Gundula Schulze-Tanzil

Dr. Gundula Schulze-Tanzil


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2010 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TJThilo John
Thilo John
DLDörte Lodka
Dörte Lodka
BKBenjamin Kohl
Benjamin Kohl
WEWolfgang Ertel
Wolfgang Ertel
JJJennifer Jammrath
Jennifer Jammrath
GSGundula Schulze-Tanzil
Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
Tendon injury induces a local inflammatory response, characterized by the induction of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of TNFα, IL‐6 and IL‐10 on key parameters of tendon homeostasis. Cultured primary human tenocytes were treated with the recombinant cytokines IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFα, or combinations of TNFα with IL‐6 and IL‐10 (10 ng/mL, 6, 24 h). Expression of type I collagen, elastin, MMP‐1, TNFα, IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐10, and suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS1, 3) was analyzed with the use of RTD‐PCR, immunocytochemistry, and Western blot analysis. In response to TNFα, tenocytes reduced their type I collagen deposition but increased their elastin gene expression and highly upregulated their expression for MMP‐1, pro‐inflammatory (TNFα, IL‐1β) and immunoregulatory (IL‐6, IL‐10) cytokines. TNFα stimulation augmented SOCS1, whereas SOCS3 expression in tenocytes was also induced by IL‐6. The treatment of tenocytes with IL‐6 and IL‐10 had no effect on cytokine expression. Neither IL‐6 nor IL‐10 modulated the observed effects of TNFα significantly. These results indicate that TNFα strongly activates the tenocytes to amplify their own TNFα expression and, subsequently, that of other regulatory cytokines and matrix degrading enzymes. However, the impact of IL‐6 and IL‐10 on tenocytes remains unclear. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 28:1071–1077, 2010

7 January 2011 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGundula Schulze-Tanzil
Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
OAO. Al‐Sadi
O. Al‐Sadi
EWE. Wiegand
E. Wiegand
WEW. Ertel
W. Ertel
CBC. Busch
C. Busch
TPT. Pufe
T. Pufe

5 November 2012 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGundula Schulze-Tanzil
Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
OAOnays Al-Sadi
Onays Al-Sadi
WEWolfgang Ertel
Wolfgang Ertel
ALAnke Lohan
Anke Lohan
Tendon healing is generally a time-consuming process and often leads to a functionally altered reparative tissue. Using degradable scaffolds for tendon reconstruction still remains a compromise in view of the required high mechanical strength of tendons. Regenerative approaches based on natural decellularized allo- or xenogenic tendon extracellular matrix (ECM) have recently started to attract interest. This ECM combines the advantages of its intrinsic mechanical competence with that of providing tenogenic stimuli for immigrating cells mediated, for example, by the growth factors and other mediators entrapped within the natural ECM. A major restriction for their therapeutic application is the mainly cell-associated immunogenicity of xenogenic or allogenic tissues and, in the case of allogenic tissues, also the risk of disease transmission. A survey of approaches for tendon reconstruction using cell-free tendon ECM is presented here, whereby the problems associated with the decellularization procedures, the success of various recellularization strategies, and the applicable cell types will be thoroughly discussed. Encouraging in vivo results using cell-free ECM, as, for instance, in rabbit models, have already been reported. However, in comparison to native tendon, cells remain mostly inhomogeneously distributed in the reseeded ECM and do not align. Hence, future work should focus on the optimization of tendon ECM decellularization and recolonization strategies to restore tendon functionality.

