The successful development of a chemoprophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 could provide a tool for infection prevention that is implementable alongside vaccination programmes. Nafamostat is a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits SARS-CoV-2 entry in vitro, but it has not been characterised for chemoprophylaxis in animal models. Clinically, nafamostat is limited to intravenous delivery and has an extremely short plasma half-life. This study sought to determine whether intranasal dosing of nafamostat at 5 mg/kg twice daily was able to prevent the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from infected to uninfected Syrian Golden hamsters. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detectable in the throat swabs of the water-treated control group 4 days after cohabitation with a SARS-CoV-2 inoculated hamster. However, throat swabs from the intranasal nafamostat-treated hamsters remained SARS-CoV-2 RNA negative for the full 4 days of cohabitation. Significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations were seen in the nasal turbinates of the nafamostat-treated group compared to the control (p = 0.001). A plaque assay quantified a significantly lower concentration of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs of the nafamostat-treated group compared to the control (p = 0.035). When taken collectively with the pathological changes observed in the lungs and nasal mucosa, these data are strongly supportive of the utility of intranasally delivered nafamostat for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Pibrentasvir (PIB) has been demonstrated to block exonuclease activity of the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase, protecting favipiravir (FVP) and remdesivir (RDV) from post-incorporation excision and eliciting antiviral synergy in vitro. The present study investigated the chemoprophylactic efficacy of PIB, FVP, RDV, FVP with PIB, or RDV with PIB dosed intranasally twice a day, using a Syrian golden hamster contact transmission model. Compared to the saline control, viral RNA levels were significantly lower in throat swabs in FVP (day 7), RDV (day 3, 5, 7), and RDV+PIB (day 3, 5) treatment groups. Similarly, findings were evident for nasal turbinate after PIB and RDV treatment, and lungs after PIB, FVP, and FVP+PIB treatment at day 7. Lung viral RNA levels after RDV and RDV+PIB treatment were only detectable in two animals per group, but the overall difference was not statistically significant. In situ examination of the lungs confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in all animals, except for one in each of the RDV and RDV+PIB treatment groups, which tested negative in all virus detection approaches. Overall, prevention of transmission was observed in most animals treated with RDV, while other agents reduced the viral load following contact transmission. No benefit of combining FVP or RDV with PIB was observed.

Favipiravir (FVP) and remdesivir (RDV) have demonstrable antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Here, the efficacy of FVP, RDV, and FVP with RDV (FVP + RDV) in combination was assessed in Syrian golden hamsters challenged with SARS-CoV- 2 (B.1.1.7) following intraperitoneal administration. At day 4 post infection, viral RNA and viral antigen expression were significantly lower in lungs for all three treatment groups compared to the sham treatment. Similarly, viral titres in the lungs were lower in all treatment groups compared to the sham treatment. The FVP + RDV combination was the only treatment group where viral RNA in nasal turbinate and lung, virus titres in lung, and viral antigen expression (lung) were all lower than those for the sham treatment group. Moreover, lower viral titre values were observed in the FVP + RDV group compared to other treatment groups, albeit only significantly lower in comparison to those in the RDV-only-treated group. Further assessment of the potential utility of FVP in combination with RDV may be warranted. Future studies should also consider whether the combination of these two drugs may reduce the speed at which drug resistance mutations are selected.

Nanogels are candidates for biomedical applications, and core-shell nanogels offer the potential to tune thermoresponsive behaviour with the capacity for extensive degradation. These properties were achieved by the combination of a core of poly(N-isopropylmethacrylamide) and a shell of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), both crosslinked with the degradable crosslinker N,N′-bis(acryloyl)cystamine. In this work, the degradation behaviour of these nanogels was characterised using asymmetric flow field flow fractionation coupled with multi-angle and dynamic light scattering. By monitoring the degradation products of the nanogels in real-time, it was possible to identify three distinct stages of degradation: nanogel swelling, nanogel fragmentation, and nanogel fragment degradation. The results indicate that the core-shell nanogels degrade slower than their non-core-shell counterparts, possibly due to a higher degree of self-crosslinking reactions occurring in the shell. The majority of the degradation products had molecule weights below 10 kDa, which suggests that they may be cleared through the kidneys. This study provides important insights into the design and characterisation of degradable nanogels for biomedical applications, highlighting the need for accurate characterisation techniques to measure the potential biological impact of nanogel degradation products.

The spread of respiratory viruses, such as Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 has presented significant challenges over the last 30 years with few effective therapeutic options available to this day. Bi-cyclic peptides represent a unique, modular, modality in the antiviral armamentarium against future pandemics. This study provides a deeper evaluation of multivalent bi-cyclic (Bicycle®) molecule efficacy in several preclinical SARS-CoV-2 challenge settings. We explore both pre-exposure prophylaxis and post-exposure therapeutic settings via subcutaneous and intranasal routes of administration. We contextualize this further in bespoke scenarios of immune compromisation, and viral transmission. Promisingly, in all studies we observe efficacy, significantly reducing infectious viral burden at each study endpoint. These data further support candidacy of Bicycle molecules as a differentiated antiviral therapeutic class in the context of pandemic preparedness.

Ronapreve, a combination of two neutralising monoclonal antibodies, casirivimab and imdevimab, was amongst the authorised treatments against SARS-CoV-2 early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Ronapreve has lost some of its efficiency with the rise of new virus variants, however, it remains a valuable tool for experimental studies to gain insights into the mechanisms and effects of anti-viral drugs. In this study we combined morphological, pharmacokinetic and molecular approaches (including multiomics) to investigate the biodistribution of Ronapreve in the K18-hACE2 murine model of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion, as well as possible consequences for the brain. We also investigated the effect of the treatment on the infection status. Our results showed that after intraperitoneal injection, Ronapreve accumulates in the serum and is unable to cross the blood-brain barrier, thus not reaching the brain parenchyma; treatment has only a minimal effect on the brain transcriptome, with no significant changes in the brain lipidome or metabolome. Nonetheless, post-exposure Ronapreve treatment resulted in reduced viral loads in the lung and, in particular, the brain, with markedly reduced tissue response in the brain, as shown by the transcriptomic analysis. The results suggest a peripheral mode of action of Ronapreve to block brain infection, possibly by lowering viral replication in the nasal epithelium, reducing a subsequent spread to the brain.