Background: Falls are a major concern for people of all ages, especially older adults with declining physical functions and deteriorating muscle strength. The Five Times Sit to Stand Test is used for the assessment of lower limb strength along with balance and postural control. Therefore, the systematic review at hand aimed to determine the optimal procedure and characteristics among older adults. Methods: The following databases served as the primary sources through which the target studies were searched for and obtained for review. They included Google Scholar, Pedro, BIOMED Central, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PUBMED and Science DIRECT. With the aim of fulfilling the eligibility criteria, 16 full-text studies were included and the quality assessment was performed. using the Thomas Tool. Results: The total number of the subjects who participated in the included studies was 15,130 and the ages of the aforementioned participants ranged from 60 to 80 years. In 15 of the studies, a stopwatch was used as the scoring method where the mean chair height of 42 cm was reported. Two studies reported that no significant influence of the arm position (P = .096) on the time allocated for test completion was identified. However, posterior foot placement (P < .001) led to shorter times of completion. Individuals who are unable to complete the test are more susceptible to activities of daily living related disabilities (P < .01) when compared to fall risk (P = .09). Conclusion: The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test is a safe test, providing added value to apply risk for falls in people at moderate risk and in healthy populations using standardized chair heights and stopwatches.

Family-centered care is widely considered as best practice in pediatric rehabilitation. We aimed to investigate parents’ perception of the family-centeredness of health care services for their children with cerebral palsy (CP) using the Arabic Measure of Processes of Care-20 (AR-MPOC-20). We also explored factors related to the child (sex, secondary impairments, and gross motor classification system level) and environment (family and residential region) that may influence the family-centeredness of services in Saudi Arabia. This was a cross-sectional study of 223 children with CP (age 6 months–18.2 years, M = 6.2 + 3.7 years) and their parents. Generally, parents perceived services as less family-centered. The lowest average score was for ‘Providing General Information’ (M = 2.9 ± 1.5), while ‘Respectful and Supportive Care’ had the highest average (M = 4.6 ± 1.8). Factors influencing the provision of family-centered care included being a female child and a mother’s educational level. In addition, all subscales of AR-MPOC-20 differed by region, p < 0.001, except for ‘Providing Specific Information’ which did not significantly differ by region p = 0.163. Clinicians should consider the families’ need for information regarding their children’s condition and available services, with special attention to the mothers of female children and mothers with low levels of education.

Individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) have limited mobility and are unable to actively participate in tasks that are part of their daily living. Thus, continuous therapeutic sessions are required to keep such individuals active and engaged in the environment. Due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) lockdowns, rehabilitation for children with CP was inhibited which consequently put them at risk of losing their functional gains which were obtained through previous in-person therapies. In order to avoid this, an alternate to conventional therapy was required and this rendered it necessary to review the role of telerehabilitation (TR) and its various modes for the rehabilitation of children with CP. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of TR for children with CP during COVID-19 through the present literature and to determine if TR is an alternate to conventional physical therapy in children with CP during the coronavirus outbreak. This scoping review was conducted by searching different databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, Medline, and Google Scholar on the basis of inclusion criteria. Screening was performed from January 2019 to June 2022 and the initial screening attempt returned 469 studies. After applying the aforementioned criteria, all impertinent studies were excluded which resulted in 28 studies being included for this review as they contained information about the effectiveness of TR on children with CP during COVID-19. These 28 articles included randomised controlled trials, surveys, reviews, clinical trials, case reports, prospective studies, editorials, and longitudinal studies. Three out of the 7 randomised controlled trial studies revealed that action observation treatment can be a useful approach for TR in child with CP during similar pandemics. The other 3 studies supported the use of computer-based games, robots, nonimmersive virtual reality, and wearable haptic devices as a significant means of TR in child with CP as an alternate to routine therapy during COVID-19. TR is an affable mode of rehabilitation specifically for the pediatric population. In the future, it can be an alternate to routine therapy for those who are unlikely to get daily access to in-person therapeutic sessions due to various reasons or circumstances.

