Jacob Hjelmborg

Prof. Jacob Hjelmborg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 January 2016 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLorelei A. Mucci
Lorelei A. Mucci
JHJacob Hjelmborg
Jacob Hjelmborg
JHJennifer R. Harris
Jennifer R. Harris
KCKamila Czene
Kamila Czene
DHDavid J. Havelick
David J. Havelick
JKJaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio
The global burden of cancer is considerable, with an estimated 12 million new cases and 8 million cancer deaths each year.1 In 2015 in the United States, 1.7 million individuals will be diagnosed with cancer and 590 000 will die of cancer, accounting for 1 in 4 deaths.2 In the Nordic countries, cancer is the leading cause of mortality, accounting for 30% of all deaths. Refinement of primary and secondary prevention strategies (ie, factors that would have the greatest influence on reducing cancer incidence and mortality) requires a detailed understanding of the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to disease pathogenesis.

4 February 2006 in Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJacob Hjelmborg
Jacob Hjelmborg
IIIvan Iachine
Ivan Iachine
ASAxel Skytthe
Axel Skytthe
JVJames W. Vaupel
James W. Vaupel
MMMatt McGue
Matt McGue
KCKaare Christensen
Kaare Christensen

1 September 2003 in The American Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHelle Bruunsgaard
Helle Bruunsgaard
KAKaren Andersen-Ranberg
Karen Andersen-Ranberg
JHJacob Hjelmborg
Jacob Hjelmborg
BPBente Klarlund Pedersen
Bente Klarlund Pedersen
BJBernard Jeune
Bernard Jeune

1 July 2006 in Annals of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHenrik Frederiksen
Henrik Frederiksen
JHJacob Hjelmborg
Jacob Hjelmborg
JMJakob Mortensen
Jakob Mortensen
MMMatt Mcgue
Matt Mcgue
JVJames W. Vaupel
James W. Vaupel
KCKaare Christensen
Kaare Christensen

1 November 2014 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJacob Hjelmborg
Jacob Hjelmborg
TSThomas Scheike
Thomas Scheike
KHKlaus Holst
Klaus Holst
ASAxel Skytthe
Axel Skytthe
KPKathryn L. Penney
Kathryn L. Penney
LMLorelei A. Mucci
Lorelei A. Mucci
Background: Prostate cancer is thought to be the most heritable cancer, although little is known about how this genetic contribution varies across age. Methods: To address this question, we undertook the world's largest prospective study in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer cohort, including 18,680 monozygotic (MZ) and 30,054 dizygotic (DZ) same-sex male twin pairs. We incorporated time-to-event analyses to estimate the risk concordance and heritability while accounting for censoring and competing risks of death, essential sources of biases that have not been accounted for in previous twin studies modeling cancer risk and liability. Results: The cumulative risk of prostate cancer was similar to that of the background population. The cumulative risk for twins whose co-twin was diagnosed with prostate cancer was greater for MZ than for DZ twins across all ages. Among concordantly affected pairs, the time between diagnoses was significantly shorter for MZ than DZ pairs (median, 3.8 versus 6.5 years, respectively). Genetic differences contributed substantially to variation in both the risk and the liability [heritability = 58% (95% confidence interval, 52%–63%)] of developing prostate cancer. The relative contribution of genetic factors was constant across age through late life with substantial genetic heterogeneity even when diagnosis and screening procedures vary. Conclusions: Results from the population-based twin cohort indicate a greater genetic contribution to the risk of developing prostate cancer when addressing sources of bias. The role of genetic factors is consistently high across age. Impact: Findings affect the search for genetic and epigenetic markers and frame prevention efforts. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(11); 2303–10. ©2014 AACR.

12 February 2008 in American Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMasayuki Kimura
Masayuki Kimura
JHJacob Hjelmborg
Jacob Hjelmborg
JGJeffrey P. Gardner
Jeffrey P. Gardner
LBLise Bathum
Lise Bathum
MBMichael Brimacombe
Michael Brimacombe
KCKaare Christensen
Kaare Christensen
Leukocyte telomere length, representing the mean length of all telomeres in leukocytes, is ostensibly a bioindicator of human aging. The authors hypothesized that shorter telomeres might forecast imminent mortality in elderly people better than leukocyte telomere length. They performed mortality analysis in 548 same-sex Danish twins (274 pairs) aged 73–94 years, of whom 204 pairs experienced the death of one or both co-twins during 9–10 years of follow-up (1997–2007). From the terminal restriction fragment length (TRFL) distribution, the authors obtained the mean TRFL (mTRFL) and the mean values of the shorter 50% (mTRFL50) and shortest 25% (mTRFL25) of TRFLs in the distribution and computed the mode of TRFL (MTRFL). They analyzed the proportions of twin pairs in which the co-twin with the shorter telomeres died first. The proportions derived from the intrapair comparisons indicated that the shorter telomeres predicted the death of the first co-twin better than the mTRFL did (mTRFL: 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49, 0.63; mTRFL50: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.66; mTRFL25: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.66; MTRFL: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.67). The telomere-mortality association was stronger in years 3–4 than in the rest of the follow-up period, and it grew stronger with increasing intrapair difference in all telomere parameters. Leukocyte telomere dynamics might help explain the boundaries of the human life span.