Jinpeng Qiao

Jinpeng Qiao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 April 2025 in Separation and Purification Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDSheng Dong
Sheng Dong
JQJinpeng Qiao
Jinpeng Qiao
CKChao Kang
Chao Kang
MSMengyao Sun
Mengyao Sun
SYShengchao Yang
Shengchao Yang
CDChenlong Duan
Chenlong Duan

21 August 2023 in ACS Omega
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JQJinpeng Qiao
Jinpeng Qiao
JYJinshuo Yang
Jinshuo Yang
JLJunyu Lu
Junyu Lu
Recently, some novel screens were proposed based on the improved understanding of screening processes from particle-scale studies, one of which is the novel variable amplitude equal thickness vibration screen (VAETVS). This paper presents an investigation of using different aperture sizes to further optimize the VAETVS by the discrete element method (DEM). The screen was divided into three panels, and the aperture size of each panel was varied in the simulation. The particles' dynamics and spatial distribution were investigated to better understand the effects of varied amplitudes and aperture sizes on the screening efficiency. The results showed that the VAETVS can be effectively optimized by varied amplitude as well as varied aperture size for different screen panels. The amplitude variance is more effective for hard sieve particles and hindrance particles. It is also found that from the feed end to the discharge end, the difference in the distribution of particle mass between the coarse particles and the fine particles increases. Generally, such a difference can be increased with increasing aperture sizes. However, the effects of the apertures of the different panels were not the same. The simulated data were further analyzed by the Box-Behnken response surface method, which gave a mathematical model to predict the screening efficiency η with the varied apertures. From the model, the optimal aperture sizes are 7.5, 7.58, and 6.81 mm, yielding the maximum screening efficiency of 86.35%, and the optimal opening areas for the three panels are 35, 40, and 40%, respectively, yielding the maximum screening efficiency of 87.82%.

10 September 2025 in Minerals Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JYJinshuo Yang
Jinshuo Yang
MSMengyao Sun
Mengyao Sun
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
JQJinpeng Qiao
Jinpeng Qiao
YWYanze Wang
Yanze Wang
CDChenlong Duan
Chenlong Duan

23 April 2025 in Advanced Powder Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JQJinpeng Qiao
Jinpeng Qiao
YWYanze Wang
Yanze Wang
JYJinshuo Yang
Jinshuo Yang
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
CDChenlong Duan
Chenlong Duan

4 January 2025 in Advanced Powder Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
YWYanze Wang
Yanze Wang
SYShengchao Yang
Shengchao Yang
JQJinpeng Qiao
Jinpeng Qiao
JYJinshuo Yang
Jinshuo Yang
CDChenlong Duan
Chenlong Duan

5 November 2025 in Minerals Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYundong Yang
Yundong Yang
SNSabereh Nazari
Sabereh Nazari
JYJinshuo Yang
Jinshuo Yang
CKChao Kang
Chao Kang
CDChenlong Duan
Chenlong Duan
JQJinpeng Qiao
Jinpeng Qiao