C. Michael Smith

C. Michael Smith


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2006 in Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSC. Michael Smith
C. Michael Smith
EBElena V. Boyko
Elena V. Boyko
Plant genes participating in the recognition of aphid herbivory in concert with plant genes involved in defense against herbivores mediate plant resistance to aphids. Several such genes involved in plant disease and nematode resistance have been characterized in detail, but their existence has only recently begun to be determined for arthropod resistance. Hundreds of different genes are typically involved and the disruption of plant cell wall tissues during aphid feeding has been shown to induce defense responses in Arabidopsis, Triticum, Sorghum, and Nicotiana species. Mi‐1.2, a tomato gene for resistance to the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas), is a member of the nucleotide‐binding site and leucine‐rich region Class II family of disease, nematode, and arthropod resistance genes. Recent studies into the differential expression of Pto‐ and Pti1‐like kinase genes in wheat plants resistant to the Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko), provide evidence of the involvement of the Pto class of resistance genes in arthropod resistance. An analysis of available data suggests that aphid feeding may trigger multiple signaling pathways in plants. Early signaling includes gene‐for‐gene recognition and defense signaling in aphid‐resistant plants, and recognition of aphid‐inflicted cell damage in both resistant and susceptible plants. Furthermore, signaling is mediated by several compounds, including jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, ethylene, abscisic acid, giberellic acid, nitric oxide, and auxin. These signals lead to the development of direct chemical defenses against aphids and general stress‐related responses that are well characterized for a number of abiotic and biotic stresses. In spite of major plant taxonomic differences, similarities exist in the types of plant genes expressed in response to feeding by different species of aphids. However, numerous differences in plant signaling and defense responses unique to specific aphid–plant interactions have been identified and warrant further investigation.

7 January 2012 in Annual Review of Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSC. Michael Smith
C. Michael Smith
SCStephen L. Clement
Stephen L. Clement
Arthropod-resistant crops provide significant ecological and economic benefits to global agriculture. Incompatible interactions involving resistant plants and avirulent pest arthropods are mediated by constitutively produced and arthropod-induced plant proteins and defense allelochemicals synthesized by resistance gene products. Cloning and molecular mapping have identified the Mi-1.2 and Vat arthropod resistance genes as CC-NBS-LRR (coiled coil–nucleotide binding site–leucine rich repeat) subfamily NBS-LRR resistance proteins, as well as several resistance gene analogs. Genetic linkage mapping has identified more than 100 plant resistance gene loci and linked molecular markers used in cultivar development. Rice and sorghum arthropod-resistant cultivars and, to a lesser extent, raspberry and wheat cultivars are components of integrated pest management (IPM) programs in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Nevertheless, arthropod resistance in most food and fiber crops has not been integrated due primarily to the application of synthetic insecticides. Plant and arthropod genomics provide many opportunities to more efficiently develop arthropod-resistant plants, but integration of resistant cultivars into IPM programs will succeed only through interdisciplinary collaboration.


1 March 2001 in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XLX. M. Liu
X. M. Liu
CSC. Michael Smith
C. Michael Smith
BGB. S. Gill
B. S. Gill
VTVicki Louise Tolmay
Vicki Louise Tolmay

21 February 2010 in Journal of Chemical Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSC. Michael Smith
C. Michael Smith
XLXuming Liu
Xuming Liu
LWLiang J. Wang
Liang J. Wang
XLXiang Liu
Xiang Liu
MCMing-Shun Chen
Ming-Shun Chen
JBJianfa Bai
Jianfa Bai

16 July 2005 in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LZL. C. Zhu
L. C. Zhu
CSC. Michael Smith
C. Michael Smith
AFA. Fritz
A. Fritz
EBE. Boyko
E. Boyko
PVP. Voothuluru
P. Voothuluru
BGB. S. Gill
B. S. Gill