Ana Maria Caetano Faria

Ana Maria Caetano Faria


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 July 2005 in Immunological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAna Maria Caetano Faria
Ana Maria Caetano Faria
HWHoward L. Weiner
Howard L. Weiner

15 April 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDaria Esterházy
Daria Esterházy
MCMaria C. C. Canesso
Maria C. C. Canesso
LMLuka Mesin
Luka Mesin
PMPaul A. Muller
Paul A. Muller
TCTiago B. R. de Castro
Tiago B. R. de Castro
DMDaniel Mucida
Daniel Mucida

1 May 2012 in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVErica Leandro Marciano Vieira
Erica Leandro Marciano Vieira
ALAlda J. Leonel
Alda J. Leonel
ASAlexandre P. Sad
Alexandre P. Sad
NBNathália R.M. Beltrão
Nathália R.M. Beltrão
TCThaís F. Costa
Thaís F. Costa
Jacqueline Isaura Alvarez-LeiteJacqueline Isaura Alvarez-Leite
Jacqueline Isaura Alvarez-Leite

1 January 1999
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
AFAna Maria Caetano Faria
Ana Maria Caetano Faria
HWHoward L. Weiner
Howard L. Weiner

1 January 2006 in Journal of Immunology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAna Maria Caetano Faria
Ana Maria Caetano Faria
HWHoward L. Weiner
Howard L. Weiner
Oral tolerance is classically defined as the suppression of immune responses to antigens (Ag) that have been administered previously by the oral route. Multiple mechanisms of tolerance are induced by oral Ag. Low doses favor active suppression, whereas higher doses favor clonal anergy/deletion. Oral Ag induces Th2 (IL‐4/IL‐10) and Th3 (TGF‐β) regulatory T cells (Tregs) plus CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells and LAP+T cells. Induction of oral tolerance is enhanced by IL‐4, IL‐10, anti‐IL‐12, TGF‐β, cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), Flt‐3 ligand, anti‐CD40 ligand and continuous feeding of Ag. In addition to oral tolerance, nasal tolerance has also been shown to be effective in suppressing inflammatory conditions with the advantage of a lower dose requirement. Oral and nasal tolerance suppress several animal models of autoimmune diseases including experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), uveitis, thyroiditis, myasthenia, arthritis and diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse, plus non‐autoimmune diseases such as asthma, atherosclerosis, colitis and stroke. Oral tolerance has been tested in human autoimmune diseases including MS, arthritis, uveitis and diabetes and in allergy, contact sensitivity to DNCB, nickel allergy. Positive results have been observed in phase II trials and new trials for arthritis, MS and diabetes are underway. Mucosal tolerance is an attractive approach for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases because of lack of toxicity, ease of administration over time and Ag‐specific mechanism of action. The successful application of oral tolerance for the treatment of human diseases will depend on dose, developing immune markers to assess immunologic effects, route (nasal versus oral), formulation, mucosal adjuvants, combination therapy and early therapy.

24 September 2002 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRuth Maron
Ruth Maron
GSGalina Sukhova
Galina Sukhova
AFAna Maria Caetano Faria
Ana Maria Caetano Faria
EHEthan Hoffmann
Ethan Hoffmann
FMFrancois Mach
Francois Mach
HWHoward L. Weiner
Howard L. Weiner
Background— Increasing evidence supports the involvement of inflammation and immunity in atherogenesis as well as the role of autoimmunity to heat shock proteins (HSPs) in the progression of atherosclerosis. Mucosal administration of autoantigens decreases organ-specific inflammation and disease in several models of autoimmunity (diabetes, arthritis, and encephalomyelitis) and is also being tested in human clinical trials. Methods and Results— We examined the effect of nasal or oral administration of mycobacterial HSP-65 on atherosclerotic lesion formation in mice lacking the receptor for LDL that were maintained on a high-cholesterol diet. Animals were nasally or orally treated for 1 week with HSP-65, and a high-cholesterol diet was started after the last treatment. The mice were mucosally treated once a week for 8 or 12 weeks, at which time pathological analysis was performed. We found a significant decrease in the size of atherosclerotic plaques, a reduction in macrophage-positive area in the aortic arch, increased interleukin-10 expression, and a reduced number of T cells in nasally treated animals compared with control animals. A similar trend was observed in orally treated mice, but it was not significant. Conclusions— Our results demonstrate that nasal vaccination with HSP reduces the inflammatory process associated with atherosclerosis and provides a new immunologic approach for the treatment of atherosclerosis.