Giampaolo Barone

Prof. Giampaolo Barone

Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 17, 90128 Palermo, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 March 2014 in European Journal of Organic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAntonino Lauria
Antonino Lauria
RDRiccardo Delisi
Riccardo Delisi
FMFrancesco Mingoia
Francesco Mingoia
ATAlessio Terenzi
Alessio Terenzi
AMAnnamaria Martorana
Annamaria Martorana
AAAnna Maria Almerico
Anna Maria Almerico

1 October 2013 in Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGiampaolo Barone
Giampaolo Barone
ATAlessio Terenzi
Alessio Terenzi
ALAntonino Lauria
Antonino Lauria
AAAnna Maria Almerico
Anna Maria Almerico
JLJosé M. Leal
José M. Leal
BGBegoña García
Begoña García

22 March 2019 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria Valeria RaimondiMaria Valeria Raimondi
Maria Valeria Raimondi
OROrnella Randazzo
Ornella Randazzo
MFMery La Franca
Mery La Franca
GBGiampaolo Barone
Giampaolo Barone
EVElisa Vignoni
Elisa Vignoni
Simona CollinaSimona Collina
Simona Collina
Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors are an important class of drugs, as evidenced by their use as antibacterial, antimalarial, antifungal, and anticancer agents. Progress in understanding the biochemical basis of mechanisms responsible for enzyme selectivity and antiproliferative effects has renewed the interest in antifolates for cancer chemotherapy and prompted the medicinal chemistry community to develop novel and selective human DHFR inhibitors, thus leading to a new generation of DHFR inhibitors. This work summarizes the mechanism of action, chemical, and anticancer profile of the DHFR inhibitors discovered in the last six years. New strategies in DHFR drug discovery are also provided, in order to thoroughly delineate the current landscape for medicinal chemists interested in furthering this study in the anticancer field.

1 April 2004 in Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASArturo Silvestri
Arturo Silvestri
GBGiampaolo Barone
Giampaolo Barone
GRGiuseppe Ruisi
Giuseppe Ruisi
MGMaria Teresa Lo Giudice
Maria Teresa Lo Giudice
STSalvatore Tumminello
Salvatore Tumminello

1 May 2007 in Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASArturo Silvestri
Arturo Silvestri
GBGiampaolo Barone
Giampaolo Barone
GRGiuseppe Ruisi
Giuseppe Ruisi
DADaniele Anselmo
Daniele Anselmo
Serena RielaSerena Riela
Serena Riela
VLVincenzo Turco Liveri
Vincenzo Turco Liveri

16 July 2014 in RSC Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ATAlessio Terenzi
Alessio Terenzi
RBRiccardo Bonsignore
Riccardo Bonsignore
ASAngelo Spinello
Angelo Spinello
Carla GentileCarla Gentile
Carla Gentile
AMAnnamaria Martorana
Annamaria Martorana
GBGiampaolo Barone
Giampaolo Barone
The affinity of three square-planar nickel(II) (1), copper(II) (2) and zinc(II) (3) Schiff-base complexes for wild-type human telomeric (h-Telo) and protooncogene c-myc G-quadruplex (G4) DNA was investigated by UV-visible absorption spectroscopy and circular dichroism. DNA-binding constants (Kb) were determined by spectrophotometric titrations for both G4-DNA and B-DNA. The results obtained point out that the three metal complexes selectively bind G4-DNA with higher affinity, up to two orders of magnitude, with respect to B-DNA. The nickel(II) complex 1 was found to be the most effective G4-DNA stabilizer and the Kb values decrease in the order 1 > 2 ≈ 3. Innovative computational investigations, consisting of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations followed by density functional theory/molecular mechanics (DFT/MM) calculations, provide atomistic support for the interpretation of the binding mechanism to G4-DNA by end stacking and also of the experimental affinity order. Interestingly, 1 is able to induce G4-DNA formation of h-Telo sequences, also in the absence of K+ cations. This last result is nicely confirmed and highlighted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stop assays, which show the ability of the title compounds to induce and stabilize G4 structures inhibiting the amplification of PCR products. Finally, compounds 1–3 showed concentration and time-dependent cytotoxicity towards HeLa and MCF-7 human cancer cell lines, inducing significant effects on cell cycle distribution with G2/M arrest in HeLa cells and G0/G1 arrest in MCF-7 cells. Overall, the PCR inhibition and anticancer activity of the three compounds decreases in the same order 1 > 2 ≈ 3, in excellent correlation with the G4-DNA-binding affinity, implying that G4-DNA is the biotarget for their biological activity.