3D printing technology has brought about a paradigm shift in the delivery of clinical care in medicine and dentistry. There are several different 3D printing technologies, which, along with different printable materials with unique biomechanical properties, allows for a wide range of applications for 3D printing in dentistry. The clinical use of 3D printing has created versatile applications which streamline our digital workflow. Technological advancements have also paved the way for the integration of new dental materials in dentistry. This paper provides an overview of the mechanisms of 3D printing, the dental materials relevant to each mechanism and the possible applications of these materials within different areas of dentistry. Understanding the existing spectrum of 3D printing applications in dentistry will serve to further expand its use in the dental field.

The adaptation and marginal integrity of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) crowns after exposure to thermal aging need to be investigated. The present in-vitro study was designed to investigate the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM fabricated crowns cemented on extracted teeth after thermocycling aging. Twenty-six newly extracted human premolars were prepared for full-coverage CAD/CAM crowns and were divided into two groups (leucite-reinforced glass-ceramics and lithium disilicate glass-ceramics). Both crowns’ groups were cemented using dual curing resin cement. All specimen margins were measured for marginal integrity using an imaging system 24 h post cementation; then after 1, 3, and 5 estimated clinical years (10,000, 30,000, and 50,000 thermocycles). Two-way ANOVA analysis were used to determine whether the mean value difference is significantly different (ɑ = 0.05). The average margin gaps recorded for leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns were: 82.61 μm initial, and 91.02 μm after 5 estimated clinical year). For the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crowns, the average margin gaps recorded were: 100.01 μm initial, and 120.21 μm after 5 estimated clinical year. During all measuring intervals, the leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crown group had a lower marginal discrepancy. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was recorded. After being subjected to thermocycling, both CAD/CAM ceramic crowns, exhibited an increase in their marginal discrepancy; the difference was within the accepted clinical range.