Cindy Veenhof

Prof. Dr. Cindy Veenhof

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 August 2010 in Arthritis Care & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMartijn F. Pisters
Martijn F. Pisters
CVCindy Veenhof
Cindy Veenhof
FSFrançois G. Schellevis
François G. Schellevis
JTJos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk
JDJoost Dekker
Joost Dekker
DBDinny H. De Bakker
Dinny H. De Bakker
Objective: To determine the effect of patient exercise adherence within the prescribed physical therapy treatment period and after physical therapy discharge on patient outcomes of pain, physical function, and patient self‐perceived effect in individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or knee.Methods: We performed a prospective observational followup study in which 150 patients with OA of the hip and/or knee receiving exercise therapy were followed for 60 months. Data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial, with assessments at baseline and 3, 15, and 60 months of followup. The association between exercise adherence and patient outcomes of pain, physical function, and self‐perceived effect was examined using generalized estimating equations analyses.Results: Adherence to recommended home exercises and being more physically active were significantly associated with better treatment outcomes of pain, self‐reported physical function, physical performance, and self‐perceived effect. The association between adherence and outcome was consistent over time. Adherence to home activities was only associated with better self‐perceived effect.Conclusion: Better adherence to recommended home exercises as well as being more physically active improves the long‐term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with OA of the hip and/or knee. Both within and after the treatment period, better adherence is associated with better patient outcomes of pain, physical function, and self‐perceived effect. Since exercise adherence declines over time, future research should focus on how exercise behavior can be stimulated and maintained in the long term.

28 September 2007 in Arthritis Care & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMartijn F. Pisters
Martijn F. Pisters
CVCindy Veenhof
Cindy Veenhof
NMNico L. U. van Meeteren
Nico L. U. van Meeteren
RORaymond Ostelo
Raymond Ostelo
DBDinny H. de Bakker
Dinny H. de Bakker
JDJoost Dekker
Joost Dekker
Objective: To determine the long‐term effectiveness (≥6 months after treatment) of exercise therapy on pain, physical function, and patient global assessment of effectiveness in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or knee.Methods: We conducted an extensive literature search in PubMed, EMBase, CINAHL, SciSearch, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Both randomized clinical trials and controlled clinical trials on the long‐term effectiveness of exercise therapy were included. The followup assessments were at least 6 months after treatment ended. Methodologic quality was independently assessed by 2 reviewers. Effect estimates were calculated and a best evidence synthesis was performed based on design, methodologic quality, and statistical significance of findings.Results: Five high‐quality and 6 low‐quality randomized clinical trials were included. Strong evidence was found for no long‐term effectiveness on pain and self‐reported physical function, moderate evidence for long‐term effectiveness on patient global assessment of effectiveness, and conflicting evidence for observed physical function. For exercise programs with additional booster sessions, moderate evidence was found for long‐term effectiveness on pain, self‐reported physical function, and observed physical function.Conclusion: The positive posttreatment effects of exercise therapy on pain and physical function in patients with OA of the hip and/or knee are not sustained in the long term. Long‐term effectiveness was only found for patient global assessment of effectiveness. However, additional booster sessions after the treatment period positively influenced maintenance of beneficial posttreatment effects on pain and physical function in the long term.

29 September 2006 in Arthritis Care & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGabriella M. van Dijk
Gabriella M. van Dijk
JDJoost Dekker
Joost Dekker
CVCindy Veenhof
Cindy Veenhof
CECornelia H. M. van Den Ende
Cornelia H. M. van Den Ende
Objective: To systematically review studies describing the course of functioning in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee and identifying potential prognostic factors.Methods: A systematic search was performed. Studies involving patients with hip or knee OA, >6 months of followup, and outcome measures on functional status or pain were included. Methodologic quality was assessed using a standardized set of 11 criteria; a qualitative data analysis was performed.Results: Approximately 6,500 titles and abstracts were screened and 48 publications were considered for inclusion. Eighteen studies, 4 of which met the high methodologic quality criteria, were included. For hip OA, there was limited evidence that functional status and pain do not change during the first 3 years of followup. After 3 years, however, a worsening of functional status and pain was seen. For knee OA, there was conflicting evidence for the first 3 years and limited evidence for worsening of pain and functional status after 3 years. Furthermore, limited evidence was established for negative associations between future functional status and laxity, proprioceptive inaccuracy, age, body mass index, and knee pain intensity. In contrast, greater muscle strength, better mental health, better self‐efficacy, social support, and more aerobic exercise were protective factors in the first 3 years.Conclusion: Pain and functional status in hip or knee OA seem to deteriorate slowly, with limited evidence for worsening after 3 years of followup. In specific subgroups, prognosis in the first 3 years of followup was either worse or better, as both risk factors and protective factors were identified. Prognostic factors included biomechanical factors, psychological factors, clinical factors, and treatment modalities. To strengthen the evidence, further high‐quality longitudinal research on hip or knee OA functioning is needed.

26 June 2008 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGabriella M van Dijk
Gabriella M van Dijk
CVCindy Veenhof
Cindy Veenhof
FSFrancois Schellevis
Francois Schellevis
HHHarry Hulsmans
Harry Hulsmans
JBJan Pj Bakker
Jan Pj Bakker
JDJoost Dekker
Joost Dekker
This study aims to contribute to the knowledge of the influence of comorbidity in OA. The objectives of the study were (i) to describe the prevalence of comorbidity and (ii) to describe the relationship between comorbidity (morbidity count, severity and the presence of specific diseases) and limitations in activities and pain in elderly patients with knee or hip OA using a comprehensive inventory of comorbidity.

22 November 2013 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDaniël Bossen
Daniël Bossen
CVCindy Veenhof
Cindy Veenhof
KBKarin Ec Van Beek
Karin Ec Van Beek
PSPeter Mm Spreeuwenberg
Peter Mm Spreeuwenberg
JDJoost Dekker
Joost Dekker
DBDinny H De Bakker
Dinny H De Bakker
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

28 August 2015 in Arthritis Care & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMariëtte de Rooij
Mariëtte de Rooij
MLMarike van der Leeden
Marike van der Leeden
MHMartijn W. Heymans
Martijn W. Heymans
JHJasmijn Holla
Jasmijn Holla
AHArja Häkkinen
Arja Häkkinen
JDJoost Dekker
Joost Dekker
Objective: To systematically summarize the literature on the course of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), prognostic factors that predict deterioration of pain, the course of physical functioning, and prognostic factors that predict deterioration of physical functioning in persons with knee OA.Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Psych‐INFO, and SPORTDiscus up to January 2014. A meta‐analysis and a qualitative data synthesis were performed.Results: Of the 58 studies included, 39 were of high quality. High heterogeneity across studies (I2 >90%) and within study populations (reflected by large SDs of change scores) was found. Therefore, the course of pain and physical functioning was interpreted to be indistinct. We found strong evidence for a number of prognostic factors predicting deterioration in pain (e.g., higher knee pain at baseline, bilateral knee symptoms, and depressive symptoms). We also found strong evidence for a number of prognostic factors predicting deterioration in physical functioning (e.g., worsening in radiographic OA, worsening of knee pain, lower knee extension muscle strength, lower walking speed, and higher comorbidity count).Conclusion: Because of high heterogeneity across studies and within study populations, no conclusions can be drawn with regard to the course of pain and physical functioning. These findings support current research efforts to define subgroups or phenotypes within knee OA populations. Strong evidence was found for knee characteristics, clinical factors, and psychosocial factors as prognostics of deterioration of pain and physical functioning.