Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the effects of different demographic and perioperative modalities on mortality rates and (2) to compare mortality rates between different implants in elderly patients operated on for hip fractures. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 314 patients who were operated on for hip fractures were included study. Patients were then divided into four groups based in their implant types: long-stem cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (n = 124; 102 female, 22 male; mean age = 84.2 ± 6.4 years), standard-stem cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (n = 74; 48 female, 26 male; mean age = 83.5 ± 6.9 years), antegrade intertrochanteric nail (n = 61; 35 female, 26 male; mean age = 78.5 ± 6.8 years), and total hip arthroplasty (n = 55; 34 female, 21 male; mean age = 72.5 ± 4.3 years). Data including gender, age, duration from injury to surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, use of antiplatelet agents, Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living, type of anesthesia, operation time, preoperative hemoglobin values, blood transfusions given, duration of hospital stay, complications, and type of fracture were recorded. Results: Overall, the mean follow-up was 36.5 (range = 0 – 107) months. The overall mortality rate was 53.2%. The median survival duration was 44.2 ± 5 months (range = 34.3 – 54). Survival rates were found significantly different among the groups (P = 0.001). In the first three years postoperatively, the mortality rate was higher in the standard-stem bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, but in the long-term follow-up, the long-stem bipolar hemiarthroplasty group exhibited the higher mortality rates. It was observed that some parameters had statistically significant effects on the mortality rates. Male gender, higher age, lower hemoglobin values, increased number of blood transfusions, ASA scores ≥3, the existence of ≥ 3 comorbidities were found as main predictors of increased mortality rates. Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that age, gender, preoperative hemoglobin levels, ASA scores, and comorbidities are significant factors affecting mortality in elderly patients operated on for hip fractures. Long-stem cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty appears to show similar rates of mortality with standard-stem cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic Study Cite this article as: Biçen Ç, Akdemir M, Türken MA, et al. Analysis of risk factors affecting mortality in elderly patients operated on for hip fractures: A retrospective comparative study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2021; 55(6): 493–499.

Background: Rotator cuff tears commonly cause shoulder pain and functional impairment, prompting surgical intervention such as mini-open and arthroscopic methods, each with distinct benefits. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of these two approaches. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 165 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair using either arthroscopic-assisted mini-open or full arthroscopic approaches. Patient demographics, tear characteristics, clinical outcomes, and complications were assessed, with statistical analyses conducted to discern differences between the groups.Results: Among the patients, 74 (53.2%) received the mini-open approach, while 65 (46.8%) underwent arthroscopic repair, with a mean follow-up of 19.91 months. The mini-open group exhibited significantly higher postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores compared to the arthroscopic group (P=0.002). Additionally, the mini-open group demonstrated a more significant improvement in ASES scores from preoperative to postoperative assessments (P=0.001). However, the arthroscopic method had a significantly longer operative time (P<0.001). Complications, including anchor placement issues, frozen shoulder, infection, and re-rupture, occurred in 17.3% of patients overall. Re-rupture rates were 13.5% for mini-open and 6.2% for full arthroscopic repair, with no significant difference between the two methods (P=0.317).Conclusions: Both the mini-open and arthroscopic methods yielded favorable clinical outcomes for rotator cuff tear treatment, but the mini-open group exhibited superior results. Surgeons should consider patient characteristics, tear attributes, and surgical expertise when selecting the appropriate technique.Level of evidence: III.

There are ongoing wars worldwide, during which significant numbers of people are injured. Several studies have indicated that high rates of depression and anxiety are seen in war-injured patients. Eighty-one male patients treated between November 2019 and January 2021 far from home in a Turkish hospital due to war injuries that happened in the Libyan Civil War were investigated. Demographic characteristics and injury data of the patients were evaluated regarding age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), location of injuries, type and mechanism of injuries, operations, and accompanying traumas. The psychological statuses of the patients were evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) records filled out at the first admission to the hospital. The mean age of the patients was 29.8±7.7 (19-56) years. While 59 patients had fractures, 22 patients had only soft tissue injuries. Eighteen patients suffered from other accompanying injuries. While 85.2% of the patients showed symptoms of depression, 82.7% of the patients suffered from anxiety and PTSD symptoms were seen in 86.4% of the patients. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate the effects of injury severity, duration of hospitalization, number of operations, and age on depression, anxiety, and PTSD among these patients with war injuries. The results did not indicate any significant effect of injury severity, hospitalization duration, or operations. Depression, anxiety, and PTSD are common in patients injured in wars. Injury severity does not seem to affect depression, anxiety, or PTSD in these patients.

