Clifford Connell

Dr. Clifford Connell


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in Resuscitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSimon Cooper
Simon Cooper
RCRobyn P. Cant
Robyn P. Cant
CCClifford Connell
Clifford Connell
LSLyndall Sims
Lyndall Sims
JPJoanne E Porter
Joanne E Porter
SLSok Ying Liaw
Sok Ying Liaw

11 May 2020 in Annals of Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPatricia Schwerdtle
Patricia Schwerdtle
CCClifford Connell
Clifford Connell
SLSusan Lee
Susan Lee
VPVirginia Plummer
Virginia Plummer
PRPhilip L. Russo
Philip L. Russo
LKLisa Kuhn
Lisa Kuhn

1 September 2016 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCClifford Connell
Clifford Connell
RERuth Endacott
Ruth Endacott
JJJennifer A. Jackman
Jennifer A. Jackman
NKNoelleen Kiprillis
Noelleen Kiprillis
LSLouise M. Sparkes
Louise M. Sparkes
SCSimon J. Cooper
Simon J. Cooper

1 January 2021 in International Journal of Nursing Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHPheona van Huizen
Pheona van Huizen
LKLisa Kuhn
Lisa Kuhn
PRPhilip L. Russo
Philip L. Russo
CCClifford Connell
Clifford Connell

1 May 2018 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCatherine Chung
Catherine Chung
SCSimon J. Cooper
Simon J. Cooper
RCRobyn P. Cant
Robyn P. Cant
CCClifford Connell
Clifford Connell
AMAngela McKay
Angela McKay
TBTom Breakspear
Tom Breakspear

10 March 2025 in Anatomical Sciences Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJames Bonnamy
James Bonnamy
BCBethany Carr
Bethany Carr
MLMichelle D. Lazarus
Michelle D. Lazarus
CCClifford Connell
Clifford Connell
Validity is a key element of many forms of research—particularly surveys, which are often used in health professions education research. A survey must accurately measure what it is intended to measure to be considered valid. This is becoming increasingly difficult in the age of artificial intelligence (AI), where “bots” (short for robots) are challenging researchers' abilities to deliver valid surveys. While financial incentives were once considered the gold standard method for survey recruitment and participant reimbursement, emerging technologies help bad actors in taking advantage of these incentives, jeopardizing the validity of survey research. In this short communication, we share a case study illustrating how online surveys can be sabotaged by bad actors. We aim to expand researchers' awareness of this challenge to survey validity and offer guidance to maximize their ability to deliver psychometrically valid surveys in health professions education research.