Maxillofacial fractures are a prevalent occurrence, and the widespread use of miniplates to stabilize and secure these fractures during surgery is common. However, the post-surgical fate of these miniplates remains a subject of contention among surgeons. Some advocate for their removal, while others suggest leaving them in place. This study aims to perform an extensive meta-analysis of pertinent studies to ascertain the destiny of miniplates employed in maxillofacial surgery and discuss the consequences of either their extraction or retention. To execute this meta-analysis, a search was conducted across number of databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Embase, and Scopus. Keywords such as “titanium miniplates”, “screws”, “maxillofacial surgery”, “complications”, and “removal” were utilized to identify pertinent studies. The search was constrained to studies published between 1989 and 2022. The analysis encompassed only studies reporting outcomes related to miniplates in maxillofacial surgery, including complication rates and removal frequencies. Eleven studies conformed to the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 2240 patients, ten of which were retrospectives and one prospective, with the largest study involving 434 patients. The overall complication rate was determined to be 13.3%. The most prevalent reasons for miniplate removal included patient preference, tooth extraction, and infections. The average time span for miniplate removal was 10.7 months, with the most prolonged reported duration being 24 years. These findings imply that immediate removal might not be imperative in the majority of instances. In conclusion, our meta-analysis underscores the necessity of removing miniplates in cases where hardware leads to a variety of complications and physical discomfort. Principal factors driving plate removal included patient requests, tooth extractions, and infections. Ordinarily, plate removal took place within the span of 6 to 12 months, with the mandible being the most frequent site for removal. These findings accentuate the significance of extended monitoring to assess the trajectory of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery and provide valuable insights for future clinical decisions. To validate these conclusions and gain deeper insights into the factors influencing plate removal in maxillofacial surgery, further research with larger participant cohorts and standardized outcome reporting is imperative.

Background/Objectives: The use of miniplates for stabilizing bones post orthognathic surgery has surged in popularity due to their efficacy in ensuring stability and hastening recovery. However, controversy exists regarding what should be done with these miniplates after surgery. Some surgeons advocate for their removal, while others suggest leaving them in place. This study sought to assess the frequency, causes, and potential risk factors linked with miniplate removal in orthognathic procedures. Methods: A thorough meta-analysis was conducted by scrutinizing studies from various databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus, focusing on publications spanning from 1989 to 2023. Results: Ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1603 patients, were chosen for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The male-to-female ratio varied from 0.7:1 to 4:1. Overall, 5595 miniplates were inserted, with 294 (5.3%) being subsequently removed. Primary reasons for miniplate removal included infection (161 cases, 2.9%), exposure of miniplates (34 cases, 0.6%), and palpable plates (23 cases, 0.4%). Other indications comprised pain, patient preference, and temperature sensitivity. Less frequent causes for miniplate removal included sinusitis, secondary surgery, and dental pathology. The mean duration of miniplate removal was 5.5 months, with the majority (56.1%) being removed from the mandible rather than the maxilla. In conclusion, this meta-analysis underscores the importance of miniplate removal when hardware causes complications and physical discomfort. The primary reasons for removing miniplates were infection and plate exposure, with the mandible being the most common removal site. Conclusions: These findings emphasize the need for continued monitoring to assess the fate of miniplates in orthognathic surgery and provide valuable information for future clinical decision-making.

Background/Objectives: Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology that can affect multiple organs, including the oral cavity. This study aimed to compare the clinical and demographic characteristics of sarcoidosis cases with and without bone involvement in the jaw. Methods: A systematic review of the case reports and case series of sarcoidosis in the oral cavity between 1943 to 2024 were analyzed. Variables assessed included age, sex, presenting symptoms, duration of symptoms, diagnosis methodology, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Results: A total of 59 studies reporting 77 patients were included, with a mean age of 43.3 yrs. Female predominance was noted in both, bone-involved (61.5%) and non-bone-involvement cases (72.5%). Patients with bone involvement often presented with localized symptoms such as loose teeth (34.6%), bone loss (69.2%), and nasal obstruction (15.4%), whereas non-bone-involvement cases frequently exhibited soft tissue manifestations, like swelling (38%) and bleeding (14%). Treatment typically involved surgical intervention and steroid therapy in both groups, with favorable outcomes achieved in most cases. Conclusions: This systematic review presents the most extensive analysis of oral sarcoidosis. Oral sarcoidosis presents as two distinct clinical entities based on bone involvement. Soft tissue lesions often serve as an early diagnostic clue for systemic disease, while bony manifestations suggest a later, more destructive complication. Recognizing this dichotomy is crucial for dentists and clinicians to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate referral, and this underscores the oral cavity’s critical role as an indicator of systemic illness and mandates a multidisciplinary management strategy.