A simple, valid, and reliable self-assessment fall-risk questionnaire in Arabic is needed to significantly promote awareness and develop fall-prevention programs. This study translated and adapted the Fall Risk Questionnaire (FRQ) into Arabic and determined its validity and reliability among Saudi Arabian older adults in two phases: (1) cross-culturally adapting the FRQ into Arabic and (2) assessing the adapted questionnaire’s psychometric properties in two sessions with 110 Arabic-speaking participants aged ≥65 years. Pearson’s r showed that the Arabic FRQ had a significant moderate negative relationship with the Berg Balance Scale and fair-to-moderate positive correlations with Five Time Sit to Stand and Time Up and Go. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a significant area under the curve = 0.81. The cut-off score was 7.5 and associated with 73.7% sensitivity and 73.6% specificity. Internal consistency was estimated as good, with Cronbach’s α = 0.77. Deletion of item 1 slightly increased Cronbach’s α to 0.78. The Arabic FRQ demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92–0.97). It is highly valid and reliable in providing valuable data for evaluating fall risk in adults aged ≥65 years and for consulting a specialist for further investigation if necessary.

Background: Motion sensitivity, or motion sickness, is common in modern vehicular and visually stimulating environments. Several studies have shown a relationship between motion sensitivity and decreased postural stability. We aimed to evaluate the effects of head motion (horizontal and vertical) on postural stability in healthy adults with and without chronic motion sensitivity (CMS).Methods: Sixty healthy adult men and women (age, 20–40 years) with CMS (CMS group,n = 30) and without CMS (non-CMS group,n = 30) participated in the study. Postural stability was assessed during three conditions (static, horizontal head motion, and vertical head motion) using computerized dynamic posturography. Group and condition-related differences in equilibrium scores were evaluated.Results: There was no significant group x condition interaction (F_2,114 = 0.9, partial ƞ² = 0.04,p = 0.35). However, significant condition-related differences in equilibrium scores were observed (F_2,114 = 26.4, partial ƞ² = 0.31,p < 0.001). Equilibrium scores were significantly worse in the horizontal and vertical head motion conditions compared to those in the static condition (p < 0.001), but were comparable in vertical and horizontal head motion conditions (p = 0.27).Conclusions: Postural stability was lower in the horizontal and vertical conditions compared to the static condition. However, horizontal and vertical head motions had comparable effects on postural stability in both CMS and non-CMS groups, contrary to our expectations.

Background/Objectives: Physical therapists’ use of various balance assessment tools is essential for accurately identifying deficits and guiding rehabilitation plans. This study aimed to investigate clinical balance assessment practices in Saudi Arabia, examine physical therapists’ preferences for different balance assessment tools, and analyze how participant characteristics—such as age, experience, and practice setting—affect these preferences. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between April and July 2024 in Saudi Arabia. A total of 194 physical therapists (62.9% male; 45.9% with 1–5 years of experience) who actively manage individuals with balance disorders were recruited using a convenience sampling technique. Data were collected through a self-structured questionnaire. Participants reported their use of balance assessment tools on a six-point Likert scale, incorporating both numeric and descriptive anchors. Results: The Single-Leg Stance was the most regularly used tool (54.6%), followed by the Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) (both 43.8%). Conversely, tools such as the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (68.1%), Mini Balance Evaluation System (65.4%), and Fall Efficacy Scale International (56.2%) were the most underutilized. Significant associations were observed between tool preferences and participant characteristics, including area of practice, academic qualification, experience level, and work environment (p < 0.05). However, several validated assessment tools remain underutilized, highlighting gaps in awareness and training. Conclusions: The findings of this study highlight the need for greater standardization in balance assessment practices. Improving training programs, establishing clear clinical guidelines, and standardizing assessment protocols across healthcare settings can help make balance evaluations more consistent and effective.