- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi

Dr. - Mahnoosh Moghaddasi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2022 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KNKimia Naderi
Kimia Naderi
-M- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
ASAshkan Shokri
Ashkan Shokri

11 April 2017 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKS. Khajeh
S. Khajeh
SPSh. Paimozd
Sh. Paimozd
-M- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi

10 February 2023 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZHZahra Sadat Hosseini
Zahra Sadat Hosseini
-M- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
SPShahla Paimozd
Shahla Paimozd

18 February 2025 in Applied Water Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
-M- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
MMMansour Moradi
Mansour Moradi
MGMehdi Mohammadi GHaleni
Mehdi Mohammadi GHaleni
ZYZaher Mundher Yaseen
Zaher Mundher Yaseen
Drought assessment is inherently complex, particularly under the influences of climate change, which complicates long-term forecasting. This study introduces a novel hybrid deep learning model, Deep Feedforward Natural Networks (DFFNN), enhanced by War Strategy Optimization (WSO), aimed at forecasting the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) for lead times of one, three, six, nine, and twelve months. Key parameters of the DFFNN, including the number of neurons and layers, learning rate, training function, and weight initialization, were optimized using the WSO algorithm. The model’s performance was validated against two established optimizers: Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA). Evaluations were conducted at two synoptic stations with distinct climatic conditions in Iran. Results demonstrated that the WSO-DFFNN model achieved superior performance for SPEI 12 (t + 1) with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9961 and Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) of 0.1028; for SPEI 12 (t + 3) with r = 0.8856 and NRMSE = 0.1833; for SPEI 12 (t + 6) with r = 0.8573 and NRMSE = 0.2203; for SPEI 12 (t + 9) with r = 0.7951 and NRMSE = 0.2479; and for SPEI 12 (t + 12) with r = 0.7840 and NRMSE = 0.3279 at the Chabahar station. Additionally, the WSO-DFFNN model outperformed for SPEI 12 (t + 1) with r = 0.9118 and NRMSE = 0.1704; for SPEI 12 (t + 3) with r = 0.8386 and NRMSE = 0.2048; for SPEI 12 (t + 6) with r = 0.7602 and NRMSE = 0.2919; for SPEI 12 (t + 9) with r = 0.6379 and NRMSE = 0.2843; and for SPEI 12 (t + 12) with r = 0.6044 and NRMSE = 0.3463 at the Anzali station. The results obtained from this study have the potential to improve drought management strategies.

1 February 2024 in Water Practice & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTayybeh Mohammadi
Tayybeh Mohammadi
-M- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
SASedigheh Anvari
Sedigheh Anvari
RARizwan Aziz
Rizwan Aziz
This study aims to investigate the effects of climate change on return level of extreme maximum temperature (EMT) events in Iran. To this end, the CRU gridded dataset was used to collect EMT for the 1901–2014 period and future data were projected from four available CMIP6 models, where the BCC-CSM2-MR performed best under the latest Shared Socioeconomic Pathways-Representative concentration pathways (SSPs-RCPs) emission scenarios for the 2015–2100 period. The non-stationary state of the distribution was considered under three models GEV0 (location and scale parameters are constant), GEV1 (nonstationary of location), and GEV2 (nonstationary of scale) based on the evaluation criteria . The findings indicate that, when using a non-stationary approach and considering the SSP5-8.5 scenario for a 2-year return period, the return level of extreme temperature increased by up to +4°C compared with the stationary approach, while considering a non-stationary approach without climate change, the increase in the return level of extreme temperature was much smaller(up to +0.7°C). MCMC and DE-MC showed no significant differences and demonstrated that all stations are non-stationary in terms of the location parameter (GEV1).

15 January 2022 in Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
-M- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
- Mahnoosh Moghaddasi
SASedigheh Anvari
Sedigheh Anvari
NANajemeh Akhondi
Najemeh Akhondi