Emanuele Lingua

Prof. Emanuele Lingua

Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padova Viale dell’Università 16, 35020, Legnaro(PD), Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 November 2013 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LCLohengrin A. Cavieres
Lohengrin A. Cavieres
RBRob W Brooker
Rob W Brooker
BBBradley J Butterfield
Bradley J Butterfield
BCBradley J Cook
Bradley J Cook
ZKZaal Kikvidze
Zaal Kikvidze
RCRagan M Callaway
Ragan M Callaway

15 May 2015 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LELothar Eysn
Lothar Eysn
MHMarkus Hollaus
Markus Hollaus
ELEva Lindberg
Eva Lindberg
FBFrédéric Berger
Frédéric Berger
JMJean-Matthieu Monnet
Jean-Matthieu Monnet
Norbert PfeiferNorbert Pfeifer
Norbert Pfeifer
In this study, eight airborne laser scanning (ALS)-based single tree detection methods are benchmarked and investigated. The methods were applied to a unique dataset originating from different regions of the Alpine Space covering different study areas, forest types, and structures. This is the first benchmark ever performed for different forests within the Alps. The evaluation of the detection results was carried out in a reproducible way by automatically matching them to precise in situ forest inventory data using a restricted nearest neighbor detection approach. Quantitative statistical parameters such as percentages of correctly matched trees and omission and commission errors are presented. The proposed automated matching procedure presented herein shows an overall accuracy of 97%. Method based analysis, investigations per forest type, and an overall benchmark performance are presented. The best matching rate was obtained for single-layered coniferous forests. Dominated trees were challenging for all methods. The overall performance shows a matching rate of 47%, which is comparable to results of other benchmarks performed in the past. The study provides new insight regarding the potential and limits of tree detection with ALS and underlines some key aspects regarding the choice of method when performing single tree detection for the various forest types encountered in alpine regions.

1 March 2007 in Rangeland Ecology & Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWPeter J. Weisberg
Peter J. Weisberg
ELEmanuele Lingua
Emanuele Lingua
RPRekha B. Pillai
Rekha B. Pillai

1 November 2006 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRenzo Motta
Renzo Motta
RBRoberta Berretti
Roberta Berretti
ELEmanuele Lingua
Emanuele Lingua
PPPietro Piussi
Pietro Piussi

1 February 2021 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlexandro B. Leverkus
Alexandro B. Leverkus
BBBrian Buma
Brian Buma
JWJoseph Wagenbrenner
Joseph Wagenbrenner
PBPhilip J. Burton
Philip J. Burton
ELEmanuele Lingua
Emanuele Lingua
STSimon Thorn
Simon Thorn

1 September 2018 in Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlexandro B. Leverkus
Alexandro B. Leverkus
JBJosé María Rey Benayas
José María Rey Benayas
JCJorge Castro
Jorge Castro
DBDominique Boucher
Dominique Boucher
SBStephen Brewer
Stephen Brewer
LGLena Gustafsson
Lena Gustafsson
Wildfires, insect outbreaks, and windstorms are increasingly common forest disturbances. Post-disturbance management often involves salvage logging, i.e., the felling and removal of the affected trees; however, this practice may represent an additional disturbance with effects on ecosystem processes and services. We developed a systematic map to provide an overview of the primary studies on this topic and created a database with information on the characteristics of the retrieved publications, including information on stands, disturbance, intervention, measured outcomes, and study design. Of 4341 retrieved publications, 90 were retained in the systematic map. These publications represented 49 studies, predominantly from North America and Europe. Salvage logging after wildfire was addressed more frequently than after insect outbreaks or windstorms. Most studies addressed logging after a single disturbance event, and replication of salvaged stands rarely exceeded 10. The most frequent response variables were tree regeneration, ground cover, and deadwood characteristics. This document aims to help managers find the most relevant primary studies on the ecological effects of salvage logging. It also aims to identify and discuss clusters and gaps in the body of evidence, relevant for scientists who aim to synthesize previous work or identify questions for future studies.