There is limited available data addressing whether inactivated COVID-19 vaccination before conception is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. This cohort study included all singleton live births at our center from March 1 to June 30, 2022. According to whether a maternal inactivated COVID-19 vaccination had been administered within 3 months before conception or not, neonates were identified as being in the vaccinated or unvaccinated group. Vaccination information and clinical characteristics were extracted for analysis. Furthermore, neonatal outcomes were analyzed and compared between these two groups in the present study. The cohort included 856 eligible newborns, of whom 369 were exposed to maternal vaccination before conception and 487 were unexposed newborns. No differences were observed in rates of preterm birth, newborns being small for gestational age, or neonatal intensive care unit admission between exposed and unexposed newborns. Furthermore, even after adjusting for social–economic status and maternal characteristics, there remained no significant differences in these neonatal outcomes. Our study revealed no statistically significant differences between newborns born to women who received inactivated vaccines prior to conception compared with those who did not receive any vaccinations. In addition, our study also highlights the importance of considering COVID-19 vaccination before conception.

Introduction: Urine proteomics plays an important role in the screening of biomarkers for infant diseases. However, there is no unified standard for the selection of urine samples for urine proteomics. It is also unclear whether there are differences in proteomics between whole urine and urine supernatant. Therefore, the urine of preterm infants was used as the research sample to explore the differences in protein profiles between the whole urine and urine supernatant of preterm infants by proteomics. Methods: Urine samples were collected from five preterm infants with a gestational age of <28 weeks at their corrected gestational age of 37 weeks. Each preterm urine was divided into whole urine and supernatant. Urine protein was extracted and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: The two groups of urine samples did not show significant clustering in the principal component analysis. A total of 2,607 proteins were detected in the two groups of urine samples, of which 82 proteins were unique to whole urine samples and 56 proteins were unique to urine supernatant samples. The molecular functions, the main biological processes, and subcellular localization of the differential proteins were analyzed. In other neonatal-related diseases, there was no significant difference in protein enrichment between whole urine and urine supernatant. Conclusions: This study analyzed the differences between whole urine and urine supernatant in urine proteomics of preterm infants. In neonatal-related diseases, there is no significant difference in urinary protein biomarkers between whole urine and urine supernatant.