LY-CoV555, a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein–specific antibody, neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 and protects the airways of nonhuman primates against infection.

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) comprises insulin lispro covalently bound to a 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) at lysine B28. The biologic fate of BIL and unconjugated PEG were examined in rats given a single 0.5-mg/kg i.v. or 2-mg/kg s.c. dose of BIL with (14)C label in 20-kDa PEG or (125)I label in lispro. Unconjugated (14)C-labeled 20-kDa PEG was dosed at 10 mg/kg i.v. or s.c. Blood, urine, and feces were collected up to 336 hours after dosing. Radioactivity was measured by scintillation spectrometry, and BIL was quantitated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Area under the curve and half-life for immunoreactive BIL were lower than those for both (14)C and (125)I after subcutaneous and intravenous administration. The half-lives of (14)C after BIL and PEG dosing were similar. The clearance of immunoreactive BIL was 2.4-fold faster than that of (14)C and 1.6-fold faster than (125)I. After a subcutaneous dose of BIL, immunoreactive BIL accounted for 31% of the circulating (125)I and 16% of the circulating (14)C, indicating extensive catabolism of BIL. Subcutaneous bioavailability of BIL was 23%-29%; bioavailability for unconjugated PEG was 78%. For unconjugated PEG, most of the (14)C dose was recovered in urine. For BIL, ≥86% of (125)I was eliminated in urine and (14)C was eliminated about equally in urine and feces. The major (14)C-labeled catabolism product of BIL in urine was 20-kDa PEG with lysine attached. The attachment of 20-kDa PEG to lispro in BIL led to a different elimination pathway for PEG compared with unconjugated 20-kDa PEG.

Background: The prediction of human clearance (CL) and subcutaneous (SC) bioavailability is a critical aspect of monoclonal antibody (mAb) selection for clinical development. While monkeys are a well-accepted model for predicting human CL, other preclinical species have been less-thoroughly explored. Unlike CL, predicting the bioavailability of SC administered mAbs in humans remains challenging as contributing factors are not well understood, and preclinical models have not been systematically evaluated. Methods: Non-clinical and clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were mined from public and internal sources for rats, cynomolgus monkeys, and humans. Intravenous (IV) and SC PK was determined in Sprague Dawley rats for fourteen mAbs without existing PK data. Together, we obtained cross-species data for 25 mAbs to evaluate CL and SC bioavailability relationships among rats, monkeys, and humans. Results: Rat and monkey CL significantly correlated with human CL and supported the use of species-specific exponents for body-weight-based allometric scaling. Notably, rat SC bioavailability significantly correlated with human SC bioavailability, while monkey SC bioavailability did not. Bioavailability also correlated with clearance. Conclusions: The rat model enables an early assessment of mAb PK properties, allowing discrimination among molecules in the discovery pipeline and prediction of human PK. Importantly, rat SC bioavailability significantly correlated with human SC bioavailability, which has not been observed with other species. Rats are cost-effective and efficient relative to monkeys and provide a valuable tool for pharmacokinetic predictions in therapeutic antibody discovery.

Background/Objectives: Anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation can impact the safety, pharmacokinetics, and/or efficacy of biotherapeutics, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Current strategies for ADA/immunogenicity risk prediction of mAbs include in silico algorithms, T cell proliferation assays, MHC-associated peptide proteomics assays (MAPPs), and dendritic cell internalization assays. However, B cell-mediated responses are not assessed in these assays. B cells are professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and secrete antibodies toward immunogenic mAbs. Therefore, methods to determine B cell responses would be beneficial for immunogenicity risk prediction and may provide a more comprehensive assessment of risk. Methods: We used a PBMC culture method with the addition of IL-4, IL-21, B cell activating factor (BAFF), and an anti-CD40 agonist mAb to support B cell survival and activation. Results: B cells in this assay format become activated, proliferate, and secrete IgG. A panel of 51 antibodies with varying clinical immunogenicity rates were screened in this assay with IgG secretion used as a readout for immunogenicity risk. IgG secretion differed among test articles but did not correlate with the clinical immunogenicity rating. Conclusions: This dataset highlights the challenges of developing a B cell assay for immunogenicity risk prediction and provides a framework for further refinement of a B cell-based assay for immunogenicity risk prediction of mAbs.

As part of the non-clinical safety package characterizing bamlanivimab (SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibody), the risk profile for antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADE) was evaluated in vitro and in an African green monkey (AGM) model of COVID-19. In vitro ADE assays in primary human macrophage, Raji, or THP-1 cells were used to evaluate enhancement of viral infection. Bamlanivimab binding to C1q, FcR, and cell-based effector activity was also assessed. In AGMs, the impact of bamlanivimab pretreatment on viral loads and clinical and histological pathology was assessed to evaluate enhanced SARS-CoV-2 replication or pathology. Bamlanivimab did not increase viral replication in vitro, despite a demonstrated effector function. In vivo, no significant differences were found among the AGM groups for weight, temperature, or food intake. Treatment with bamlanivimab reduced viral loads in nasal and oral swabs and BAL fluid relative to control groups. Viral antigen was not detected in lung tissue from animals treated with the highest dose of bamlanivimab. Bamlanivimab did not induce ADE of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro or in an AGM model of infection at any dose evaluated. The findings suggest that high-affinity monoclonal antibodies pose a low risk of mediating ADE in patients and support their safety profile as a treatment of COVID-19 disease.