Eric E Grossman

Dr. Eric E Grossman

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2008
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
CICharles H. Fletcher III
Charles H. Fletcher III
CBChris Bochicchio
Chris Bochicchio
CCChris L. Conger
Chris L. Conger
MEMary S. Engels
Mary S. Engels
EFEden J. Feirstein
Eden J. Feirstein
SVSean Vitousek
Sean Vitousek

13 April 2025 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MOMichael J. Osland
Michael J. Osland
JBJohn B. Bradford
John B. Bradford
LTLauren Toth
Lauren Toth
MGMatthew J. Germino
Matthew J. Germino
JGJames B. Grace
James B. Grace
KBKevin Buffington
Kevin Buffington
An ecological threshold is the point at which a comparatively small environmental change triggers an abrupt and disproportionately large ecological response. In the face of accelerating climate change, there is concern that abrupt ecosystem transformations will become more widespread as critical ecological thresholds are crossed. There has been ongoing debate, however, regarding the prevalence of ecological thresholds across the natural world. While ecological thresholds are ubiquitous in some ecosystems, thresholds have been difficult to detect in others. Some studies have even concluded that threshold responses are uncommon in the natural world and overly emphasized in the ecological literature. As ecologists who work in ecosystems chronically exposed to high abiotic stress, we consider ecological thresholds and ecosystem transformations to be critical concepts that can greatly advance understanding of ecological responses to climate change and inform ecosystem management. But quantifying ecological thresholds can be challenging, if not impossible, without data that are strategically collected for that purpose. Here, we present a conceptual framework built upon linkages between abiotic stress, climate‐driven ecological threshold responses, and the risk of ecosystem transformation. We also present a simple approach for quantifying ecological thresholds across abiotic stress gradients. We hypothesize that climate‐driven threshold responses are especially influential in ecosystems chronically exposed to high abiotic stress, where autotroph diversity is low and foundation species play a prominent ecological role. Abiotic conditions in these environments are often near physiological tolerance limits of foundation species, which means that small abiotic changes can trigger landscape‐level ecological transformations. Conversely, the alleviation of stress near thresholds can allow foundation species to thrive and spread into previously inhospitable locations. We provide examples of this climate‐driven threshold behavior from four high‐stress environments: coastal wetlands, coral reefs, drylands, and alpine ecosystems. Our overarching aim in this review is to clarify the strong relationships between abiotic stress, climate‐driven ecological thresholds, and the risk of ecosystem transformation under climate change.

20 January 2024 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNC.M. (Kees) Nederhoff
C.M. (Kees) Nederhoff
SCSean C. Crosby
Sean C. Crosby
NANate R. Van Arendonk
Nate R. Van Arendonk
EGEric E Grossman
Eric E Grossman
BTBabak Tehranirad
Babak Tehranirad
PBPatrick Barnard
Patrick Barnard
The Puget Sound Coastal Storm Modeling System (PS-CoSMoS) is a tool designed to dynamically downscale future climate scenarios (i.e., projected changes in wind and pressure fields and temperature) to compute regional water levels, waves, and compound flooding over large geographic areas (100 s of kilometers) at high spatial resolutions (1 m) pertinent to coastal hazard assessments and planning. This research focuses on advancing robust and computationally efficient approaches to resolving the coastal compound flooding components for complex, estuary environments and their application to the Puget Sound region of Washington State (USA) and the greater Salish Sea. The modeling system provides coastal planners with projections of storm hazards and flood exposure for recurring flood events, spanning the annual to 1-percent annual chance of flooding, necessary to manage public safety and the prioritization and cost-efficient protection of critical infrastructure and valued ecosystems. The tool is applied and validated for Whatcom County, Washington, and includes a cross-shore profile model (XBeach) and overland flooding model (SFINCS) and is nested in a regional tide–surge model and wave model. Despite uncertainties in boundary conditions, hindcast simulations performed with the coupled model system accurately identified areas that were flooded during a recent storm in 2018. Flood hazards and risks are expected to increase exponentially as the sea level rises in the study area of 210 km of shoreline. With 1 m of sea-level rise, annual flood extents are projected to increase from 13 to 33 km2 (5 and 13% of low-lying Whatcom County) and flood risk (defined in USD) is projected to increase fifteenfold (from 14 to USD 206 million). PS-CoSMoS, like its prior iteration in California (CoSMoS), provides valuable coastal hazard projections to help communities plan for the impacts of sea-level rise and storms.

1 February 2006 in Marine Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EGEric E Grossman
Eric E Grossman
WBW.A. Barnhardt
W.A. Barnhardt
PHP. Hart
P. Hart
BRB.M. Richmond
B.M. Richmond
MFM.E. Field
M.E. Field

1 January 2023
Verified
Report
Closed access
MCMichael Chang
Michael Chang
Li EriksonLi Erikson
Li Erikson
KAKathleen Araujo
Kathleen Araujo
EAErica N. Asinas
Erica N. Asinas
SHSamantha Chisholm Hatfield
Samantha Chisholm Hatfield
Vivek ShandasVivek Shandas
Vivek Shandas

1 September 2020 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DNDaniel J. Nowacki
Daniel J. Nowacki
EGEric E Grossman
Eric E Grossman