Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a Mendelian disease characterized by multigenic phenotypes. Previous reports indicated a higher rate of thromboembolic events (TEEs) in SCD patients. A number of candidate polymorphisms in certain genes (e.g., FVL, PRT, and MTHFR) were previously reported as risk factors for TEEs in different clinical conditions. This study aimed to genotype these genes and other loci predicted to underlie TEEs in SCD patients. Methodology: A multi-center genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving Saudi SCD adult patients with a history of TEEs (n = 65) and control patients without TEE history (n = 285) was performed. Genotyping used the 10× Affymetrix Axiom array, which includes 683,030 markers. Fisher’s exact test was used to generate p-values of TEE associations with each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). The haplotype analysis software tool version 1.05, designed by the University of Göttingen, Germany, was used to identify the common inherited haplotypes. Results: No association was identified between the targeted single-nucleotide polymorphism rs1801133 in MTHFR and TEEs in SCD (p = 0.79). The allele frequency of rs6025 in FVL and rs1799963 in PRT in our cohort was extremely low (<0.01); thus, both variants were excluded from the analysis as no meaningful comparison was possible. In contrast, the GWAS analysis showed novel genome-wide associations (p < 5 × 10⁻⁸) with seven signals; five of them were located on Chr 11 (rs35390334, rs331532, rs317777, rs147062602, and rs372091), one SNP on Chr 20 (rs139341092), and another on Chr 9 (rs76076035). The other 34 SNPs located on known genes were also detected at a signal threshold of p < 5 × 10⁻⁶. Seven of the identified variants are located in olfactory receptor family 51 genes (OR51B5, OR51V1, OR51A1P, and OR51E2), and five variants were related to family 52 genes (OR52A5, OR52K1, OR52K2, and OR52T1P). The previously reported association between rs5006884-A in OR51B5 and fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels was confirmed in our study, which showed significantly lower levels of HbF (p = 0.002) and less allele frequency (p = 0.003) in the TEE cases than in the controls. The assessment of the haplotype inheritance pattern involved the top ten significant markers with no LD (rs353988334, rs317777, rs14788626882, rs49188823, rs139349992, rs76076035, rs73395847, rs1368823, rs8888834548, and rs1455957). A haplotype analysis revealed significant associations between two haplotypes (a risk, TT-AA-del-AA-ins-CT-TT-CC-CC-AA, and a reverse protective, CC-GG-ins-GG-del-TT-CC-TT-GG-GG) and TEEs in SCD (p = 0.024, OR = 6.16, CI = 1.34–28.24, and p = 0.019, OR = 0.33, CI = 0.13–0.85, respectively). Conclusions: Seven markers showed novel genome-wide associations; two of them were exonic variants (rs317777 in OLFM5P and rs147062602 in OR51B5), and less significant associations (p < 5 × 10⁻⁶) were identified for 34 other variants in known genes with TEEs in SCD. Moreover, two 10-SNP common haplotypes were determined with contradictory effects. Further replication of these findings is needed.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a common genetic disorder affecting up to 2.6% of the population in Saudi Arabia. SCD results in severe disability, reduced quality of life, extensive use of medical resources, increased economic burden, and a high likelihood of increased mortality. Red blood cell transfusion remains a cornerstone in the management of SCD complications. This position paper highlights the current state of SCD management within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Despite the advantages of automated red blood cell exchange (aRBCX) and guideline recommendations, its use remains limited. In practice, aRBCX is used for a variety of indications, including acute management and prophylaxis of stroke, systemic fat embolism, severe forms of acute chest syndrome, preoperative management, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, hepatic crisis, and priapism. However, aRBCX is underutilized in pregnancy. Common gaps identified by the advisory panel include the absence of standardized national guidelines, limited access to aRBCX, issues with vascular access, lack of equipment, and insufficient staff training. Another limitation to the use of aRBCX is the higher blood requirements compared to other blood transfusion modalities. These factors contribute to geographical disparities in the management of SCD and suboptimal patient outcomes. To address these issues, the advisory panel recommended developing and implementing evidence-based national guidelines, expanding access to aRBCX, enhancing health staff education and training, and establishing a robust national SCD registry. By prioritizing these recommendations, we can help streamline SCD care, reduce practice variation, and nationalize sickle cell disease management in Saudi Arabia to improve patient care.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe inherited blood disorder characterized by abnormal hemoglobin (HbS) that leads to varying degrees of severity, including chronic hemolysis, episodic vaso-occlusion, and damage to multiple organs, causing significant morbidity and mortality. While SCD is a monogenic disease, its complications are influenced by polygenic factors. SCD prevalence is notably high in regions including the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia reporting significant cases, particularly in the Eastern Province. Most genetic factors associated with SCD outcomes have been identified in populations predominantly from Africa or of African ancestry. This study aims to identify genetic variants that characterize Saudi SCD patients with the potential to influence disease outcomes in this population. A multicenter case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted involving 350 adult Saudi SCD patients and 202 healthy controls. Participants were genotyped using the Affymetrix Axiom array, covering 683,030 markers. Rigorous quality control measures were applied to ensure data integrity. Fisher’s exact was used to identify genetic variants with a significant difference in allele frequency (p < 5 × 10⁻⁸). Functional annotations and regulatory functions of variants were determined using the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) and RegulomeDB databases. The GWAS identified numerous significant genetic variants characterizing SCD cases in the Saudi population. These variants, distributed across multiple chromosomes, were found in genes with known functional consequences. A substantial proportion of the markers were detected in the olfactory receptor cluster, TRIM family, and HBB locus genes. Many of the identified genes were reported in previous studies showing significant associations with various SCD outcomes, including hemoglobin regulation, inflammation, immune response, and vascular function. The findings highlight the genetic complexity underlying SCD and its clinical manifestations. The identified variants suggest potential molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets, enhancing our understanding of the molecular basis of SCD in the Saudi population. This is the first genetic analysis characterizing SCD patients compared to healthy individuals, uncovering genetic markers that could serve as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Given the known molecular mechanisms of the detected genetic loci, these provide a foundation for precision medicine in SCD management, highlighting the need for further studies to validate these results and explore their clinical implications.