1 August 2009 in Current Gene Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGundula Schulze-Tanzil
Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
HZHala Zreiqat
Hala Zreiqat
RSRobert Sabat
Robert Sabat
BKBenjamin Kohl
Benjamin Kohl
AHAndreas Halder
Andreas Halder
TJThilo John
Thilo John
Interleukin (IL)-10 is a well known anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokine, mainly released by, and acting on cells of the immune system such as monocytes, macrophages, T cells, NK cells, and B cells. IL-10 is also produced by a few connective tissue cell types including chondrocytes and is involved in processes such as connective tissue extracellular matrix remodelling, although its exact function in articular cartilage remains unclear. This review article summarizes after a short insight into functions of IL-10 in the immune system most of the published literature on the role of IL-10 in articular cartilage homeostasis and disorders. A critical analysis of the present literature was undertaken leading to a survey of the significance of IL-10 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA) and blood induced cartilage damage with particular focus on the direct impact of IL-10 on chondrocyte biology. IL-10 is up-regulated in RA and OA and therapeutic effects of IL-10 in experimental arthritis using several gene therapeutic approaches were reported, mainly through an immune cell mediated immunosuppression mechanism. Recently, a direct anti-inflammatory, -catabolic and -apoptotic potential of IL-10 in cartilage was described, suggesting a chondroprotective effect of IL-10, not only in RA and OA, but also in non-RA and non-systemic cartilage disorders. Chondroprotection by IL-10 may be a promising tool in arthritis therapy, as IL-10 plays a role in joint and cartilage immunoregulation and homeostasis. However, a crucial problem remains to be the optimisation of local and continuous therapeutic effective levels of IL-10 administration in the joint.

15 October 2010 in Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKarym El Sayed
Karym El Sayed
AHAndreas Haisch
Andreas Haisch
TJThilo John
Thilo John
UMUlrike Marzahn
Ulrike Marzahn
ALAnke Lohan
Anke Lohan
GSGundula Schulze-Tanzil
Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
Injured articular cartilage is limited in its capacity to heal. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) is a suitable technique for cartilage repair, but it requires articular cartilage biopsies for sufficient autologous chondrocyte expansion in vitro. Hence, ACT is restricted by donor-site morbidity and autologous articular chondrocytes availability. The use of nonarticular heterotopic chondrocytes such as auricular, nasoseptal, or costal chondrocytes for ACT might overcome these limitations: heterotopic sources show lesser donor-site morbidity and a comparable extracellular cartilage matrix synthesis profile to articular cartilage. However, heterotopic (h)ACT poses a challenge. Particular tissue characteristics of heterotopic cartilage, divergent culturing peculiarities of heterotopic chondrocytes, and the advantages and drawbacks related to these diverse cartilage sources were critically discussed. Finally, available in vitro and in vivo experimental (h)ACT approaches were summarized. The quality of the cartilage engineered using heterotopic chondrocytes remains partly controversy due to the divergent methodologies and culture conditions used. While some encouraging in vivo results using (h)ACT have been demonstrated, standardized culturing protocols are strongly required. However, whether heterotopic chondrocytes implanted into joint cartilage defects maintain their particular tissue properties or can be adapted via tissue engineering strategies to fulfill regular articular cartilage functions requires further studies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMichal Jagielski
Michal Jagielski
JWJohannes Wolf
Johannes Wolf
UMUlrike Marzahn
Ulrike Marzahn
AVAnna Voelker
Anna Voelker
MLMarion Lemke
Marion Lemke
GSGundula Schulze-Tanzil
Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
Chondrogenic differentiated mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a promising cell source for articular cartilage repair. This study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of two three-dimensional (3D) culture systems for chondrogenic MSC differentiation in comparison to primary chondrocytes and to assess the effect of Interleukin (IL)-10 and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)α on chondrogenesis by MSCs in 3D high-density (H-D) culture. MSCs were isolated from femur spongiosa, characterized using a set of typical markers and introduced in scaffold-free H-D cultures or non-woven polyglycolic acid (PGA) scaffolds for chondrogenic differentiation. H-D cultures were stimulated with recombinant IL-10, TNFα, TNFα + IL-10 or remained untreated. Gene and protein expression of type II collagen, aggrecan, sox9 and TNFα were examined. MSCs expressed typical cell surface markers and revealed multipotency. Chondrogenic differentiated cells expressed cartilage-specific markers in both culture systems but to a lower extent when compared with articular chondrocytes. Chondrogenesis was more pronounced in PGA compared with H-D culture. IL-10 and/or TNFα did not impair the chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs. Moreover, in most of the investigated samples, despite not reaching significance level, IL-10 had a stimulatory effect on the type II collagen, aggrecan and TNFα expression when compared with the respective controls.