Cem Polat Çetinkaya

Dr. Cem Polat Çetinkaya

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 October 2012 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHNilgün B. Harmancıoğlu
Nilgün B. Harmancıoğlu
FBFiliz Barbaros
Filiz Barbaros
CÇCem Polat Çetinkaya
Cem Polat Çetinkaya

23 March 2018 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CÇCem Polat Çetinkaya
Cem Polat Çetinkaya
MGMert Can Gunacti
Mert Can Gunacti

1 January 2008 in Journal of Hydroinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CÇCem Polat Çetinkaya
Cem Polat Çetinkaya
OFOkan Fistikoglu
Okan Fistikoglu
NHNilgün B. Harmancıoğlu
Nilgün B. Harmancıoğlu
KFKurt Fedra
Kurt Fedra
This paper aims to present the information-based technologies used for water management in a test basin within the scope of the EU-sponsored SMART and OPTIMA projects. The study uses a dynamic simulation model with its associated databases and a water resources planning and optimization system, established through a web-based client–server implementation to support distributed use and easy access for multi-criteria optimization and decision support. The results clearly illustrate how a consistent and well-integrated set of advanced but practical Decision Support System (DSS) tools can be used for efficient “optimal” water management strategies and policies of use, designed for a participatory public decision-making process.

5 September 2022 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMert Can Gunacti
Mert Can Gunacti
GGGülay Onuşluel Gül
Gülay Onuşluel Gül
CÇCem Polat Çetinkaya
Cem Polat Çetinkaya
AGAli Gül
Ali Gül
FBFiliz Barbaros
Filiz Barbaros

1 February 2012 in Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CÇCem Polat Çetinkaya
Cem Polat Çetinkaya
NHNilgün B. Harmancıoğlu
Nilgün B. Harmancıoğlu
PHPh.D.
Ph.D.
M.M.Asce
M.Asce
Water quality monitoring network design is an iterative procedure, where an existing network should be reassessed from time to time on the basis of changing environmental demands and objectives in water quality management. In recent years, the economic and financial constraints faced by monitoring agencies have led to the initiation of network reduction procedures in the space domain (i.e., the reduction of the number of stations within a network). In this regard, the dynamic programming approach (DPA) can be effectively used to determine which monitoring sites are to be preserved when the network is consolidated for a fixed number of stations. However, previous studies on the use of the DPA methodology in network redesign have not yet resolved two basic questions: (1) what is the required (optimum) number of stations to be retained in the network to best represent the basin? and (2) how many subbasins should be selected when segregating the basin into smaller units as foreseen by DPA? Accordingly, the primary objective of this paper is to modify the DPA approach to determine the optimum number of stations to be retained when consolidating a monitoring network. In previous studies, the selection of subbasins in DPA was realized basically by subjective approaches based on general experiences of the designers so that the secondary objective of the study is to expand the capabilities of DPA by utilizing a more systematic approach to subbasin identification. The previously mentioned modifications to the DPA methodology are demonstrated in the case of a water quality monitoring network in Gediz River basin along the Aegean coast of Turkey. The results obtained indicate that DPA can also be an effective tool in optimizing the number of stations to be retained in a monitoring network.

1 May 2014 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CÇCem Polat Çetinkaya
Cem Polat Çetinkaya
NHNilgun B. Harmancioglu
Nilgun B. Harmancioglu