Background: Salivary gland sarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of systemic sarcoidosis that poses a challenge in terms of its diagnosis due to its similarities to disorders such as Sjögren’s syndrome, other granulomatous diseases, and infections. Objective: To systematically review reported cases of salivary gland sarcoidosis and summarize clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Medline for case reports and case series published up to April 2025. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024629263) and was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Variables assessed included age, sex, presenting symptoms, location, duration of symptoms, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Study quality assessment was assessed using The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools. Results: A total of 28 articles involving 39 participants met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 42.7 years. Salivary gland sarcoidosis predominantly affected female patients (66.7%). The parotid gland was the most frequently involved site (82.1%). Common presenting features included glandular swelling that is usually painless, xerostomia, and facial palsy. Sarcoidosis was newly diagnosed in 82.1% of cases, primarily through histopathological examination revealing non-caseating granulomas. Systemic corticosteroids were the most common treatment. Outcomes were favorable in nearly all cases, with complete resolution post treatment or spontaneous remission without treatment. Conclusions: Salivary gland sarcoidosis predominantly affects middle-aged women, typically presenting as a painless parotid swelling and often serving as the initial sign of systemic disease. Diagnosis requires histopathological confirmation via biopsy, as serum ACE levels are insufficient alone. The prognosis is excellent, with most patients responding favorably to corticosteroids or even experiencing spontaneous resolution. This condition must be considered in differential diagnoses for persistent salivary gland swellings to ensure accurate diagnosis and prevent unnecessary interventions.

Maxillofacial fractures are a prevalent occurrence, and the widespread use of miniplates to stabilize and secure these fractures during surgery is common. However, the post-surgical fate of these miniplates remains a subject of contention among surgeons. Some advocate for their removal, while others suggest leaving them in place. This study aims to perform an extensive meta-analysis of pertinent studies to ascertain the destiny of miniplates employed in maxillofacial surgery and discuss the consequences of either their extraction or retention. To execute this meta-analysis, an exhaustive search was conducted across multiple databases, encompassing PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Keywords such as "titanium miniplates," "screws," "maxillofacial surgery," "complications," and "removal" were utilized to identify pertinent studies. The search was constrained to studies published between 1989 and 2022. The analysis encompassed only studies reporting outcomes related to miniplates in maxillofacial surgery, including complication rates and removal frequencies. Eleven studies conformed to the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 2240 patients. All the studies had a retrospective design, with the largest study involving 800 patients. The overall complication rate was determined to be 13.3%. The most prevalent reasons for miniplate removal included patient preference, tooth extraction, and infections. The average time span for miniplate removal was 10.7 months, with the most prolonged reported duration being 24 years. These findings imply that immediate removal might not be imperative in the majority of instances. In conclusion, our meta-analysis underscores the necessity of removing miniplates in cases where hardware leads to a variety of complications and physical discomfort. Principal factors driving plate removal included patient requests, tooth extractions, and infections. Ordinarily, plate removal took place within the span of 6 to 12 months, with the mandible being the most frequent site for removal. These findings accentuate the significance of extended monitoring to assess the trajectory of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery and provide valuable insights for future clinical decisions. To validate these conclusions and gain deeper insights into the factors influencing plate removal in maxillofacial surgery, further research with larger participant cohorts and standardized outcome reporting is imperative.

Background/Objectives: Canalicular adenoma (CaA) is a rare benign salivary gland neoplasm that primarily arises in minor salivary glands. Due to histological overlaps with other benign and malignant tumors, accurate diagnosis remains a challenge. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the clinical presentation, histopathological features, immunohistochemical (IHC) profiles, treatment modalities, and outcomes of CaA affecting the minor salivary glands. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was conducted for case reports and case series published in English between 2017 and 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023462417). Eligible studies described canalicular adenoma (CaA) of the minor salivary glands with clinical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and treatment information. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools, and data were synthesized descriptively due to heterogeneity in reporting. Results: Out of 1573 records identified, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 44 cases. Canalicular adenoma most frequently affected the upper lip (63.6%), followed by the buccal mucosa and palate. Patients ranged from 29 to 84 years (mean 66 years), with a female predominance. Clinically, lesions presented as slow-growing, painless nodules measuring 2–40 mm. Histopathology consistently demonstrated branching canal-like structures lined by columnar or cuboidal epithelial cells, with immunohistochemistry showing positivity for AE1/AE3, CK7, S-100, and SOX10 and negativity for p63 and α-SMA. Surgical excision was the primary treatment, and recurrence was not reported in any of the 14 cases with documented post-treatment follow-up. Most studies showed moderate to high methodological quality. Conclusions: Canalicular adenoma is a rare benign neoplasm with a strong predilection for older women and for the upper lip. Accurate diagnosis requires correlation of clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features due to its resemblance to other salivary gland tumors. Surgical management yields excellent outcomes, though multifocality may complicate interpretation of recurrence. Larger multi-institutional studies are needed to refine diagnostic criteria and clarify biological behavior.