Eugenio Romeo

Prof. Eugenio Romeo

University of Milan, Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 September 2004 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eugenio RomeoEugenio Romeo
Eugenio Romeo
MGMarco Ghisolfi
Marco Ghisolfi
NMNicola Murgolo
Nicola Murgolo
MCMatteo Chiapasco
Matteo Chiapasco
Diego  Lops Diego Lops
Diego Lops
GVGiorgio Vogel
Giorgio Vogel

20 December 2006 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eugenio RomeoEugenio Romeo
Eugenio Romeo
Diego  Lops Diego Lops
Diego Lops
MCMatteo Chiapasco
Matteo Chiapasco
MGMarco Ghisolfi
Marco Ghisolfi
GVGiorgio Vogel
Giorgio Vogel

10 February 2006 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eugenio RomeoEugenio Romeo
Eugenio Romeo
Diego  Lops Diego Lops
Diego Lops
LALeonardo Amorfini
Leonardo Amorfini
MCMatteo Chiapasco
Matteo Chiapasco
MGMarco Ghisolfi
Marco Ghisolfi
GVGiorgio Vogel
Giorgio Vogel

1 June 2008 in Journal of Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eugenio RomeoEugenio Romeo
Eugenio Romeo
Diego  Lops Diego Lops
Diego Lops
ARAlessandro Rossi
Alessandro Rossi
SSStefano Storelli
Stefano Storelli
RRRoberto Rozza
Roberto Rozza
MCMatteo Chiapasco
Matteo Chiapasco
Background: Gingival esthetics around dental implants have become a main focus for clinicians. This study analyzed the surgical, prosthetic, and anatomic factors involved in the management of peri-implant tissues. Methods: Forty-eight subjects with one tooth scheduled for tooth extraction and immediate implant placement were included in the study. After healing, the implants were restored with single-crown fixed prostheses. The following parameters were assessed after 12 months: presence/absence of the interproximal papilla, interimplant–tooth distance (ITD), distance from the base of the contact point to the interdental bone (CPB), and soft tissue biotype. ITD and CPB values were derived from computer analysis of periapical radiographs. A statistical analysis determined the effect of ITD and CPB on the presence of the interproximal papilla. Results: Papilla was significantly present (P <0.05) for ITD of 2.5 to 4 mm in anterior and posterior areas and for CPB ≤7 mm in posterior areas. Thick biotype was significantly associated (P <0.05) with the presence of the papilla. Conclusions: The combination of surgical and prosthetic plans represents the key factor to optimize predictability in single-implant esthetics. The recommended interproximal distance between the implant and the adjacent tooth is 2.5 to 4 mm. The distance from the contact point to the interdental bone is recommended to be <7 mm. Papilla presence is also correlated with a thick gingival biotype.

21 April 2002 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eugenio RomeoEugenio Romeo
Eugenio Romeo
MCM. Chiapasco
M. Chiapasco
MGM. Ghisolfi
M. Ghisolfi
GVG. Vogel
G. Vogel

1 October 2002 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eugenio RomeoEugenio Romeo
Eugenio Romeo
MCMatteo Chiapasco
Matteo Chiapasco
ALAndrea Lazza
Andrea Lazza
PCPaolo Casentini
Paolo Casentini
MGMarco Ghisolfi
Marco Ghisolfi
GVGiorgio Vogel
Giorgio Vogel