Background: The relationship between allergic status, SARS-CoV-2 infection, Long COVID, and post-restriction respiratory outcomes in children remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to explore the associations between allergic status and Long COVID, as well as between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and post-restriction changes in allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma, and upper respiratory infections, in a pediatric tertiary-care cohort. Methods: We conducted a single-center, questionnaire-based observational study involving children aged 0–16 years, who were followed at the Pediatric Allergy Clinic of Umberto I Hospital in Rome. Parents completed an email-based questionnaire addressing SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination, persistent post-infectious symptoms, allergic diseases, and respiratory infections following restrictions. Analyses of Long COVID were limited to children with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: A total of 214 questionnaires were analyzed. Allergic status was not significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the overall cohort. Among infected children, allergic status was independently associated with higher odds of Long COVID (adjusted OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.20–8.09; p = 0.019). Severe acute infection was also strongly associated with Long COVID (adjusted OR 6.84, 95% CI 2.72–17.21; p < 0.001). Complete vaccination was associated with lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the overall sample (adjusted OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.46; p < 0.001) but was not independently associated with Long COVID among infected children. After the removal of COVID-19 restrictions, 90.1% of allergic children reported worsening AR and 52.0% reported worsening asthma, with no significant association with SARS-CoV-2 infection or Long COVID. Group A Streptocossus (GAS) pharyngitis was reported in 50.0% and viral pharyngitis in 10.7% of the cohort, with no significant differences between allergic and non-allergic children. Conclusions: In this single-center, questionnaire-based pediatric cohort, allergic status was correlated with increased likelihood of Long COVID among children with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, it was not associated with a higher risk of infection itself. Complete vaccination was linked to a reduced risk of infection, whereas no independent correlation with Long COVID was identified. Post-restriction exacerbation of allergic respiratory symptoms was prevalent, while the incidence of bacterial and viral pharyngitis did not vary significantly according to allergic status.

We present a pediatric case of the antiplatelet effect of melatonin taken through breast milk in an 18-month-old child. The child was referred to our hematology outpatient clinic because of bleeding episodes that she presented since birth. Blood tests excluded the presence of blood coagulation diseases. The family history was negative for bleeding disorders. The child did not consume any drugs, food supplements, herbal teas or infusions. We performed an aggregation platelet test, which showed a reduced platelet aggregation. Shortly before, the baby had been breastfed. We speculated that breast milk could interfere with the result of the test; therefore, we decided to repeat the test in a fasting state. This time the test showed a normal platelet aggregation time. We learned that the child’s mother was taking a mixture of valerian and melatonin. Thus, we decided to suspend maternal intake of melatonin and perform a new platelet aggregation test after three months. The test results were negative. After the suspension of melatonin, the patient did not present further bleeding events. In this case, melatonin, through the inhibition of platelet aggregation, had an important role on the hemostatic system of the child. Melatonin is considered as a dietary supplement and is mostly available as an alternative medicine without formal prescription and dosage regulation. It is important, especially during breastfeeding, to investigate personal and medication history, including also homeopathic remedies or dietary supplements.

Background: Almond is one of the most widely consumed tree nuts worldwide; however, almond allergy remains poorly characterized. Despite frequent sensitization, the prevalence of clinically relevant almond allergy appears low, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. This review summarizes current evidence on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic challenges of almond allergy. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and UpToDate databases. Studies reporting almond-specific data on epidemiology, diagnostics, molecular allergens, and oral food challenge (OFC) outcomes were included. Results: Across heterogeneous studies, clinically confirmed almond allergy appears to be uncommon despite high rates of sensitization, particularly among patients with atopic dermatitis and concomitant tree nut allergy. In sensitized individuals, OFC positivity ranges from 4% to 33%, with anaphylaxis and severe reactions reported in 0.5–12.2% of challenged patients. Conventional diagnostic tests, including skin prick testing and almond-specific IgE, demonstrate limited predictive value, with no reliable cut-off levels for predicting clinical reactivity. Consequently, OFC remains essential for definitive diagnosis. Clinical outcomes vary according to age, ethnicity, and almond processing, with lower OFC positivity observed in pediatric cohorts and reduced reactivity to processed almond products. Conclusions: Almond allergy is relatively rare despite frequent sensitization. Improved almond-specific molecular diagnostics may enhance risk stratification and reduce unnecessary dietary avoidance.