Background and Purpose: Arthrosis of the first MTP joint is a common condition. Among the available arthrodesis methods, plate/screw and screw methods are the current treatment methods of choice. In this study, we investigate whether there is a difference between these two methods. Methods: Thirty-four toes of 32 patients with advanced arthrosis were included in the study. Eighteen toes were fixed with plates/screws and 16 with cross-screws. In the radiological evaluations, malunion and nonunion were examined. Clinical evaluation was made according to AOFAS-HMI scoring. Results: The mean age of the patients was 57.74 years and the mean follow-up period was 22.21 months. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical scores or union times between the two groups. As complications, superficial skin problems developed in 2 (5.9%) cases, deep infection in 3 (8.8%) cases, and nonunion in 3 (8.8%) cases. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in this regard. Conclusion: Plate/screw and cross-screw techniques give similar clinical and radiological results in cases of arthrodesis of the first MTP joint. The cross-screw technique, which can be performed more easily and has lower costs, should be the first choice.

Introduction Humerus shaft fractures may be treated conservatively or surgically. In 2.5% to 13% of cases, nonunion is observed, and it leads to severe pain and morbidity. Plate osteosynthesis has become popular in the treatment of nonunion of the humeral shaft. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients with humerus shaft nonunion whom we treated with single- or double-plate fixation. Materials and Methods Fifty-three patients diagnosed with aseptic humeral shaft nonunion and treated with plate fixation were included in the study. Patients were evaluated according to the number of plates (single vs. double plates). The two groups were subjected to statistical evaluation according to their clinical and radiographical results. Results The average age of the patients was 53 years (range: 1-86); 28 (52.8%) were female and 25 (47.2%) were male. The union rate was 90.32% for single plate and 90.91% for double plate fixation. There was no statistically significant difference between single and double plates in the clinical and radiographical results (union time, union rate, Q-DASH score) (p > 0.05). There was a significant correlation between age and union times / Q-DASH scores according to the Spearman correlation test (p < 0.05). Transient radial nerve neuropraxia developed in 2 patients and 1 patient suffered from an infection that was treated with debridement and antibiotic therapy. Conclusion In our study, similar good results were obtained with single and double plates. In treatment of humeral shaft nonunions, a second plate is not needed if enough stability is provided with single plate fixation. Level of evidence III, Retrospective comparative study.

Background Distal radius fractures are common fractures. Treatment of intra-articular fractures is controversial, with treatment modalities including closed reduction and casting, open reduction and plating, and closed reduction and fixation with an external fixator. In this study, we compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of our patients treated with three different methods for intra-articular distal radius fractures. We hypothesize that open reduction and plate application are superior. Methodology Adult patients with intra-articular (AO type B and C) fractures of the distal radius and treated with closed reduction-casting, volar locking plate, and external fixator were identified. Radiologically, joint stepping at the end of treatment, radial inclination, radial height, volar tilt, and distal ulna fracture were examined. For clinical scoring, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) scores were computed. Obtained data were compared statistically between groups. Results A total of 164 patients were included in the study. Overall, the treatment modality was conservative in 61, volar with plating in 78, and external fixation in 25. The mean age of the patients was 53.7 years (range = 20-82 years). Overall, 39.6% of the patients were male and 60.4% were female. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 16.7 months (range = 12-28 months). No statistically significant difference was found between Q-DASH scores in the statistical evaluation (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the radiological evaluation. When conservative treatment and the volar plate group were compared, the volar plate was superior in all radiological parameters (p < 0.05). Compared with conservative treatment and external fixation, only volar tilt and radial inclination angle were different. External fixation was better (p < 0.05). Radial length, volar compared to plate and external fixation tilt, and ulnar variance were better in the plate group (p < 0.05). Regarding joint stepping and radial, there was no difference in inclination between the two groups (p > 0.05). Reflex sympathetic dystrophy was seen in a total of 10 (6.1%) patients. Pin-site infection was seen in three (12%) patients in the external fixator group. Implant removal was performed in seven (9.0%) patients who developed plaque due to irritation and tenosynovitis. Early arthrosis was seen in three (4.3%) patients. Conclusions The treatment of distal radius intra-articular fractures should be evaluated and decided individually for each patient. No single method is directly superior to other methods. However, in some cases, the best results radiologically in the treatment of comminuted intra-articular fractures have been obtained in patients with volar plates.