Mohammed Salman Alhassan

Dr. Mohammed Salman Alhassan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in MOJ Orthopedics & Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMohammed Salman Alhassan
Mohammed Salman Alhassan
YAYaseen Alrasasy
Yaseen Alrasasy
OAOmar Alrasheed
Omar Alrasheed
AAAbdullah Albahrani
Abdullah Albahrani
TATurki Alshammari
Turki Alshammari
AAAbbas Aljumaiah
Abbas Aljumaiah
Background: Although data demonstrate the ability of the menisci to transmit load, they do not contribute to the primary stability of the knee. In absence of ACL, the menisci have shown to enhance the knee's stability in AP, varus-valgus, internal-external direction in vitro. The importance of addressing meniscal pathology associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency stems from the increased incidence of meniscal tear with chronic instability. Most of the studies showed Lateral meniscus injury with acute ACL tear.

27 August 2019 in MOJ Orthopedics & Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAhmad N Boeisa
Ahmad N Boeisa
MAMohammed Salman Alhassan
Mohammed Salman Alhassan
Checkrein deformity may occur after leg or ankle fractures. It is a dynamic flexion deformity of the big toe after planter flextion of the ankle that disappear when the ankle is dorsiflexed. It is believed to be the result of Tethering or entrapment of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon in scar tissue or callus at the fracture site,1,2 It was also suggested that it results from contracture of the FHL muscles due to a subclinical or missed compartment syndrome.3 Checkrein deformity is usually noticed during follow up in clinic and it may not respond to conservative management like stretching exercises. Surgical treatment is best done at midfoot by FHL tendon lengthening over lengthening at the fracture site.

14 July 2024 in Foot and Ankle Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMohammed Salman Alhassan
Mohammed Salman Alhassan
BPByoung Kyu Park
Byoung Kyu Park
Mudit ShahMudit Shah
Mudit Shah
KPKun-Bo Park
Kun-Bo Park
HPHOON PARK
HOON PARK
HKHyun Woo Kim
Hyun Woo Kim

30 July 2019 in MOJ Orthopedics & Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAhmad N Boeisa
Ahmad N Boeisa
MAMohammed Salman Alhassan
Mohammed Salman Alhassan
AAAli Almuslami
Ali Almuslami
Isolated paediatric femoral fracture is common and can be missed due to many Factors such as patient related, clinical, technical and radiological error. Careful listening to patient complain and examination along with careful look up and emphasising in radiological evaluation used for diagnosis. Prophylactic hip spica is an option in such condition for short period and callus might show up.

21 October 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGöker Utku Değer
Göker Utku Değer
HPHeon Jung Park
Heon Jung Park
KPKyeong-Hyeon Park
Kyeong-Hyeon Park
HPHOON PARK
HOON PARK
MAMohammed Salman Alhassan
Mohammed Salman Alhassan
KPKun-Bo Park
Kun-Bo Park
Background/Objectives: The distorted vertebral body has been studied in scoliosis; however, there is little knowledge about the difference between neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis. This study aimed to investigate the vertebral body morphology in patients with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and scoliosis (CP scoliosis) and compare them with those of apex- and Cobb angle-matched patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: Thirty-four patients with CP scoliosis and thirty-two patients with AIS were included. The pedicle diameter, chord length, and vertebral body rotation were evaluated at one level above the apex, one level below the apex, and at the apex using a reconstructed computed tomography scan. The apex of the curve and Cobb angle were too diverse between patients with CP scoliosis or AIS. Eighteen patients were matched in each group according to the apex and Cobb angle (within 5-degree differences) of the major curve, and compared between matched groups (mCPscoliosis vs. mAIS). Results: In the comparison of the apex and Cobb angle-matched groups, there was no statistical difference in the Cobb angle between mCPscoliosis (80.7 ± 13.8 degrees) and mAIS (78.6 ± 13.6 degrees, p = 0.426), and the vertebral body rotation (25.4 ± 15.4° in mCPscoliosis vs. 24.4 ± 6.5° in mAIS, p = 0.594). There was no difference in the pedicle diameters of either the convex (3.6 ± 1.1 mm in mCPscoliosis vs. 3.3 ± 1.2 mm in mAIS, p = 0.24) or concave side (3.1 ± 1.2 mm in mCPscoliosis vs. 2.7 ± 1.6 mm in mAIS, p = 0.127). However, the patients in the mCPscoliosis group were younger (12.7 ± 2.5 years vs. 14.6 ± 2.4 years, p = 0.001), and the chord length was shorter on the convex (38.0 ± 5.0 mm vs. 40.4 ± 4.9 mm, p = 0.025) and concave (37.7 ± 5.2 mm vs. 40.3 ± 4.7 mm, p = 0.014) sides compared with those of the mAIS group. Conclusions: With a similar apex and Cobb angle, the vertebral body rotation and pedicle diameter in patients with CP scoliosis were comparable to those with AIS; however, the chord length was shorter in CP scoliosis. For the selection of the pedicle screw in CP scoliosis, the length of the pedicle screw should be more considered than the diameter.