimentally observed rate limitations of a large number of electrodes with different active materials and varying design parameters. While the C‐rate drawn from an LIB cannot be higher than the DLC without significant capacity decline, parameter variations that improve the DLC reduce the nominal specific capacity. This relationship makes the DLC a fundamental quantity revealing the most expedient optimization approaches and promising directions for future battery research and development.

27 August 2015 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TJTony Jaumann
Tony Jaumann
JBJuan Balach
Juan Balach
MKMarkus Klose
Markus Klose
SOSteffen Oswald
Steffen Oswald
ULUlrike Langklotz
Ulrike Langklotz
LGLars Giebeler
Lars Giebeler
Silicon is a promising negative electrode for secondary lithium-based batteries, but the electrochemical reversibility of particularly nanostructured silicon electrodes drastically depends on their interfacial characteristics, commonly known as the solid electrolyte interface (SEI). The beneficial origin of certain electrolyte additives or different binders is still discussed controversially owing to the challenging peculiarities of interfacial post-mortem investigations of electrodes. In this work, we address the common difficulties of SEI investigations of porous silicon/carbon nanostructures and study the addition of a fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) as a stabilizing additive as well as the use of two different binders, carboxymethyl cellulose/styrene-butadiene rubber (CMC/SBR) and polyacrylic acid (PAA), for the SEI formation. The electrode is composed of silicon nanocrystallites below 5 nm diameter allowing a detailed investigation of interfacial characteristics of silicon owing to the high surface area. We first performed galvanostatic long-term cycling (400 times) and carried out comprehensive ex situ characterization of the cycled nanocrystalline silicon electrodes with XRD, EDXS, TEM and XPS. We modified the preparation of the electrode for post-mortem characterization to distinguish between electrolyte components and the actual SEI. The impact of the FEC additive and two different binders on the interfacial layer is studied and the occurrence of diverse compounds, in particular LiF, Li2O and phosphates, is discussed. These results help to understand general issues in SEI formation and to pave the way for the development of advanced electrolytes allowing for a long-term performance of nanostructured Si-based electrodes.

1 August 2017 in Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
USUwe Scheithauer
Uwe Scheithauer
ESEric Schwarzer
Eric Schwarzer
TMTassilo Moritz
Tassilo Moritz
Alexander MichaelisAlexander Michaelis
Alexander Michaelis