In this retrospective study, we evaluated the levels of a series of serum biomarkers in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patients (mild: 131; severe: 98; critical: 23). We found that there were significant increases in levels of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) (73.6 ± 38.3 vs 46.5 ± 14.7 pmol/L; P < .001), cytokeratin‐19 fragment (CYFRA21‐1) (2.2 ± 0.9 vs 1.9 ± 0.8 μg/L; P < .001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (3.4 ± 2.2 vs 2.1 ± 1.2 μg/L; P < .001), carbohydrate antigens (CA) 125 (18.1 ± 13.5 vs 10.5 ± 4.6 μg/L; P < .001), and 153 (14.4 ± 8.9 vs 10.1 ± 4.4 μg/L; P < .001) in COVID‐19 mild cases as compared to normal control subjects; their levels showed continuous and significant increases in severe and critical cases (HE4, CYFRA21‐1, and CA125: P < .001; CEA and CA153: P < .01). Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) and CA199 increased significantly only in critical cases of COVID‐19 as compared with mild and severe cases and normal controls (P < .01). There were positive associations between levels of C‐reactive protein and levels of HE4 (R = .631; P < .001), CYFRA21‐1 (R = .431; P < .001), CEA (R = .316; P < .001), SCC (R = .351; P < .001), CA153 (R = .359; P < .001) and CA125 (R = .223; P = .031). We concluded that elevations of serum cancer biomarkers positively correlated with the pathological progressions of COVID‐19, demonstrating diffuse and acute pathophysiological injuries in COVID‐19.

Background: COVID-19 patients develop hypolipidemia. However, it is unknown whether lipid levels have improved and there are potential sequlae in recovered patients. Objective: In this follow-up study, we evaluated serum lipidemia and various physiopathological laboratory values in recovered patients. Methods: A 3–6 month follow-up study was performed between June 15 and September 3, 2020, to examine serum levels of laboratory values in 107 discharged COVID-19 patients (mild = 59; severe/critical = 48; diagnoses on admission). Sixty-one patients had a revisit chest CT scan. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze changes in laboratory values at admission and follow-up. Results: LDL-c and HDL-c levels were significantly higher at follow-up than at admission in severe/critical cases (p < 0.05). LDL-c levels were significantly higher at follow-up than at admission in mild cases (p < 0.05). Coagulation and liver functional values were significantly improved at follow-up than at admission for patients (p < 0.05). Increases in HDL-c significantly correlated with increases in numbers of white blood cells (p < 0.001) during patients’ recovery. With exclusion of the subjects taking traditional Chinese medicines or cholesterol-lowering drugs, LDL-c and HDL-c levels were significantly increased at follow-up than at admission in severe/critical cases (p < 0.05). Residue lesions were observed in CT images in 72% (44 of 61) of follow-up patients. Conclusions: Improvements of LDL-c, HDL-c, liver functions, and incomplete resolution of lung lesions were observed at 3–6 month follow-up for recovered patients, indicating that a long-term recovery process could be required and the development of sequelae such as pulmonary fibrosis could be expected in some patients.

Purposes: To evaluate the diagnostic value of tumor-educated platelets (TEP) lncRNA ROR for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: Quantitative real-time PCR was used to determine the expression level of TEP lncRNA ROR in NPC patients (n = 50) as compared to normal subjects (n = 33). The ROC curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of TEP lncRNA ROR for NPC. Correlations between TEP lncRNA ROR and clinical parameters were further analyzed. Results: The median of TEP lncRNA ROR was significantly lower in NPC patients than that in normal subjects (0.0209 vs 0.0610, p = 0.0019), while no significant difference was found in plasma lncRNA ROR. ROC analysis showed that TEP lncRNA ROR had a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 70%, and accuracy of 63.9% in diagnosing NPC, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.70. The expression level of TEP lncRNA ROR in NPC showed no significant difference among different TNM stages. However, low level of TEP lncRNA ROR correlated well with positive Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA (kappa value = 0.314, p = 0.06), TEP lncRNA ROR and EBV DNA had similar diagnostic positive rate (58.3%) for NPC, and the combination of TEP lncRNA ROR and EBV DNA increased the positive rate to 74%. Conclusion: The expression level of TEP lncRNA ROR was down-regulated in NPC and the diagnostic value of TEP lncRNA ROR was similar to EBV DNA. Our study indicated that TEP lncRNA ROR might serve as a novel type of liquid biopsy biomarker in diagnosis of NPC patients.

Background: Differential diagnosis between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging in clinical practice; thus, in-patients diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis were retrospectively enrolled, and diagnostic values of ascitic tumor markers and adenosine deaminase were determined. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis were retrospectively enrolled. The pertinent data of 169 patients enrolled were collected. Results: A panel of ascitic tumor makers (CEA, CA15-3, CA19-9) had high specificity (96.83%) and accuracy (94.67%) in the differentiation of peritoneal carcinomatosis from tuberculous peritonitis; and ascitic ADA was a good discriminator between these patients, with an accuracy of 91.72%. Combined use of ascitic tumor makers and ADA (ascitic ADA < 22.5 IU/L or ascitic CEA > 3.65 ng/mL or CA15-3 > 42.70 U/mL or CA19-9 > 25.10 U/mL) performed high sensitivity (99.06%) and accuracy (94.08%) for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In addition, combined ascitic ADA and tumor marker (positive ascitic tumor makers and ADA < 22.50 IU/L) had 100% of the specificity in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis. Conclusions: Combined use of ascitic tumor markers and adenosine deaminase showed excellent efficiency in the differential diagnosis between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis, thus these two simple and cost‐effective parameters should be determined when tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis was suspected in clinic practice.

Background: Gastrointestinal infections (GI) and urological infections (UI) have not been fully addressed in COVID‐19 patients. We aimed to evaluate the values of routine fecal occult blood (FOB) test and urinary cytology test (UCT) for screening of GI and UI in COVID‐19 patients.Methods: In this retrospective study, COVID‐19 patients without associated comorbidities were divided into FOB‐ or UCT‐positive or FOB‐ or UCT‐negative groups. Their clinical characteristics and laboratory findings were then compared.Results: A total of 13.6% of patients (47 of 345) tested positive for FOB, and 57.4% (27 of 47) of these patients lacked gastrointestinal symptoms. A total of 30.1% of patients (104 of 345) exhibited gastrointestinal symptoms, and 38.0% (131 of 345) were positive for either FOB or gastrointestinal symptoms. FOB‐positive patients possessed significantly higher levels of C‐reactive protein and fewer lymphocytes than FOB‐negative patients. A total of 36.9% of patients (80 of 217) exhibited positive UCT, and 97.5% (78 of 80) of these patients possessed normal levels of serum markers for renal injuries. Significant differences in age and sex ratios were observed between the UCT‐positive and UCT‐negative groups, and 72.4% (42 of 58) of female patients over 60 years old were UCT‐positive.Conclusions: Fecal occult blood test in combination with gastrointestinal symptoms could serve as a simple and useful screening approach for GI diagnoses for COVID‐19. Age and sex are risk factors for UI in COVID‐19 patients. UCT could be a sensitive tool for assessing early UI at a stage in which serum markers for renal injuries appear normal.