Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Its incidence is rising faster than any other cancer in the United States and it remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. While advances in massive parallel sequencing and integration of ‘omics information have transformed the field of oncology, tissue access is often limited in HCC and a single biopsy is poorly representative of the known genetic heterogeneity of tumours. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising strategy for analysing circulating tumour components including circulating tumour DNA. Cell-free DNA and tumour DNA are derived from necrotic, apoptotic and living eukaryotic cells. The profiling of genetic and epigenetic alterations in circulating cell-free DNA has potential clinical applications including early disease detection, prediction of treatment response and prognostication in real time. Novel biomarker candidates for disease detection and monitoring are under study. Of these, methylation analyses of circulating tumour DNA have shown promising performance for early HCC detection in at-risk patients. Assessments of assay performance in longitudinal validation cohorts are ongoing. Implementation of liquid biopsy for HCC will likely improve upon the current surveillance strategy. This review summarises the most recent developments on the role and utility of circulating cell-free DNA in the detection and management of HCC.

Purpose: Clinical-pathologic features and natural history of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH)-mutant intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are not well characterized. Here, we sought to describe the natural history, clinical phenotype, and prognostic impact of advanced, IDH-mutated CCA. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric, retrospective analysis of patients with IDH-mutated (IDH1 or IDH2) CCA between 2010 and 2020. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Chi-square test was used to analyze disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate (ORR). Matched controls were used for comparing survival between patients with and without IDH mutations (mIDH). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with IDH-mutated CCA were included. All patients had intrahepatic CCA. On first-line chemotherapy, median OS and median PFS were 21.2 months and 8.3 months, respectively. Notably, median OS (32.4 v 19.5 months, P = .12) and PFS (18.0 v 8.0 months, P = .12) were not significantly affected by disease status at presentation (locally advanced v metastatic, respectively). Median OS was significantly longer in patients with mIDH (21.2 v 10.5 months; P < .01). First-line gemcitabine-containing regimens had a significantly higher DCR and ORR than non–gemcitabine-containing regimens (DCR: 75% v 33%, P = .01; ORR: 39% v 0%, P = .02). In patients receiving IDH inhibitor therapy, median PFS was 4.6 months with a DCR of 29%. CONCLUSION: CCA with m IDH confers a unique subtype resulting in a better survival compared with that of counterparts. IDH inhibitors represent a promising therapeutic option in later lines of therapy in this subgroup.

(1) Background: Cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following progression on sorafenib. Recently, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been approved in the first line setting for advanced HCC and has become the new standard of care. Whether cabozantinib improves outcomes following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown. We describe the clinical outcomes following treatment with immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC who received cabozantinib. (2) Methods: We conducted a multicentric, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010–2021 at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida who received cabozantinib. Median overall survival and progression free survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events were determined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (3). Results: We identified 26 patients with advanced HCC who received cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. Median progression free survival on cabozantinib therapy was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.3–3.9) and median overall survival from time of cabozantinib initiation was 7.7 months (95% CI: 5.3–14.9). (4) Conclusion: The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown. Our study demonstrates that patients may benefit from treatment with cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (a + b) has improved the prognosis of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the outcome for individual patients is highly variable. This study aimed to (i) develop and validate a prognostic prediction model to estimate individual prognosis and (ii) compare it with established models. In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with HCC undergoing first-line immunotherapy with a + b from 24 centers (Europe, USA) were included. Statistical analysis and reporting followed the TRIPOD guidelines. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). A Cox model was developed and externally validated. In total, 683 patients were included (training: 526, validation: 157). The C-reactive protein, albumin, bilirubin, lymphocytes, ECOG performance status, and extrahepatic spread (CABLE score) remained significantly associated with OS in Cox regression analysis. In the training set, the CABLE score had a higher discriminatory accuracy relative to ALBI, EZ-ALBI, mALBI, CRAFITY, PNI, NLR, PLR, and GPS (time-dependent AUC 0.79 and C-index 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.78) at 12 months). In the external validation set, the discriminatory performance of the CABLE score was comparable to ALBI, EZ-ALBI, and mALBI, but on average higher than PNI, CRAFITY, NLR, PLR, and GPS. In patients with Child-Pugh A, the CABLE score outperformed ALBI, EZ-ALBI, and mALBI in the first 9 months. We provide a web-based calculator for the CABLE score to allow estimation of individual prognosis for these patients (http://shiny.imbei.uni-mainz.de:3838/CABLE_Score/). The CABLE score shows good discriminatory performance in assessing the individual prognosis of patients undergoing first-line immunotherapy with a + b. Further validation studies are needed to investigate its performance compared with the ALBI score, in particular in subgroup analysis. The CABLE score allows estimation of the prognosis of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing first-line immunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab at an individual level using our web-based calculator. This feature, as well as the evaluation of the score’s added benefit through an extensive comparison with other established scores, can inform clinicians on their significance and may guide clinical decision-making in the context of a malignant disease where the prognosis has become highly variable. Further large validation studies are needed to investigate the incremental value of the CABLE score compared with the ALBI score, in particular in subgroups such as patients designated as Child-Pugh A.