Background: The pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is complex and multi-factorial. Increasing evidence has shown the important role of immune infiltration in AD. Thus the current study was designed to identify immune infiltration-related genes and to explore their diagnostic value in AD.Methods: The expression data of AD patients were downloaded from the GEO database. The limma R package identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between AD and controls. The CIBERSORT algorithm identified differentially infiltrated immune cells (DIICs) between AD and controls. DIIC-correlated DEGs were obtained by Pearson correlation analysis. WGCNA was employed to identify DIIC-related modules. Next, LASSO, RFE, and RF machine learning methods were applied to screen robust DIIC-related gene signatures in AD, followed by the construction and validation of a diagnostic nomogram. Detection of the expression of related genes in the peripheral blood of Alzheimer’s disease and healthy volunteers by RT-PCR. In addition, the CTD database predicted chemicals targeting DIIC-related gene signatures in the treatment of AD.Results: NK cells, M0 macrophages, activated myeloid dendritic cells, resting mast cells, CD8+ T cells, resting memory CD4+ T cells, gamma delta T cells, and M2 macrophages were differentially infiltrated between AD and controls. Pearson analysis identified a total of 277 DIIC-correlated DEGs between AD and controls. Thereafter, 177 DIIC-related genes were further obtained by WGCNA analysis. By LASSO, RFE and RF algorithms, CMTM2, DDIT4, LDHB, NDUFA1, NDUFB2, NDUFS5, RPL17, RPL21, RPL26 and NDUFAF2 were identified as robust gene signature in AD. The results of RT-PCR detection of peripheral blood samples from Alzheimer’s disease and healthy volunteers showed that the expression trend of ten genes screened was consistent with the detection results; among them, the expression levels of CMTM2, DDIT4, LDHB, NDUFS5, and RPL21 are significantly different among groups. Thus, a diagnostic nomogram based on a DIIC-related signature was constructed and validated. Moreover, candidate chemicals targeting those biomarkers in the treatment of AD, such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, rosiglitazone, and resveratrol, were identified in the CTD database.Conclusion: For the first time, we identified 10 immune infiltration-related biomarkers in AD, which may be helpful for the diagnosis of AD and provide guidance in the treatment of AD.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint disease characterized by the progressive degradation of articular cartilage, synovial inflammation, and subchondral bone remodeling. This review explores the interplay between aging, PANoptosis, and inflammation in OA progression. Age-related cellular and immune dysfunctions, including cellular senescence, senescence-associated secretory phenotypes (SASPs), and immunosenescence, significantly contribute to joint degeneration. In OA, dysregulated apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis, particularly in chondrocytes, exacerbate cartilage damage. Apoptosis, mediated by the JNK pathway, reduces chondrocyte density, while necroptosis and pyroptosis, involving RIPK-1/RIPK-3 and the NLRP3 inflammasome, respectively, amplify inflammation and cartilage destruction. Inflammatory cytokines and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) further enhance these PANoptotic pathways. Current therapeutic strategies primarily focus on anti-inflammatory agents such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids, with growing interest in anti-senescence drugs targeting cellular senescence and SASP. Additionally, exploring PANoptosis mechanisms offers potential for innovative OA treatments.

Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease with a long and slow course, which is one of the major causes of disability in middle and old-aged people. This study was dedicated to excavating the cellular senescence-associated biomarkers of OA. Methods: The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was searched and five datasets pertaining to OA were obtained. After removing the batch effect, the GSE55235, GSE55457, GSE82107, and GSE12021 datasets were integrated together for screening of the candidate genes by differential analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Next, those genes were further filtered by machine learning algorithms to obtain cellular senescence-associated biomarkers of OA. Subsequently, enrichment analyses based on those biomarkers were conducted, and we profiled the infiltration levels of 22 types immune cells with the ERSORT algorithm. A lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory and drug-gene network were constructed. Finally, we validated the senescence-associated biomarkers at both in vivo and in vitro levels. Results: Five genes (BCL6, MCL1, SLC16A7, PIM1, and EPHA3) were authenticated as cellular senescence-associated biomarkers in OA. ROC curves demonstrated the reliable capacity of the five genes as a whole to discriminate OA samples from normal samples. The nomogram diagnostic model based on 5 genes proved to be a reliable predictor of OA. Single-gene GSEA results pointed to the involvement of the five biomarkers in immune-related pathways and oxidative phosphorylation in the development of OA. Immune infiltration analysis manifested that the five genes were significantly correlated with differential immune cells. Subsequently, a lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network and gene-drug network containing were generated based on five cellular senescence-associated biomarkers in OA. Conclusion: A foundation for understanding the pathophysiology of OA and new insights into OA diagnosis and treatment were provided by the identification of five genes, namely BCL6, MCL1, SLC16A7, PIM1, and EPHA3, as biomarkers associated with cellular senescence in OA.

The slow-developing neurological disorder Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has no recognized etiology. A bioinformatics investigation verified copper metabolism indicators for AD development. GEO contributed AD-related datasets GSE1297 and GSE5281. Differential expression analysis and WGCNA confirmed biomarker candidate genes. Each immune cell type in AD and control samples was scored using single sample gene set enrichment analysis. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM) grouping, and expression analysis between control and AD samples discovered copper metabolism indicators that impacted AD progression. We test clinical samples and cellular function to ensure study correctness. Biomarker-targeting miRNAs and lncRNAs were predicted by starBase. Trust website anticipated biomarker-targeting transcription factors. In the end, Cytoscape constructed the TF/miRNA-mRNA and lncRNA-miRNA networks. The DGIdb database predicted biomarker-targeted drugs. We identified 57 differentially expressed copper metabolism-related genes (DE-CMRGs). Next, fourteen copper metabolism indicators impacting AD progression were identified: CCK, ATP6V1E1, SYT1, LDHA, PAM, HPRT1, SCG5, ATP6V1D, GOT1, NFKBIA, SPHK1, MITF, BRCA1, and CD38. A TF/miRNA-mRNA regulation network was then established with two miRNAs (hsa-miR-34a-5p and 34c-5p), six TFs (NFKB1, RELA, MYC, HIF1A, JUN, and SP1), and four biomarkers. The DGIdb database contained 171 drugs targeting ten copper metabolism-relevant biomarkers (BRCA1, MITF, NFKBIA, CD38, CCK2, HPRT1, SPHK1, LDHA, SCG5, and SYT1). Copper metabolism biomarkers CCK, ATP6V1E1, SYT1, LDHA, PAM, HPRT1, SCG5, ATP6V1D, GOT1, NFKBIA, SPHK1, MITF, BRCA1, and CD38 alter AD progression, laying the groundwork for disease pathophysiology and novel AD diagnostic and treatment.