A deep learning model showed improved overall sensitivity compared with manual identification of pulmonary nodules and was insensitive to radiation dose, patient age, or CT manufacturer; the model ... Purpose To compare sensitivity in the detection of lung nodules between the deep learning (DL) model and radiologists using various patient population and scanning parameters and to assess whether ...

Background: Due to different treatment method and prognosis of different subtypes of lung adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) on computed tomography (CT) scan, it is important to classify invasive adenocarcinomas from non-invasive adenocarcinomas. The purpose of this paper is to build and evaluate the performance of deep learning networks on the differentiation the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma appearing as GGNs. Methods: This retrospective study included 886 GGNs from 794 pathological confirmed patients with lung adenocarcinoma for training and testing the proposed networks. Three deep learning networks, namely XimaNet (deep learning-based classification model), XimaSharp (classification and nodule segmentation model), and Deep-RadNet (deep learning and radiomics combined classification model, i.e., deep radiomics) were built. Three classification tasks, namely task 1: classification of AAH/AIS and MIA, task 2: classification of MIA and IAC, and task 3: classification of non-invasive adenocarcinomas and invasive adenocarcinomas (AAH/AIS&MIA and IAC) were conducted to evaluate the model performance. The Z-test was used to compare the model performance. Results: The AUC for classification of AAH/AIS with MIA were 0.891, 0.841 and 0.779 for Deep-RadNet, XimaNet and XimaSharp respectively. The AUC for classification of MIA with IAC were 0.889, 0.785 and 0.778 for three networks and AUC for classification of AAH/AIS&MIA with IAC were 0.941, 0.892 and 0.827 respectively. The performance of deep_RadNet was better than the other two models with the Z-test (P<0.05). Conclusions: Deep-RadNet with the visual heat map could evaluate the invasiveness of GGNs accurately and intuitively, providing a theoretical basis for individualized and accurate medical treatment of patients with GGNs.

Background: Computed tomography (CT) plays a great role in characterizing and quantifying changes in lung structure and function of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to explore the performance of CT-based whole lung radiomic in discriminating COPD patients and non-COPD patients. Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 2785 patients who underwent pulmonary function examination in 5 hospitals and were divided into non-COPD group and COPD group. The radiomic features of the whole lung volume were extracted. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was applied for feature selection and radiomic signature construction. A radiomic nomogram was established by combining the radiomic score and clinical factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the radiomic nomogram in the training, internal validation, and independent external validation cohorts. Results: Eighteen radiomic features were collected from the whole lung volume to construct a radiomic model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomic model in the training, internal, and independent external validation cohorts were 0.888 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.869–0.906], 0.874 (95%CI 0.844–0.904) and 0.846 (95%CI 0.822–0.870), respectively. All were higher than the clinical model (AUC were 0.732, 0.714, and 0.777, respectively, P < 0.001). DCA demonstrated that the nomogram constructed by combining radiomic score, age, sex, height, and smoking status was superior to the clinical factor model. Conclusions: The intuitive nomogram constructed by CT-based whole-lung radiomic has shown good performance and high accuracy in identifying COPD in this multicenter study.

The study aims to investigate the value of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics and clinical-radiological features for predicting spread through air spaces (STAS) in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 336 NSCLC patients from our hospital were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 236) and the internal validation cohort (n = 100) at a ratio of 7:3, and 69 patients from the other two external hospitals were collected as the external validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to select clinical-radiological features and construct a clinical model. The GTV, PTV5, PTV10, PTV15, PTV20, GPTV5, GPTV10, GPTV15, and GPTV20 models were constructed based on intratumoral and peritumoral (5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm) radiomics features. Additionally, the radscore of the optimal radiomics model and clinical-radiological predictors were used to construct a combined model and plot a nomogram. Lastly, the ROC curve and AUC value were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the model. Tumor density type (OR = 6.738) and distal ribbon sign (OR = 5.141) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of STAS. The GPTV10 model outperformed the other radiomics models, and its AUC values were 0.887, 0.876, and 0.868 in the three cohorts. The AUC values of the combined model constructed based on GPTV10 radscore and clinical-radiological predictors were 0.901, 0.875, and 0.878. DeLong test results revealed that the combined model was superior to the clinical model in the three cohorts. The nomogram based on GPTV10 radscore and clinical-radiological features exhibited high predictive efficiency for STAS status in NSCLC.