Obesity in women is a significant public health issue with serious implications for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. This complex challenge is influenced by physiological, hormonal, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. Women face unique weight management challenges due to hormonal changes during pregnancy, perimenopause, and menopause, which affect fat distribution and increase cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome risk. Current clinical guidelines often overlook these sex-specific factors, potentially limiting the effectiveness of obesity management strategies in women. This review explores the sex-specific aspects of obesity’s pathophysiology, epidemiological trends, and associated comorbidities, focusing on cardiovascular and metabolic complications. This review synthesizes literature on obesity in women, emphasizing sex-specific factors influencing its development and progression. It examines the limitations of body mass index as an obesity measure and explores alternative classification methods. Additionally it investigates the relationship between obesity and comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, with a focus on postmenopausal women. Obesity in women is linked to increased risks of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Hormonal fluctuations throughout life contribute to weight gain and fat distribution patterns specific to women, increasing cardiovascular disease risk. Effective obesity management strategies in women must account for these sex-specific variations. Postmenopausal women are particularly affected by obesity-related complications. Lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery have shown efficacy in weight management, though success rates vary. Addressing obesity in women requires a comprehensive approach that considers sex-specific physiological factors, life-stage challenges, and sociocultural barriers. Integrating precision medicine and emerging therapies offers potential for more personalized and effective interventions. Personalized strategies that consider women’s biological and life-stage challenges can enhance obesity management and improve cardiovascular outcomes. Future research and clinical practice should focus on developing tailored strategies that address women’s unique vulnerabilities to obesity and its associated health risks and on validating sex-specific interventions to improve obesity management in women.

Introduction: Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) and Metabolic-Dysfunction Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH) are linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, increasing liver-related morbidity and cardiovascular risk. Recent therapies, including Resmetirom, FGF21 analogs, and GLP-1 agonists, have shown promise. This network meta-analysis evaluates their comparative efficacy and safety. Methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Included clinical trials addressed MASLD or MASH with Resmetirom, FGF21 analogs, or GLP-1 agonists. Statistical analyses used a random-effects model, calculating mean differences (MD) and relative risks (RR), with heterogeneity assessed using τ², I², and Q statistics. Results: MASH resolution was significantly higher for FGF21 (RR 4.84, 95% CI: 2.59 to 9.03), Resmetirom showed the most significant reduction in MRI-PDFF (MD −18.41, 95% CI: −23.60 to −13.22) and >30% fat reduction (RR 3.56, 95% CI: 2.41 to 5.26). Resmetirom significantly reduced ALT (MD −15.71, 95% CI: −23.30 to −8.13), AST (MD −12.28, 95% CI: −21.07 to −3.49), and GGT (MD −19.56, 95% CI: −34.68 to −4.44). FGF21 and GLP-1 also reduced these markers. Adverse events were significantly higher with Resmetirom (RR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.74), while GLP-1 and FGF21 showed non-significant trends towards increased risk. Conclusions: Resmetirom and FGF21 show promise in treating MASLD and MASH, with Resmetirom particularly effective in reducing liver fat and improving liver enzymes. GLP-1 agonists also show benefits but to a lesser extent. Further long-term studies are needed to validate these findings and assess cost-effectiveness.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of recent innovations in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which include once‐weekly formulations such as tirzepatide, a dual glucagon‐like peptide‐1 and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, and once‐weekly insulin options such as icodec and basal insulin Fc. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted. The network meta‐analysis protocol was registered at OSF registries ( https://osf.io/gd67x ). The primary outcome of interest was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), with change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, incidence of hypoglycaemia, and treatment discontinuation as secondary outcomes. Results: Tirzepatide exhibited superior efficacy in reducing HbA1c levels compared with insulin therapies, with the 15‐mg dose showing the most significant reduction (mean difference [MD] −1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.49; −1.0). In terms of FPG reduction, tirzepatide 15 mg ranked highest (MD −0.70, 95% CI −1.05; −0.34), followed by tirzepatide 10 mg and 5 mg. Additionally, tirzepatide led to substantial weight loss, with the 15‐mg dose exhibiting the most pronounced effect (MD −12.13, 95% CI −13.98; −10.27). However, a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation were associated with tirzepatide, particularly at higher doses. Conclusion: Tirzepatide, particularly at higher doses, demonstrates superior efficacy in lowering HbA1c and reducing hypoglycaemia risk compared with weekly insulin. However, its use is also associated with a higher incidence of AEs and treatment discontinuation.

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly impacts global health due to its complications and the economic burden it places on healthcare systems. The rise of novel once-weekly diabetes medications with different mechanisms of action necessitates an evaluation of their relative efficacy and safety. Objectives: This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly insulin analogs (icodec and BIF) with once-weekly GLP-1/GIP agonists (semaglutide, exenatide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide) in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared these treatments with a baseline of daily basal insulin. Primary outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and tolerability. Results: The analysis integrated data from 25 RCTs, involving 18,257 patients. Tirzepatide significantly outperformed other treatments in reducing HbA1c and promoting weight loss. Weekly insulins, compared to GLP-1/GIP agonists, showed a more tolerable profile and were beneficial for certain patient demographics emphasizing weight stability. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that while once-weekly GLP-1/GIP agonists provide superior glycemic control and weight management, weekly insulins offer viable options for patients prioritizing fewer side effects and weight stability. This comprehensive comparison aids in refining personalized treatment strategies for T2DM management.

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of allulose on blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Primary outcomes include postprandial blood glucose, while secondary outcomes are time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and insulin area under the curve (AUC). A systematic search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library until May 20, 2024. Randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of allulose on glycemic parameters in T2DM patients were included. Data were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis model, and the quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Six studies involving 126 participants were included. Allulose significantly reduced glucose AUC (SMD: -0.6662, 95 % CI [-1.1360, -0.1964], p = 0.0054) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 58.3 %). Insulin AUC showed a non-significant reduction (SMD: -0.3648, 95 % CI [-0.7783, 0.0488], p = 0.0839). FPG demonstrated a non-significant reduction (MD: -5.8925, 95 % CI [-20.4892, 8.7043], p = 0.4288), while TAR significantly decreased (MD: -8.8204, 95 % CI [-14.4101, -3.2307], p = 0.0020). No significant changes were observed in TIR (MD: 7.1211, 95 % CI [-1.6028, 15.8450], p = 0.1096). Allulose demonstrated a significant reduction in postprandial glucose levels and TAR, supporting its role as a dietary intervention for glycemic control in T2DM patients. The findings are robust, though further research is needed to confirm its long-term effects on insulin sensitivity and metabolic health.