In recent decades, immune checkpoint blockade and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy are two milestone achievements in clinical immunotherapy. However, both show limited efficacies in most solid neoplasms, which necessitates the exploration of new immunotherapeutic modalities. The failure of CAR-T and immune checkpoint blockade in several solid neoplasms is attributed to multiple factors, including low antigenicity of tumor cells, low infiltration of effector T cells, and diverse mechanisms of immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. New adoptive cell therapies have been attempted for solid neoplasms, including TCR-T, CAR-natural killer cells (CAR-NK), and CAR-macrophages (CAR-M). Compared to CAR-T, these new adoptive cell therapies have certain advantages in treating solid neoplasms. In this review, we summarized the 40-year evolution of adoptive cell therapies, then focused on the advances of TCR-T, CAR-NK, and CAR-M in solid neoplasms and discussed their potential clinical applications.

Objective: To present comprehensive information on the clinicopathological, molecular, survival characteristics, and quality of life (QOL) after surgery for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas in a large cohort after long-term follow-up. Background: SPN is a rare tumor with an uncertain malignant potential, and solid information on long-term prognosis and QOL remains limited. Methods: All hospitalized patients with SPNs who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2021 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were retrieved. A cross-sectional telephone questionnaire was administered to inquire about the QOL. Molecular analyses were performed using whole-exome sequencing. Results: Exactly 454 patients with SPN were enrolled, of whom 18.5% were males and 81.5% were females. The mean patient age was 31 ± 12 years. In total, 61.3% of the patients had no symptoms. The size of the tumors was 5.38 ± 3.70 cm; 83.4% were solid cystic tumors, and 40.1% had calcifications. The proportions of local resection, distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pylorus preservation were 29.7%, 28.9% or 22.9%, and 11% or 6.8%, respectively. Over the years, there has been a significant shift from open to minimally invasive surgery. Among all surgical procedures, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) had the highest incidence of grade 2 to 4 complications (up to 32.3%), compared with 6.7% in distal pancreatectomy (P < 0.001). Regarding histopathology, tissue invasion, perineural invasion, cancerous microvascular emboli, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were present in 16.5%, 2.2%, 0.7%, 2.0%, and 3.1% of patients, respectively. Sixty patients were lost to follow-up. Sixteen of the 390 patients who underwent resection (4.1%) experienced local recurrence or distant metastasis after surgery. In total, 361 patients responded to the telephone survey. Nearly 80% of patients claimed their QOL was not significantly affected after surgery; however, the remaining 20% complained of lower QOL during 3 to 6 years of follow-up after surgery. No clinicopathological factor could reliably predict clinical recurrence or metastasis after resection. A total of 28 driver genes were detected with mutations in at least 2 tumor samples and the top 3 frequently mutated genes were CTNNB1, ATRNL1, and MUC16. Conclusions: This study presented the largest cohort of patients with SPN after surgery from a single center and reported the QOL of these patients. SPN is associated with extremely favorable long-term survival, even in patients with metastasis, and most patients have a good QOL after surgery.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is notoriously resistant to both chemotherapy and immunotherapy, presenting a major therapeutic challenge. Epigenetic modifications play a critical role in PC progression, yet their contribution to chemoimmunotherapy resistance remains poorly understood. Here, we identified the transcription factor ZEB1 as a critical driver of chemoimmunotherapy resistance in PC. ZEB1 knockdown synergized with gemcitabine and anti–PD-1 therapy, markedly suppressed PC growth, and prolonged survival in vivo. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics revealed that ZEB1 ablation promoted tumor pyroptosis by recruiting and activating GZMA ⁺ CD8 ⁺ T cells in the tumor core through epigenetic upregulation of CXCL16 . Meanwhile, ZEB1 blockade attenuates CD44 ⁺ neutrophil–induced CD8 ⁺ T cell exhaustion by reducing tumor-derived SPP1 secretion, which otherwise promotes exhaustion through activation of the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway. Clinically, high ZEB1 expression correlated with chemoresistance, immunosuppression, and diminished CXCL16 levels in patients with PC. Importantly, the epigenetic inhibitor mocetinostat (targeting ZEB1) potentiated the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy, including anti–PD-1 and CAR T therapies, in patient-derived organoids, xenografts, and orthotopic models. Our study unveils ZEB1 as a master epigenetic regulator of chemoimmunotherapy resistance and proposes its targeting as a transformative strategy for PC treatment.

Background: Postoperative intra-abdominal infection (PIAI) is one of the most serious complications of abdominal surgery, increasing the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality and prolonging hospital stay. Rapid diagnosis of PIAI is of great clinical value. Unfortunately, the current diagnostic methods of PIAI are not fast and accurate enough. Methods: The authors performed an exploratory study to establish a rapid and accurate diagnostic method of PIAI. The authors explored the turnaround time and accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing PIAI. Patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery and routine abdominal drainage with suspected PIAI were enroled in the study. The fresh midstream abdominal drainage fluid was collected for mNGS and culturing. Results: The authors found that the median sample-to-answer turnaround time of mNGS was dramatically decreased than that of culture-based methods (<24 h vs. 59.5–111 h). The detection coverage of mNGS was much broader than culture-based methods. The authors found 26 species from 15 genera could only be detected by mNGS. The accuracy of mNGS was not inferior to culture-based methods in the 8 most common pathogens detected from abdominal drainage fluid (sensitivity ranged from 75 to 100%, specificity ranged from 83.3 to 100%, and kappa values were higher than 0.5). Moreover, the composition of the microbial spectrum established by mNGS varied between upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery, enhancing the understanding of PIAI pathogenesis. Conclusion: This study preliminarily revealed the clinical value of mNGS in the rapid diagnosis of PIAI and provided a rationale for further research.

The diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) can be challenging due to potential confusion with other pancreatic neoplasms, particularly pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), using current pathological diagnostic markers. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of bulk RNA sequencing data from SPNs, NETs, and normal pancreas, followed by experimental validation. This analysis revealed an increased accumulation of peroxisomes in SPNs. Moreover, we observed significant upregulation of the peroxisome marker ABCD1 in both primary and metastatic SPN samples compared with normal pancreas and NETs. To further investigate the potential utility of ABCD1 as a diagnostic marker for SPN via immunohistochemistry staining, we conducted verification in a large-scale patient cohort with pancreatic tumors, including 127 SPN (111 primary, 16 metastatic samples), 108 NET (98 nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, NF-NET, and 10 functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, F-NET), 9 acinar cell carcinoma (ACC), 3 pancreatoblastoma (PB), 54 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 20 pancreatic serous cystadenoma (SCA), 19 pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma (MCA), 12 pancreatic ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) and 5 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) samples. Our results indicate that ABCD1 holds promise as an easily applicable diagnostic marker with exceptional efficacy (AUC=0.999, sensitivity=99.10%, specificity=100%) for differentiating SPN from NET and other pancreatic neoplasms through immunohistochemical staining.